Factors Affecting Consumers Compliance Intention: Consumption Tax Evasion as an Ethical Dilemma

Swathy Krishna, Shacheendran V
{"title":"Factors Affecting Consumers Compliance Intention: Consumption Tax Evasion as an Ethical Dilemma","authors":"Swathy Krishna, Shacheendran V","doi":"10.1177/09728686241231430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumption tax evasion (CTE) is an ethical dilemma that can enlarge the presence of the shadow economy. The empirical literature mainly focused on the ethical dimension of the business community, thus there is insufficient literature related to the ethical decision-making process on the consumer’s side. So, the present study attempts to explore the ethical decision-making process of consumers regarding CTE. The study used three major components of Jones’s Issue Contingent Model to study the consumer’s ethical decision-making regarding CTE. The study proposes a conceptual model by linking idealism, relativism, religiosity and attitude with the three components of the issue contingent model. The result of the study was based on primary data collected from consumers in the Kerala State. The data obtained was examined using the PLS-SEM technique which confirms the influence of idealism, relativism and attitude on the moral recognition of consumers regarding CTE. The result also concludes that moral recognition leads to moral judgement, which in turn, plays a vital role in inculcating moral compliance intention in the minds of consumers.","PeriodicalId":509197,"journal":{"name":"Review of Professional Management","volume":"33 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Professional Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09728686241231430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumption tax evasion (CTE) is an ethical dilemma that can enlarge the presence of the shadow economy. The empirical literature mainly focused on the ethical dimension of the business community, thus there is insufficient literature related to the ethical decision-making process on the consumer’s side. So, the present study attempts to explore the ethical decision-making process of consumers regarding CTE. The study used three major components of Jones’s Issue Contingent Model to study the consumer’s ethical decision-making regarding CTE. The study proposes a conceptual model by linking idealism, relativism, religiosity and attitude with the three components of the issue contingent model. The result of the study was based on primary data collected from consumers in the Kerala State. The data obtained was examined using the PLS-SEM technique which confirms the influence of idealism, relativism and attitude on the moral recognition of consumers regarding CTE. The result also concludes that moral recognition leads to moral judgement, which in turn, plays a vital role in inculcating moral compliance intention in the minds of consumers.
影响消费者守法意愿的因素:作为道德困境的消费逃税行为
消费逃税(CTE)是一种道德困境,会扩大影子经济的存在。实证文献主要集中在企业界的伦理层面,因此与消费者伦理决策过程相关的文献不足。因此,本研究试图探讨消费者对 CTE 的伦理决策过程。本研究采用了琼斯问题权变模型的三个主要组成部分来研究消费者对 CTE 的伦理决策。本研究将理想主义、相对主义、宗教信仰和态度与问题权变模型的三个组成部分联系起来,提出了一个概念模型。研究结果基于从喀拉拉邦消费者那里收集到的原始数据。使用 PLS-SEM 技术对所获得的数据进行了检验,结果证实了理想主义、相对主义和态度对消费者对 CTE 的道德认同的影响。研究结果还得出结论,道德认知会导致道德判断,而道德判断反过来又会在向消费者灌输遵守道德的意愿方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信