COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF TOPICAL NIFEDIPINE AND DILTIAZEM IN THE TREATMENT OF ANAL FISSURES

.. Sadia, S. Naseer, A. Farooqi, I. Zulfikar, S. Saeed, HH Shah
{"title":"COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF TOPICAL NIFEDIPINE AND DILTIAZEM IN THE TREATMENT OF ANAL FISSURES","authors":".. Sadia, S. Naseer, A. Farooqi, I. Zulfikar, S. Saeed, HH Shah","doi":"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anal fissure, a tear in the anal canal below the dentate line, is commonly managed pharmacologically as the primary approach, with surgery considered secondary. Objective: To compare the efficacy of topical nifedipine and diltiazem in the prompt resolution of pain and bleeding associated with anal fissure management. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi, from June 2023 to November 2023. One hundred patients with anal fissures were randomly allocated into two groups: Group N (Nifedipine) and Group D (Diltiazem). Topical medication was administered until healing occurred. The visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed the patient's progress in terms of bleeding and pain. Side effects were monitored. Statistical analysis included an independent t-test for comparing VAS scores and a post-stratification chi-square test for associations between bleeding, side effects, and other variables. Results: At baseline, mean pain scores were 8.30±0.90 in group D and 7.78±1.29 in group N. At the first follow-up, mean pain scores were 5.58±1.34 in group D and 4.56±1.48 in group N, with a significant difference (p<0.001). Bleeding did not significantly decrease at the first follow-up but decreased significantly at the subsequent follow-ups in both groups. Side effects did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: Topical nifedipine is more effective than diltiazem for managing anal fissures in terms of pain reduction. However, both medications showed comparable efficacy in reducing bleeding, with no significant difference in side effects observed.","PeriodicalId":504575,"journal":{"name":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anal fissure, a tear in the anal canal below the dentate line, is commonly managed pharmacologically as the primary approach, with surgery considered secondary. Objective: To compare the efficacy of topical nifedipine and diltiazem in the prompt resolution of pain and bleeding associated with anal fissure management. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi, from June 2023 to November 2023. One hundred patients with anal fissures were randomly allocated into two groups: Group N (Nifedipine) and Group D (Diltiazem). Topical medication was administered until healing occurred. The visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed the patient's progress in terms of bleeding and pain. Side effects were monitored. Statistical analysis included an independent t-test for comparing VAS scores and a post-stratification chi-square test for associations between bleeding, side effects, and other variables. Results: At baseline, mean pain scores were 8.30±0.90 in group D and 7.78±1.29 in group N. At the first follow-up, mean pain scores were 5.58±1.34 in group D and 4.56±1.48 in group N, with a significant difference (p<0.001). Bleeding did not significantly decrease at the first follow-up but decreased significantly at the subsequent follow-ups in both groups. Side effects did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: Topical nifedipine is more effective than diltiazem for managing anal fissures in terms of pain reduction. However, both medications showed comparable efficacy in reducing bleeding, with no significant difference in side effects observed.
外用硝苯地平和地尔硫卓治疗肛裂的疗效比较
肛裂是齿状线以下肛管的撕裂,通常以药物治疗为主,手术为辅。目的:比较外用硝苯地平和地尔硫平治疗肛裂的疗效:比较硝苯地平外用药和地尔硫卓外用药在迅速缓解与肛裂治疗相关的疼痛和出血方面的疗效。研究方法2023 年 6 月至 2023 年 11 月,卡拉奇露丝-K.M.-普福平民医院开展了一项前瞻性队列研究。100 名肛裂患者被随机分配到两组:N组(硝苯地平)和D组(地尔硫卓)。两组患者均接受局部药物治疗,直至痊愈。用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者的出血和疼痛情况。对副作用进行监测。统计分析包括比较 VAS 评分的独立 t 检验,以及出血、副作用和其他变量之间关联的分层后 chi-square 检验。结果首次随访时,D 组的平均疼痛评分为 5.58±1.34,N 组为 4.56±1.48,差异显著(P<0.001)。两组患者的出血量在首次随访时均未明显减少,但在随后的随访中均明显减少。副作用在各组间无明显差异。结论就减轻疼痛而言,外用硝苯地平比地尔硫卓治疗肛裂更有效。不过,两种药物在减少出血方面的疗效相当,副作用也无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信