CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF THE INTERDEPENDENCE OF ECONOMY'S INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY INDICES

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
A. Kniazevych, R. Strilchuk, Serhii O. Kraychuk
{"title":"CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF THE INTERDEPENDENCE OF ECONOMY'S INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY INDICES","authors":"A. Kniazevych, R. Strilchuk, Serhii O. Kraychuk","doi":"10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-1-112-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creativity and the generation of innovative solutions are means of solving the problems of slow economic development and resistance to instability that have been observed in recent years. The key role of creativity of individuals and groups of workers as a defining feature of modern economic life is increasingly recognised. There is a consensus that people, as a source of creativity, are now a critical resource of the new era. In the new model of economic development, creativity, knowledge and free access to information are seen as powerful drivers of development and catalysts of globalisation. The subject of the research is to study the relationship between innovation and creativity in the economic sphere. In particular, the article examines how the creativity of various economic subjects affects the level of innovative indicators, which synthetically reflect the possibilities of achieving the goals of innovative development. The research methodology includes the use of global reports on innovation and creativity indices, as well as scientific sources on this topic. The study uses the methods of critical analysis of scientific papers and international rankings, comparison and correlation of interdependent indicators. The purpose of the research is to assess the relationship between creativity and the level of innovative indicators, which synthetically show the possibilities of achieving the goals of innovative development. Creativity of business entities and mechanisms for generating innovative solutions are determining factors of success of modern post-industrial societies. In most developed countries, long-term economic growth is supported by innovation and creativity of various economic entities. To create the research algorithm, the authors defined the chain of concepts \"sustainable development – innovation – creativity\". To assess and analyse creativity, the study uses methodological tools that can be applied in global and local contexts. The most well-known indices are the Global Innovation Index (GII), the Global Creativity Index (GCI), the City Creativity Index (CCI), and the Hong Kong Creativity Index (HKCI). The general correlation coefficients between the global innovation index and the creativity indices of some countries have been calculated. According to the results of the calculations, the correlation coefficients of creativity and innovation are very positive. They are closely related and belong to the group of significantly correlated indicators. This means that there is a very high correlation between innovation and creativity in the economies studied. Conclusions. The positive correlation between innovation and creativity indices confirms, in general and in specific terms, a close relationship between innovation and creativity in the economies of different countries. This may indicate that countries or regions with a higher level of economic development have higher rates of creativity and vice versa. The research demonstrates the importance of innovation for the development of creativity in the economy. Understanding this interaction can serve as a basis for designing strategies and policies aimed at promoting innovative development and the growth of creative potential. The economies of Poland, Bulgaria and Ukraine, which were studied in detail, are not innovative enough. The countries studied represent different levels of economic development and are in the phase of post-industrial development, which requires effective innovation policies and measures to support creativity. In order to increase the level of innovation and creativity, it is necessary to involve national governments and organisations (especially the European Union) that can contribute to this. The conclusions point to the need to develop comprehensive approaches to support innovation and creativity in the economies of the countries studied. This may include not only effective strategies to stimulate research and development, but also policies aimed at the cultural environment, education and other areas.","PeriodicalId":44766,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-1-112-121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creativity and the generation of innovative solutions are means of solving the problems of slow economic development and resistance to instability that have been observed in recent years. The key role of creativity of individuals and groups of workers as a defining feature of modern economic life is increasingly recognised. There is a consensus that people, as a source of creativity, are now a critical resource of the new era. In the new model of economic development, creativity, knowledge and free access to information are seen as powerful drivers of development and catalysts of globalisation. The subject of the research is to study the relationship between innovation and creativity in the economic sphere. In particular, the article examines how the creativity of various economic subjects affects the level of innovative indicators, which synthetically reflect the possibilities of achieving the goals of innovative development. The research methodology includes the use of global reports on innovation and creativity indices, as well as scientific sources on this topic. The study uses the methods of critical analysis of scientific papers and international rankings, comparison and correlation of interdependent indicators. The purpose of the research is to assess the relationship between creativity and the level of innovative indicators, which synthetically show the possibilities of achieving the goals of innovative development. Creativity of business entities and mechanisms for generating innovative solutions are determining factors of success of modern post-industrial societies. In most developed countries, long-term economic growth is supported by innovation and creativity of various economic entities. To create the research algorithm, the authors defined the chain of concepts "sustainable development – innovation – creativity". To assess and analyse creativity, the study uses methodological tools that can be applied in global and local contexts. The most well-known indices are the Global Innovation Index (GII), the Global Creativity Index (GCI), the City Creativity Index (CCI), and the Hong Kong Creativity Index (HKCI). The general correlation coefficients between the global innovation index and the creativity indices of some countries have been calculated. According to the results of the calculations, the correlation coefficients of creativity and innovation are very positive. They are closely related and belong to the group of significantly correlated indicators. This means that there is a very high correlation between innovation and creativity in the economies studied. Conclusions. The positive correlation between innovation and creativity indices confirms, in general and in specific terms, a close relationship between innovation and creativity in the economies of different countries. This may indicate that countries or regions with a higher level of economic development have higher rates of creativity and vice versa. The research demonstrates the importance of innovation for the development of creativity in the economy. Understanding this interaction can serve as a basis for designing strategies and policies aimed at promoting innovative development and the growth of creative potential. The economies of Poland, Bulgaria and Ukraine, which were studied in detail, are not innovative enough. The countries studied represent different levels of economic development and are in the phase of post-industrial development, which requires effective innovation policies and measures to support creativity. In order to increase the level of innovation and creativity, it is necessary to involve national governments and organisations (especially the European Union) that can contribute to this. The conclusions point to the need to develop comprehensive approaches to support innovation and creativity in the economies of the countries studied. This may include not only effective strategies to stimulate research and development, but also policies aimed at the cultural environment, education and other areas.
经济创新和创造力指数相互依存的相关性分析
创造力和创新解决方案是解决近年来出现的经济发展缓慢和抵制不稳定问题的手段。作为现代经济生活的一个决定性特征,个人和工人群体的创造力所发挥的关键作用日益得到认可。人们一致认为,人作为创造力的源泉,是新时代的重要资源。在新的经济发展模式中,创造力、知识和自由获取信息被视为发展的强大动力和全球化的催化剂。本研究的主题是研究经济领域中创新与创造力之间的关系。文章特别研究了各种经济主体的创造力如何影响创新指标的水平,这些指标综合反映了实现创新发展目标的可能性。研究方法包括使用有关创新和创造力指数的全球报告,以及有关该主题的科学资料。研究采用了对科学论文和国际排名进行批判性分析、对相互依存的指标进行比较和关联的方法。研究的目的是评估创造力与创新指标水平之间的关系,这些指标综合显示了实现创新发展目标的可能性。企业实体的创造力和产生创新解决方案的机制是现代后工业社会取得成功的决定性因素。在大多数发达国家,各种经济实体的创新和创造力支撑着长期经济增长。为了建立研究算法,作者定义了 "可持续发展--创新--创造力 "的概念链。为了评估和分析创造力,本研究使用了可适用于全球和地方背景的方法工具。最著名的指数有全球创新指数(GII)、全球创造力指数(GCI)、城市创造力指数(CCI)和香港创造力指数(HKCI)。计算了全球创新指数与一些国家创造力指数之间的一般相关系数。根据计算结果,创造力与创新的相关系数非常正。它们密切相关,属于显著相关指标组。这意味着在所研究的经济体中,创新和创造力之间存在着非常高的相关性。结论创新和创造力指数之间的正相关性从总体和具体两个方面证实了不同国家经济中创新和创造力之间的密切关系。这可能表明,经济发展水平较高的国家或地区创造力较强,反之亦然。研究表明,创新对经济中创造力的发展非常重要。了解这种互动关系可以作为制定旨在促进创新发展和创造潜力增长的战略和政策的基础。详细研究了波兰、保加利亚和乌克兰的经济,它们的创新能力不足。所研究的国家代表了不同的经济发展水平,处于后工业发展阶段,需要有效的创新政策和措施来支持创造力。为了提高创新和创造力水平,各国政府和组织(尤其是欧盟)有必要参与进来,共同为此做出贡献。结论指出,有必要制定全面的方法来支持所研究国家经济中的创新和创造力。这可能不仅包括刺激研究与开发的有效战略,还包括针对文化环境、教育和其他领域的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信