Do We Listen or Ignore Indigenous Practices? The Machobane Farming System - An Indigenous Farming Practice of Lesotho

S. Mekbib, A. Olaleye, Masia Johane, T. Wondimu
{"title":"Do We Listen or Ignore Indigenous Practices? The Machobane Farming System - An Indigenous Farming Practice of Lesotho","authors":"S. Mekbib, A. Olaleye, Masia Johane, T. Wondimu","doi":"10.9734/arja/2024/v17i2434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the adaptive capacity of the Machobane Farming System, an indigenous practice to improve soil fertility and maize productivity compared to other non-Machobane farming practices.  \nStudy design: The study was conducted in four agroecological zones of Lesotho: Mountain, Foothills, low lands and Senqu river valley. Soil samples were collected at random from the non-Machobane farming practicing fields and Machobane farming practicing fields and the soil physicochemical and microbiological analyses were conducted to evaluate the soil quality. Structured and non-structured questionnaires were used to gather information from Focus Group Discussion (FGD) on the type of farming practices used and other demographic data.\nResults and Discussion: The MfS were found to be less affected and resilient to climate change with multiple benefits such as moisture conservation, slow release of nutrients and cross migration of microorganisms to the intercropping plants in the field unlike other farming practicing fields. An increased number of soil fertility indicator microorganisms such as Bacillus spp and Nitrogen fixing bacteria were seen to have increased the production of food crops (P>0.05) almost all the year round. An intensive relay cropping of one acre would be sufficient to ensure food security for an average family of 5 members.\nConclusion: Currently, the Machobane Farming System (MfS) is adopted by many households in Lesotho using biochar and compost.","PeriodicalId":372539,"journal":{"name":"Asian Research Journal of Agriculture","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Research Journal of Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2024/v17i2434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the adaptive capacity of the Machobane Farming System, an indigenous practice to improve soil fertility and maize productivity compared to other non-Machobane farming practices.   Study design: The study was conducted in four agroecological zones of Lesotho: Mountain, Foothills, low lands and Senqu river valley. Soil samples were collected at random from the non-Machobane farming practicing fields and Machobane farming practicing fields and the soil physicochemical and microbiological analyses were conducted to evaluate the soil quality. Structured and non-structured questionnaires were used to gather information from Focus Group Discussion (FGD) on the type of farming practices used and other demographic data. Results and Discussion: The MfS were found to be less affected and resilient to climate change with multiple benefits such as moisture conservation, slow release of nutrients and cross migration of microorganisms to the intercropping plants in the field unlike other farming practicing fields. An increased number of soil fertility indicator microorganisms such as Bacillus spp and Nitrogen fixing bacteria were seen to have increased the production of food crops (P>0.05) almost all the year round. An intensive relay cropping of one acre would be sufficient to ensure food security for an average family of 5 members. Conclusion: Currently, the Machobane Farming System (MfS) is adopted by many households in Lesotho using biochar and compost.
我们是倾听还是忽视土著习俗?Machobane 耕作制度--莱索托的土著耕作方式
目的:与其他非马科巴内耕作法相比,评估马科巴内耕作法的适应能力,这是一种提高土壤肥力和玉米产量的本土耕作法。 研究设计:研究在莱索托的四个农业生态区进行:山区、山麓、低地和森库河谷。从非马科贝耕作法田地和马科贝耕作法田地随机采集土壤样本,并进行土壤理化和微生物分析,以评估土壤质量。采用结构化和非结构化问卷,从焦点小组讨论(FGD)中收集有关所采用的耕作方式类型和其他人口统计学数据的信息:研究发现,与其他耕作方式不同,间作土壤耕作方式对气候变化的影响较小,具有多种优势,如保墒、养分释放缓慢、微生物向田间间作植物交叉迁移等。土壤肥力指示微生物(如芽孢杆菌和固氮菌)数量的增加几乎全年都能提高粮食作物的产量(P>0.05)。一英亩的集约化接力种植足以确保一个普通 5 口之家的粮食安全:目前,莱索托许多家庭都在使用生物炭和堆肥,采用马科巴内耕作系统(MfS)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信