COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF TWO REHABILITATION PROGRAMS ON SPINAL MOBILITY AND PAIN INTENSITY IN PATIENTS WITH SPINAL DISCOPATHY

Andrii O. Goliachenko
{"title":"COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF TWO REHABILITATION PROGRAMS ON SPINAL MOBILITY AND PAIN INTENSITY IN PATIENTS WITH SPINAL DISCOPATHY","authors":"Andrii O. Goliachenko","doi":"10.31612/2616-4868.2.2024.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Approximately 80% of people experience back pain throughout their lives. A common problem of patients with low back pain is a significant limitation of mobility. Rehabilitation programs are usually recommended. Programs should include exercises that build flexibility, endurance, and strength. Kinesiotherapy is complemented by physiotherapy procedures, which are mainly aimed at analgesic and relaxing effects. \nThe aim of the study was to compare the effect of two rehabilitation programs that differ in the type of kinesiotherapy on the mobility of the lumbar spine and the level of pain intensity in people with L5-S1 segment discopathy. \nMaterials and methods. The study involved 30 patients undergoing 14 days of rehabilitation treatment. The criterion for dividing the subjects into groups was the method of kinesitherapy. The first group (Gr1) consisted of 15 patients who did gymnastics in the pool twice a day, and the second group (Gr2) consisted of 15 patients who attended therapeutic gymnastics classes in the gym twice a day. The exercises were aimed at improving the range of motion of the spine, strength and endurance of postural muscles. A visual analog scale was used to assess the intensity of pain. The distance between standard anthropometric points in the resting position and in the extreme position of movement was measured to assess the range of spinal movements. \nResults. After rehabilitation, the amplitude of movements of the lumbar spine increased in most patients. In Gr1, an increase in the range of forward spinal flexion by 9.2 cm (p = 0.001), rotation to the right by 0.63 cm (p = 0.03), and to the left by 1.33 cm (p = 0.007) was detected. In Gr2, the range of forward flexion increased by 12.6 cm (p = 0.005), left rotation by 0.94 cm (p = 0.035), and right flexion by 1.41 cm (p = 0.002). In the case of other movements, no statistically significant changes were found. \nIn Gr1, the average pain intensity according to the VAS was 4.9 ± 2.3 points before the start of the physiotherapy program and 3.6 ± 1.7 points after its completion (p = 0.04). In Gr2, the VAS values were 5.1 ± 2.5 points and 3.9 ± 1.8 points, respectively (p = 0.03). The magnitude of changes in pain intensity was similar (-1.3 points and -1.2 points) for both programs. \nConclusions. 1. The applied rehabilitation programs increased the mobility of the lumbar spine and reduced pain in patients with L5-S1 segment discopathy. 2. Both the hydrokinesitherapy program and the gym program were equally effective in increasing the range of motion of the spine and reducing the intensity of pain.","PeriodicalId":502404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.2.2024.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Approximately 80% of people experience back pain throughout their lives. A common problem of patients with low back pain is a significant limitation of mobility. Rehabilitation programs are usually recommended. Programs should include exercises that build flexibility, endurance, and strength. Kinesiotherapy is complemented by physiotherapy procedures, which are mainly aimed at analgesic and relaxing effects. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of two rehabilitation programs that differ in the type of kinesiotherapy on the mobility of the lumbar spine and the level of pain intensity in people with L5-S1 segment discopathy. Materials and methods. The study involved 30 patients undergoing 14 days of rehabilitation treatment. The criterion for dividing the subjects into groups was the method of kinesitherapy. The first group (Gr1) consisted of 15 patients who did gymnastics in the pool twice a day, and the second group (Gr2) consisted of 15 patients who attended therapeutic gymnastics classes in the gym twice a day. The exercises were aimed at improving the range of motion of the spine, strength and endurance of postural muscles. A visual analog scale was used to assess the intensity of pain. The distance between standard anthropometric points in the resting position and in the extreme position of movement was measured to assess the range of spinal movements. Results. After rehabilitation, the amplitude of movements of the lumbar spine increased in most patients. In Gr1, an increase in the range of forward spinal flexion by 9.2 cm (p = 0.001), rotation to the right by 0.63 cm (p = 0.03), and to the left by 1.33 cm (p = 0.007) was detected. In Gr2, the range of forward flexion increased by 12.6 cm (p = 0.005), left rotation by 0.94 cm (p = 0.035), and right flexion by 1.41 cm (p = 0.002). In the case of other movements, no statistically significant changes were found. In Gr1, the average pain intensity according to the VAS was 4.9 ± 2.3 points before the start of the physiotherapy program and 3.6 ± 1.7 points after its completion (p = 0.04). In Gr2, the VAS values were 5.1 ± 2.5 points and 3.9 ± 1.8 points, respectively (p = 0.03). The magnitude of changes in pain intensity was similar (-1.3 points and -1.2 points) for both programs. Conclusions. 1. The applied rehabilitation programs increased the mobility of the lumbar spine and reduced pain in patients with L5-S1 segment discopathy. 2. Both the hydrokinesitherapy program and the gym program were equally effective in increasing the range of motion of the spine and reducing the intensity of pain.
比较两种康复计划对脊柱椎间盘病变患者脊柱活动度和疼痛强度的影响
简介大约 80% 的人一生中都会经历腰痛。腰背痛患者的一个常见问题是活动能力严重受限。通常会推荐康复计划。康复计划应包括锻炼柔韧性、耐力和力量的运动。运动疗法与物理疗法相辅相成,物理疗法的主要目的是镇痛和放松。本研究旨在比较两种康复计划对腰椎活动度和 L5-S1 节段椎间盘病变患者疼痛强度的影响,这两种计划的运动疗法类型各不相同。材料与方法研究涉及 30 名接受 14 天康复治疗的患者。以运动疗法方法为标准将受试者分为几组。第一组(Gr1)的 15 名患者每天两次在游泳池做体操,第二组(Gr2)的 15 名患者每天两次在健身房参加治疗体操课。练习的目的是改善脊柱的活动范围、姿势肌的力量和耐力。采用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛强度。测量静止位置和运动极限位置的标准人体测量点之间的距离,以评估脊柱的运动范围。结果显示康复后,大多数患者的腰椎运动幅度都有所增加。在 Gr1 中,脊柱前屈的幅度增加了 9.2 厘米(p = 0.001),向右旋转增加了 0.63 厘米(p = 0.03),向左旋转增加了 1.33 厘米(p = 0.007)。在 Gr2 中,前屈的幅度增加了 12.6 厘米(p = 0.005),左旋增加了 0.94 厘米(p = 0.035),右屈增加了 1.41 厘米(p = 0.002)。在其他动作方面,没有发现有统计学意义的变化。在 Gr1 中,物理治疗计划开始前的 VAS 平均疼痛强度为 4.9 ± 2.3 点,物理治疗计划结束后为 3.6 ± 1.7 点(p = 0.04)。在 Gr2 中,VAS 值分别为 5.1 ± 2.5 分和 3.9 ± 1.8 分(p = 0.03)。两个项目的疼痛强度变化幅度相似(-1.3 点和-1.2 点)。结论1.应用的康复计划增加了腰椎的活动度,减轻了 L5-S1 椎间盘病变患者的疼痛。2.2. 水动力疗法项目和健身房项目在增加脊柱活动范围和减轻疼痛强度方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信