Economic Competitiveness of Battery Electric Vehicles vs Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles in India: A Case Study for Two- and Four-Wheelers

Deepak Kumar, Amir F. N. Abdul-Manan, Gautam Kalghatgi, A. Agarwal
{"title":"Economic Competitiveness of Battery Electric Vehicles vs Internal\n Combustion Engine Vehicles in India: A Case Study for Two- and\n Four-Wheelers","authors":"Deepak Kumar, Amir F. N. Abdul-Manan, Gautam Kalghatgi, A. Agarwal","doi":"10.4271/13-05-02-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The initial cost of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is higher than internal\n combustion engine-powered vehicles (ICEVs) due to expensive batteries. Various\n factors affect the total cost of ownership of a vehicle. In India, consumers are\n concerned with a vehicle’s initial purchase cost and prefer owning an economical\n vehicle. The higher cost and shorter range of BEVs compared to ICEVs severely\n limit their penetration in the Indian market. However, government subsidies and\n incentives support BEVs. The total cost of ownership assessment is used to\n evaluate the entire cost of a vehicle to find the most economical option among\n different powertrains. This study compares 2W (two-wheeler) and 4W\n (four-wheeler) BEV’s cost vis-à-vis equivalent ICEVs in Delhi and Mumbai. The\n cost analysis assesses the current and future government policies to promote\n BEVs. Two assumed policies were applied to estimate future scenarios. Annual\n distance traveled, battery replacement assumptions, and fuel/electricity prices\n were used for sensitivity analyses. It was found that the total cost of\n ownership of 2W BEVs in Mumbai and Delhi was lower than the ICEVs, only if\n heavily supported by government subsidies and incentives. In contrast, with\n assumed future policies, owning 4W BEVs was costlier, even with government\n subsidies. This study showed that if a vehicle travels more than the average\n annual distance traveled, BEVs can be a better option and make sense for niche\n applications such as taxi fleet operations or ride-hailing services. The current\n incentives were much more for 4W than 2W, implying a disproportionate allocation\n of subsidies to the wealthier, who can afford 4W vehicles. The funds required\n for subsidies, losses in fuel taxes because of lower sales, and tax exemptions\n offered to BEVs could cost up to ₹146,062 crores (i.e., $19 billion) annually to\n the Indian government in 2030, which is ~ ₹973 per capita, excluding investments\n required to build charging infrastructure. Therefore, India needs a targeted\n subsidy allocation plan, prioritizing 2W, and a phased strategy for an orderly\n and inclusive transition to a sustainable mobility future.\n\n \n\n Graphical Abstract\n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":181105,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Energy, Environment, & Policy","volume":"15 S9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Energy, Environment, & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/13-05-02-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The initial cost of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is higher than internal combustion engine-powered vehicles (ICEVs) due to expensive batteries. Various factors affect the total cost of ownership of a vehicle. In India, consumers are concerned with a vehicle’s initial purchase cost and prefer owning an economical vehicle. The higher cost and shorter range of BEVs compared to ICEVs severely limit their penetration in the Indian market. However, government subsidies and incentives support BEVs. The total cost of ownership assessment is used to evaluate the entire cost of a vehicle to find the most economical option among different powertrains. This study compares 2W (two-wheeler) and 4W (four-wheeler) BEV’s cost vis-à-vis equivalent ICEVs in Delhi and Mumbai. The cost analysis assesses the current and future government policies to promote BEVs. Two assumed policies were applied to estimate future scenarios. Annual distance traveled, battery replacement assumptions, and fuel/electricity prices were used for sensitivity analyses. It was found that the total cost of ownership of 2W BEVs in Mumbai and Delhi was lower than the ICEVs, only if heavily supported by government subsidies and incentives. In contrast, with assumed future policies, owning 4W BEVs was costlier, even with government subsidies. This study showed that if a vehicle travels more than the average annual distance traveled, BEVs can be a better option and make sense for niche applications such as taxi fleet operations or ride-hailing services. The current incentives were much more for 4W than 2W, implying a disproportionate allocation of subsidies to the wealthier, who can afford 4W vehicles. The funds required for subsidies, losses in fuel taxes because of lower sales, and tax exemptions offered to BEVs could cost up to ₹146,062 crores (i.e., $19 billion) annually to the Indian government in 2030, which is ~ ₹973 per capita, excluding investments required to build charging infrastructure. Therefore, India needs a targeted subsidy allocation plan, prioritizing 2W, and a phased strategy for an orderly and inclusive transition to a sustainable mobility future. Graphical Abstract
印度电池电动汽车与内燃机汽车的经济竞争力:两轮和四轮汽车案例研究
由于电池价格昂贵,电池电动汽车(BEV)的初始成本高于内燃机动力汽车(ICEV)。影响汽车总拥有成本的因素有很多。在印度,消费者关注的是汽车的初始购买成本,更倾向于购买经济型汽车。与内燃机车相比,BEV 成本较高,续航里程较短,这严重限制了其在印度市场的渗透。不过,政府的补贴和激励措施对 BEV 提供了支持。总拥有成本评估用于评估车辆的全部成本,以便在不同的动力系统中找到最经济的选择。本研究比较了德里和孟买的 2W(两轮车)和 4W(四轮车)BEV 与同等 ICEV 的成本。成本分析评估了当前和未来政府推广 BEV 的政策。在估算未来情景时,采用了两种假定政策。年行驶距离、电池更换假设和燃料/电力价格被用于敏感性分析。结果发现,在孟买和德里,只有在政府补贴和激励措施的大力支持下,2W BEV 的总拥有成本才会低于 ICEV。相比之下,在假定的未来政策下,即使有政府补贴,拥有 4W BEV 的成本也更高。这项研究表明,如果车辆的年平均行驶距离超过了年平均行驶距离,那么 BEV 可能是一个更好的选择,而且对于出租车队运营或叫车服务等利基应用也很有意义。目前对 4W 汽车的鼓励措施远远多于 2W 汽车,这意味着补贴不成比例地分配给了能买得起 4W 汽车的富人。到 2030 年,印度政府每年需要用于补贴的资金、因销量下降造成的燃油税损失,以及为 BEV 提供的免税优惠,可能高达 1460.62 亿美元(即 190 亿美元),相当于人均约 973 美元,这还不包括建设充电基础设施所需的投资。因此,印度需要一个有针对性的补贴分配计划,优先考虑 2W 和分阶段战略,以便有序、包容地过渡到可持续交通的未来。 图表摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信