Assessing Clinical Profile and Short-term Outcomes of Neonates Retrieved by Neonatal Transport Service and Their Co-relation with Neonatal Severity Illness Scores: An Observational Study

Q4 Medicine
Neetha M. Reddy, Rajath Athreya
{"title":"Assessing Clinical Profile and Short-term Outcomes of Neonates Retrieved by Neonatal Transport Service and Their Co-relation with Neonatal Severity Illness Scores: An Observational Study","authors":"Neetha M. Reddy, Rajath Athreya","doi":"10.1177/09732179241238519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Newborn transport is a key component of neonatal perinatal care, and its delay is attributed highly to neonatal mortality. Aim: Our study aimed to assess the clinical profile and short-term outcomes (<48 hours of admission) and to apply the severity illness scores to know the impact on outcomes of retrieved neonates. We used Transport Risk Index of Physiological Stability (TRIPS II) score to correlate with short-term morbidities and Score of Neonatal Physiology Perinatal Extension (SNAPPE II) to correlate with overall outcomes of retrieved neonates. Materials and Methods: It was an observational study done on 160 out-born neonatal retrievals over 13 months by a dedicated transport team at a level III NICU in Bengaluru, India. A validated TRIPS II score was recorded pre-transport, at Admission and at 12 and 24 hours of admission, and the SNAPPE II score was recorded at admission. An ROC curve was used to predict the utility of these scores. Results: Among 141 eligible neonates, the common indication for transport was respiratory distress syndrome 57 (40.4%). Extreme pre-terms (<28 weeks; p = .001) and ELBW (<1000 g; p = .001) are associated with an increased mortality rate. The area under the curve (AUC) for TRIPS II in predicting pulmonary bleed (AUC of ROC 0.866, 0.833, 0.823, 0.836), IVH (0.776, 0.79, 0.78, 0.77), worsening of respiratory settings (0.786, 0.814, 0.78, 0.79), and increase in ionotropic support (0.882, 0.904, 0.904, 0.902) at pre-transport, at admission, at 12 hours, and at 24 hours, respectively, was good. The AUC for SNAPPE II was 0.895, which is good in predicting mortality. Conclusion: A dedicated neonatal transport service can reduce the mortality rate significantly to 7.8%. TRIPS II and SNAPPE II scores were good in predicting the morbidities and mortality in retrieved neonates.","PeriodicalId":16516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatology","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179241238519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Newborn transport is a key component of neonatal perinatal care, and its delay is attributed highly to neonatal mortality. Aim: Our study aimed to assess the clinical profile and short-term outcomes (<48 hours of admission) and to apply the severity illness scores to know the impact on outcomes of retrieved neonates. We used Transport Risk Index of Physiological Stability (TRIPS II) score to correlate with short-term morbidities and Score of Neonatal Physiology Perinatal Extension (SNAPPE II) to correlate with overall outcomes of retrieved neonates. Materials and Methods: It was an observational study done on 160 out-born neonatal retrievals over 13 months by a dedicated transport team at a level III NICU in Bengaluru, India. A validated TRIPS II score was recorded pre-transport, at Admission and at 12 and 24 hours of admission, and the SNAPPE II score was recorded at admission. An ROC curve was used to predict the utility of these scores. Results: Among 141 eligible neonates, the common indication for transport was respiratory distress syndrome 57 (40.4%). Extreme pre-terms (<28 weeks; p = .001) and ELBW (<1000 g; p = .001) are associated with an increased mortality rate. The area under the curve (AUC) for TRIPS II in predicting pulmonary bleed (AUC of ROC 0.866, 0.833, 0.823, 0.836), IVH (0.776, 0.79, 0.78, 0.77), worsening of respiratory settings (0.786, 0.814, 0.78, 0.79), and increase in ionotropic support (0.882, 0.904, 0.904, 0.902) at pre-transport, at admission, at 12 hours, and at 24 hours, respectively, was good. The AUC for SNAPPE II was 0.895, which is good in predicting mortality. Conclusion: A dedicated neonatal transport service can reduce the mortality rate significantly to 7.8%. TRIPS II and SNAPPE II scores were good in predicting the morbidities and mortality in retrieved neonates.
评估新生儿转运服务转运的新生儿的临床概况和短期疗效及其与新生儿疾病严重程度评分的关系:观察研究
导言:新生儿转运是新生儿围产期护理的关键环节,新生儿转运延迟是导致新生儿死亡的重要原因。目的:我们的研究旨在评估新生儿的临床概况和短期预后(入院时间小于 48 小时),并应用疾病严重程度评分来了解对转运新生儿预后的影响。我们使用生理稳定性运输风险指数(TRIPS II)评分与短期发病率相关,并使用围产期新生儿生理扩展评分(SNAPPE II)与复苏新生儿的总体预后相关。材料和方法:这是一项观察性研究,由印度班加罗尔一家三级新生儿重症监护室的专门转运团队在 13 个月内转运了 160 例新生儿。在转运前、入院时、入院 12 小时和 24 小时记录了经过验证的 TRIPS II 评分,在入院时记录了 SNAPPE II 评分。使用 ROC 曲线预测这些评分的效用。结果:在 141 名符合条件的新生儿中,常见的转运指征是呼吸窘迫综合征 57 例(40.4%)。极度早产(<28 周;p = .001)和 ELBW(<1000 克;p = .001)与死亡率增加有关。TRIPS II 预测肺出血(ROC 的 AUC 为 0.866、0.833、0.823、0.836)、IVH(0.776、0.79、0.78、0.77)、呼吸设置恶化(0.786,0.814,0.78,0.79)和离子支持增加(0.882,0.904,0.904,0.902)分别在转运前、入院时、12 小时时和 24 小时时表现良好。SNAPPE II 的 AUC 为 0.895,在预测死亡率方面表现良好。结论专门的新生儿转运服务可将死亡率大幅降至 7.8%。TRIPS II 和 SNAPPE II 评分能很好地预测转运新生儿的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatology
Journal of Neonatology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信