SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF HOME-BASED AND OUTPATIENT PROGRAMS OF PHYSICAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH FROZEN SHOULDER AND MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME

A. P. Rusanov, V. Vitomskyi, I. Roi, N. Borzykh, M. Vitomskа
{"title":"SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF HOME-BASED AND OUTPATIENT PROGRAMS OF PHYSICAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH FROZEN SHOULDER AND MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME","authors":"A. P. Rusanov, V. Vitomskyi, I. Roi, N. Borzykh, M. Vitomskа","doi":"10.31612/2616-4868.2.2024.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim: is to compare short-term results of home-based and outpatient programs of physical therapy among patients with frozen shoulder and concomitant thoracic myofascial pain syndrome. \nMaterials and methods. The study involved 80 patients. The range of motion in the shoulder joint affected by capsulitis was assessed. A numerical pain scale was used to assess pain sensations when pressing on trigger points. Functional limitations in the shoulder were measured by means of the Oxford Shoulder Score (before and 1.5 months after the end of the physical therapy). Participants were divided into two groups: home-based group (HG) and outpatient group (ОG). All the patients were consulted by a physical therapist. ОG patients received end-range mobilization with the assistance of a physical therapist 5 times a week to improve shoulder joint mobility. Most of ОG participants received 15 procedures (3 weeks). Patients HG performed therapeutic exercises without any assistance at home. (twice a day, 3 weeks). In terms of trigger points therapy, the patients performed ischemic compression without any assistance. \nResults. Patients of both groups demonstrated positive dynamics of the studied indicators. Comparison of the short-term results of the therapy according to range of motion and pain showed better indicators in the ОG. Comparison of the initial results of the groups in Oxford Shoulder Score items did not reveal any significant differences. Total score was 18.2±6.5 points in ОG and 17.6±7.5 points in HG (p=0.715). Me (25%; 75%) values were 17.5 (12.5; 23.8) and 18 (13; 23.5) points, respectively. Comparison of the final results of the groups in Oxford Shoulder Score items revealed significant differences. Total score was 47 (47; 48) points in ОG and 33 (31; 35.75) points in HG (p<0.001). x̅±SD values were 46.5±2.6 and 32.8±4.4 points, respectively. \nConclusions. Short-term results of the outpatient program in terms of pain indicators, mobility of the shoulder joint and functional limitations were better as compared to the home-based program of physical therapy in patients with frozen shoulder and concomitant thoracic myofascial pain syndrome.","PeriodicalId":502404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","volume":"41 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.2.2024.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim: is to compare short-term results of home-based and outpatient programs of physical therapy among patients with frozen shoulder and concomitant thoracic myofascial pain syndrome. Materials and methods. The study involved 80 patients. The range of motion in the shoulder joint affected by capsulitis was assessed. A numerical pain scale was used to assess pain sensations when pressing on trigger points. Functional limitations in the shoulder were measured by means of the Oxford Shoulder Score (before and 1.5 months after the end of the physical therapy). Participants were divided into two groups: home-based group (HG) and outpatient group (ОG). All the patients were consulted by a physical therapist. ОG patients received end-range mobilization with the assistance of a physical therapist 5 times a week to improve shoulder joint mobility. Most of ОG participants received 15 procedures (3 weeks). Patients HG performed therapeutic exercises without any assistance at home. (twice a day, 3 weeks). In terms of trigger points therapy, the patients performed ischemic compression without any assistance. Results. Patients of both groups demonstrated positive dynamics of the studied indicators. Comparison of the short-term results of the therapy according to range of motion and pain showed better indicators in the ОG. Comparison of the initial results of the groups in Oxford Shoulder Score items did not reveal any significant differences. Total score was 18.2±6.5 points in ОG and 17.6±7.5 points in HG (p=0.715). Me (25%; 75%) values were 17.5 (12.5; 23.8) and 18 (13; 23.5) points, respectively. Comparison of the final results of the groups in Oxford Shoulder Score items revealed significant differences. Total score was 47 (47; 48) points in ОG and 33 (31; 35.75) points in HG (p<0.001). x̅±SD values were 46.5±2.6 and 32.8±4.4 points, respectively. Conclusions. Short-term results of the outpatient program in terms of pain indicators, mobility of the shoulder joint and functional limitations were better as compared to the home-based program of physical therapy in patients with frozen shoulder and concomitant thoracic myofascial pain syndrome.
肩周炎和肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者在家接受物理治疗和门诊治疗的短期疗效
目的:比较肩周炎合并胸肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者接受家庭理疗和门诊理疗的短期效果。材料和方法研究涉及 80 名患者。对肩周炎患者肩关节的活动范围进行了评估。采用疼痛数字量表评估按压触发点时的疼痛感觉。通过牛津肩关节评分(物理治疗前和结束后 1.5 个月)测量肩关节的功能限制。参与者分为两组:在家治疗组(HG)和门诊治疗组(ОG)。所有患者都接受了物理治疗师的咨询。在物理治疗师的协助下,ОG 组患者每周接受 5 次肩关节末端活动训练,以改善肩关节活动度。大多数ОG患者接受了15次治疗(3周)。患者在家中无需任何协助即可进行治疗性锻炼。(每天两次,3 周)。在触发点治疗方面,患者在没有任何辅助的情况下进行缺血按压。结果显示两组患者在研究指标方面均表现出积极的动态变化。根据活动范围和疼痛对治疗的短期效果进行比较后发现,ОG 组的指标更好。总分ОG为18.2±6.5分,HG为17.6±7.5分(P=0.715)。Me (25%; 75%) 值分别为 17.5 (12.5; 23.8) 分和 18 (13; 23.5) 分。比较各组在牛津肩关节评分项目上的最终结果,发现差异显著。总分ОG为47(47;48)分,HG为33(31;35.75)分(P<0.001)。x̅±SD 值分别为 46.5±2.6 分和 32.8±4.4 分。结论在肩周炎合并胸肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者的疼痛指标、肩关节活动度和功能限制方面,门诊治疗方案的短期疗效优于家庭理疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信