Content analysis of NOC outcomes related to mechanical ventilation in people with COVID-19

Erika Silva de Sá, Aline Batista Maurício, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Larissa Gabrielle Dias Vieira, Vinícius Batista Santos, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite de Barros, Viviane Martins da Silva
{"title":"Content analysis of NOC outcomes related to mechanical ventilation in people with COVID-19","authors":"Erika Silva de Sá, Aline Batista Maurício, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Larissa Gabrielle Dias Vieira, Vinícius Batista Santos, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite de Barros, Viviane Martins da Silva","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0343en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the evidence of content validity of the Nursing Outcomes “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult”, for patients with severe COVID-19. Method: Methodological study developed in two stages: literature review to construct the definitions of the indicators and analysis of the evidence of content validity of the nursing outcomes by a focus group. Results: All the conceptual and operational definitions developed for the 56 indicators were considered clear and precise. However, 17 indicators were excluded because they were deemed not to be relevant. The definitions of the magnitudes for 17 indicators of the Nursing Outcome “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and 22 indicators “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult” were thus constructed. Conclusion: The development of definitions and validation by experts makes the use of these outcomes and their indicators more understandable and precise, favoring their use in clinical practice and providing greater detail in assessment and recording.","PeriodicalId":21253,"journal":{"name":"Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da Usp","volume":"38 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da Usp","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0343en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the evidence of content validity of the Nursing Outcomes “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult”, for patients with severe COVID-19. Method: Methodological study developed in two stages: literature review to construct the definitions of the indicators and analysis of the evidence of content validity of the nursing outcomes by a focus group. Results: All the conceptual and operational definitions developed for the 56 indicators were considered clear and precise. However, 17 indicators were excluded because they were deemed not to be relevant. The definitions of the magnitudes for 17 indicators of the Nursing Outcome “Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult” and 22 indicators “Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult” were thus constructed. Conclusion: The development of definitions and validation by experts makes the use of these outcomes and their indicators more understandable and precise, favoring their use in clinical practice and providing greater detail in assessment and recording.
与 COVID-19 患者机械通气相关的 NOC 结果的内容分析
ABSTRACT Objective:分析护理结果 "机械通气反应:成人 "和 "机械通气断奶反应:成人 "的内容效度证据:成人 "和 "机械通气断流反应:成人 "和 "机械通气断流反应:成人 "护理结果的内容有效性证据。方法:分两个阶段进行方法学研究:通过文献综述构建指标定义,通过焦点小组分析护理结果内容有效性的证据。结果:所有为 56 个指标制定的概念和操作定义都被认为是清晰和准确的。然而,有 17 项指标被排除在外,因为它们被认为不相关。护理结果 "机械通气反应 "中 17 个指标的大小定义:成人 "和 22 个指标 "机械通气断奶反应:成人 "22 项指标的大小定义。结论定义的制定和专家的验证使这些结果及其指标的使用更加易懂和精确,有利于在临床实践中使用,并为评估和记录提供了更多细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信