Participatory research in energy justice: Guiding principles and practice

Laura Castro-Diaz, O. Nwadiaru, Anais Roque, Nicholas Caverly, Alison Kenner, Krista Harper
{"title":"Participatory research in energy justice: Guiding principles and practice","authors":"Laura Castro-Diaz, O. Nwadiaru, Anais Roque, Nicholas Caverly, Alison Kenner, Krista Harper","doi":"10.1088/2516-1083/ad3b60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This perspective explores the imperative role of participatory research (PR) in advancing energy justice. We argue that using participatory research methods and principles at the intersection of energy and equity is a critical research advantage. Here, we contend that PR frameworks are integral to bridging the gap between energy justice theory and practice, emphasizing the need to move beyond decontextualized principles to address specific injustices related to race, class, gender, and coloniality. We present three energy justice case studies that used participatory approaches in diverse contexts: Amazon, Brazil; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; and Holyoke, Massachusetts, USA. These cases showcase the versatility of PR methods in understanding and addressing unique energy challenges within local communities. We highlight guiding principles of PR, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing community needs, respecting diverse expertise, building trust, designing for transparency and accountability, choosing appropriate methods, adapting and being flexible, and aiming for long-term collaboration. Lastly, our perspective suggests future directions for participatory energy justice research, including the potential for PR to inform multiscalar policy, practice, and advocacy. We underscore the importance of collaborations between university researchers and community organizations through citizen science, emphasizing the need for diverse disciplinary perspectives to effectively address complex energy justice challenges.","PeriodicalId":501831,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/ad3b60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This perspective explores the imperative role of participatory research (PR) in advancing energy justice. We argue that using participatory research methods and principles at the intersection of energy and equity is a critical research advantage. Here, we contend that PR frameworks are integral to bridging the gap between energy justice theory and practice, emphasizing the need to move beyond decontextualized principles to address specific injustices related to race, class, gender, and coloniality. We present three energy justice case studies that used participatory approaches in diverse contexts: Amazon, Brazil; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; and Holyoke, Massachusetts, USA. These cases showcase the versatility of PR methods in understanding and addressing unique energy challenges within local communities. We highlight guiding principles of PR, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing community needs, respecting diverse expertise, building trust, designing for transparency and accountability, choosing appropriate methods, adapting and being flexible, and aiming for long-term collaboration. Lastly, our perspective suggests future directions for participatory energy justice research, including the potential for PR to inform multiscalar policy, practice, and advocacy. We underscore the importance of collaborations between university researchers and community organizations through citizen science, emphasizing the need for diverse disciplinary perspectives to effectively address complex energy justice challenges.
参与式能源公正研究:指导原则与实践
本视角探讨了参与式研究(PR)在促进能源公正方面的重要作用。我们认为,在能源与公平的交汇点使用参与式研究方法和原则是一项重要的研究优势。在此,我们认为,参与式研究框架是弥合能源公正理论与实践之间差距不可或缺的一部分,强调需要超越脱离实际的原则,解决与种族、阶级、性别和殖民地相关的具体不公正问题。我们介绍了三个在不同背景下采用参与式方法的能源公正案例研究:巴西亚马逊、美国宾夕法尼亚州费城和美国马萨诸塞州霍利约克。这些案例展示了公关方法在理解和应对当地社区独特的能源挑战方面的多功能性。我们强调了公关的指导原则,强调了优先考虑社区需求、尊重不同的专业知识、建立信任、设计透明度和问责制、选择适当的方法、适应性和灵活性以及以长期合作为目标的重要性。最后,我们提出了参与式能源公正研究的未来方向,包括公关为多部门政策、实践和宣传提供信息的潜力。我们强调了大学研究人员与社区组织通过公民科学开展合作的重要性,并强调需要多元化的学科视角来有效应对复杂的能源公正挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信