Analyzing the influence of hygienic and motivating factors on employee performance: Insights of HRM practices from university and industry settings

Zhandos Kudaibergenov, B. Bolatova, Aigul Kurmanalina, K. Balginova
{"title":"Analyzing the influence of hygienic and motivating factors on employee performance: Insights of HRM practices from university and industry settings","authors":"Zhandos Kudaibergenov, B. Bolatova, Aigul Kurmanalina, K. Balginova","doi":"10.15549/jeecar.v11i2.1429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many contemporary HRM systems have been developed based on motivation theories. Herzberg's theory of motivation serves as a methodology for examining and constructing motivation systems within organizations. This study aims to uncover the relationship between respondents' descriptive characteristics and hygienic/motivating factors and their impact on employee performance in the university and the industry. Employing a questionnaire method and utilizing Likert's 5-point scale for assessment, the authors collected, coded, and analyzed data using the SPSS Statistics Program. The study establishes the influence of hygienic and motivating factors on employee performance. When the hygienic factor increases by one unit, university employees' performance decreases by 0.239 units. In industry, it decreases by 0.085. Both research subjects showcase a direct relationship between performance and motivating factors, demonstrating a positive correlation. When the motivating factors see an increase of one unit, university employees' performance likewise increases by 0.643 units. In the Industry context, this rise in motivation corresponds to a 0.245 unit increase. Within the two-factor theory framework, both factors are deemed significant for employees, yet providing motivating factors is considered more crucial. Enhanced motivation through equitable and adequate stimuli practices corresponds to increased employee performance.","PeriodicalId":127595,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR)","volume":"37 132","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v11i2.1429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many contemporary HRM systems have been developed based on motivation theories. Herzberg's theory of motivation serves as a methodology for examining and constructing motivation systems within organizations. This study aims to uncover the relationship between respondents' descriptive characteristics and hygienic/motivating factors and their impact on employee performance in the university and the industry. Employing a questionnaire method and utilizing Likert's 5-point scale for assessment, the authors collected, coded, and analyzed data using the SPSS Statistics Program. The study establishes the influence of hygienic and motivating factors on employee performance. When the hygienic factor increases by one unit, university employees' performance decreases by 0.239 units. In industry, it decreases by 0.085. Both research subjects showcase a direct relationship between performance and motivating factors, demonstrating a positive correlation. When the motivating factors see an increase of one unit, university employees' performance likewise increases by 0.643 units. In the Industry context, this rise in motivation corresponds to a 0.245 unit increase. Within the two-factor theory framework, both factors are deemed significant for employees, yet providing motivating factors is considered more crucial. Enhanced motivation through equitable and adequate stimuli practices corresponds to increased employee performance.
分析卫生和激励因素对员工绩效的影响:来自大学和企业的人力资源管理实践启示
当代许多人力资源管理制度都是以激励理论为基础发展起来的。赫茨伯格的激励理论是研究和构建组织内部激励体系的方法论。本研究旨在揭示受访者的描述性特征与卫生/激励因素之间的关系及其对大学和行业员工绩效的影响。作者采用问卷调查法和李克特五点量表进行评估,并使用 SPSS 统计程序对数据进行了收集、编码和分析。研究确定了卫生和激励因素对员工绩效的影响。当卫生因素增加一个单位时,大学员工的绩效下降 0.239 个单位。在工业领域,则下降 0.085 个单位。这两个研究对象都显示出绩效与激励因素之间的直接关系,呈现出正相关。当激励因素增加一个单位时,大学员工的绩效同样会增加 0.643 个单位。在行业背景下,激励因素的增加相当于 0.245 个单位的增长。在双因素理论框架内,两个因素都被认为对员工具有重要意义,但提供激励因素被认为更为重要。通过公平和适当的激励措施提高员工的积极性,就能提高员工的绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信