Deepak Kumar, Amir F. N. Abdul-Manan, Gautam Kalghatgi, A. Agarwal
{"title":"Economic Competitiveness of Battery Electric Vehicles vs Internal\n Combustion Engine Vehicles in India: A Case Study for Two- and\n Four-Wheelers","authors":"Deepak Kumar, Amir F. N. Abdul-Manan, Gautam Kalghatgi, A. Agarwal","doi":"10.4271/13-05-02-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The initial cost of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is higher than internal\n combustion engine-powered vehicles (ICEVs) due to expensive batteries. Various\n factors affect the total cost of ownership of a vehicle. In India, consumers are\n concerned with a vehicle’s initial purchase cost and prefer owning an economical\n vehicle. The higher cost and shorter range of BEVs compared to ICEVs severely\n limit their penetration in the Indian market. However, government subsidies and\n incentives support BEVs. The total cost of ownership assessment is used to\n evaluate the entire cost of a vehicle to find the most economical option among\n different powertrains. This study compares 2W (two-wheeler) and 4W\n (four-wheeler) BEV’s cost vis-à-vis equivalent ICEVs in Delhi and Mumbai. The\n cost analysis assesses the current and future government policies to promote\n BEVs. Two assumed policies were applied to estimate future scenarios. Annual\n distance traveled, battery replacement assumptions, and fuel/electricity prices\n were used for sensitivity analyses. It was found that the total cost of\n ownership of 2W BEVs in Mumbai and Delhi was lower than the ICEVs, only if\n heavily supported by government subsidies and incentives. In contrast, with\n assumed future policies, owning 4W BEVs was costlier, even with government\n subsidies. This study showed that if a vehicle travels more than the average\n annual distance traveled, BEVs can be a better option and make sense for niche\n applications such as taxi fleet operations or ride-hailing services. The current\n incentives were much more for 4W than 2W, implying a disproportionate allocation\n of subsidies to the wealthier, who can afford 4W vehicles. The funds required\n for subsidies, losses in fuel taxes because of lower sales, and tax exemptions\n offered to BEVs could cost up to ₹146,062 crores (i.e., $19 billion) annually to\n the Indian government in 2030, which is ~ ₹973 per capita, excluding investments\n required to build charging infrastructure. Therefore, India needs a targeted\n subsidy allocation plan, prioritizing 2W, and a phased strategy for an orderly\n and inclusive transition to a sustainable mobility future.\n\n \n\n Graphical Abstract\n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":181105,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Energy, Environment, & Policy","volume":"15 S9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Energy, Environment, & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/13-05-02-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The initial cost of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is higher than internal
combustion engine-powered vehicles (ICEVs) due to expensive batteries. Various
factors affect the total cost of ownership of a vehicle. In India, consumers are
concerned with a vehicle’s initial purchase cost and prefer owning an economical
vehicle. The higher cost and shorter range of BEVs compared to ICEVs severely
limit their penetration in the Indian market. However, government subsidies and
incentives support BEVs. The total cost of ownership assessment is used to
evaluate the entire cost of a vehicle to find the most economical option among
different powertrains. This study compares 2W (two-wheeler) and 4W
(four-wheeler) BEV’s cost vis-à-vis equivalent ICEVs in Delhi and Mumbai. The
cost analysis assesses the current and future government policies to promote
BEVs. Two assumed policies were applied to estimate future scenarios. Annual
distance traveled, battery replacement assumptions, and fuel/electricity prices
were used for sensitivity analyses. It was found that the total cost of
ownership of 2W BEVs in Mumbai and Delhi was lower than the ICEVs, only if
heavily supported by government subsidies and incentives. In contrast, with
assumed future policies, owning 4W BEVs was costlier, even with government
subsidies. This study showed that if a vehicle travels more than the average
annual distance traveled, BEVs can be a better option and make sense for niche
applications such as taxi fleet operations or ride-hailing services. The current
incentives were much more for 4W than 2W, implying a disproportionate allocation
of subsidies to the wealthier, who can afford 4W vehicles. The funds required
for subsidies, losses in fuel taxes because of lower sales, and tax exemptions
offered to BEVs could cost up to ₹146,062 crores (i.e., $19 billion) annually to
the Indian government in 2030, which is ~ ₹973 per capita, excluding investments
required to build charging infrastructure. Therefore, India needs a targeted
subsidy allocation plan, prioritizing 2W, and a phased strategy for an orderly
and inclusive transition to a sustainable mobility future.
Graphical Abstract