Level One Trauma Center Proliferation May Worsen Patient Outcomes.

Michael Zhou, Taylor W. Norton, Kelsey Rupp, Rebecca J Paxton, Michele S Wang, Nisha S Rehman, Jack C. He
{"title":"Level One Trauma Center Proliferation May Worsen Patient Outcomes.","authors":"Michael Zhou, Taylor W. Norton, Kelsey Rupp, Rebecca J Paxton, Michele S Wang, Nisha S Rehman, Jack C. He","doi":"10.1177/00031348241244647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nFrom 2013 to 2020, Arizona state trauma system expanded from seven to thirteen level 1 trauma centers (L1TCs). This study utilized the state trauma registry to analyze the effect of L1TC proliferation on patient outcomes.\n\n\nMETHODS\nAdult patients age≥15 in the state trauma registry from 2007-2020 were queried for demographic, injury, and outcome variables. These variables were compared across the 2 time periods: 2007-2012 as pre-proliferation (PRE) and 2013-2020 as post-proliferation (POST). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess independent predictors of mortality. Subgroup analyses were done for Injury Severity Score (ISS)≥15, age≥65, and trauma mechanisms.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 482,896 trauma patients were included in this study. 40% were female, 29% were geriatric patients, and 8.6% sustained penetrating trauma. The median ISS was 4. Inpatient mortality overall was 2.7%. POST consisted of more female, geriatric, and blunt trauma patients (P < .001). Both periods had similar median ISS. POST had more interfacility transfers (14.5% vs 10.3%, P < .001). Inpatient, unadjusted mortality decreased by .5% in POST (P < .001). After adjusting for age, gender, ISS, and trauma mechanism, being in POST was predictive of death (OR: 1.4, CI:1.3-1.5, P < .001). This was consistent across all subgroups except for geriatric subgroup, which there was no significant correlation.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nDespite advances in trauma care and almost doubling of L1TCs, POST had minimal reduction of unadjusted mortality and was an independent predictor of death. Results suggest increasing number of L1TCs alone may not improve mortality. Alternative approaches should be sought with future regional trauma system design and implementation.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":"32 10","pages":"31348241244647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241244647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND From 2013 to 2020, Arizona state trauma system expanded from seven to thirteen level 1 trauma centers (L1TCs). This study utilized the state trauma registry to analyze the effect of L1TC proliferation on patient outcomes. METHODS Adult patients age≥15 in the state trauma registry from 2007-2020 were queried for demographic, injury, and outcome variables. These variables were compared across the 2 time periods: 2007-2012 as pre-proliferation (PRE) and 2013-2020 as post-proliferation (POST). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess independent predictors of mortality. Subgroup analyses were done for Injury Severity Score (ISS)≥15, age≥65, and trauma mechanisms. RESULTS A total of 482,896 trauma patients were included in this study. 40% were female, 29% were geriatric patients, and 8.6% sustained penetrating trauma. The median ISS was 4. Inpatient mortality overall was 2.7%. POST consisted of more female, geriatric, and blunt trauma patients (P < .001). Both periods had similar median ISS. POST had more interfacility transfers (14.5% vs 10.3%, P < .001). Inpatient, unadjusted mortality decreased by .5% in POST (P < .001). After adjusting for age, gender, ISS, and trauma mechanism, being in POST was predictive of death (OR: 1.4, CI:1.3-1.5, P < .001). This was consistent across all subgroups except for geriatric subgroup, which there was no significant correlation. DISCUSSION Despite advances in trauma care and almost doubling of L1TCs, POST had minimal reduction of unadjusted mortality and was an independent predictor of death. Results suggest increasing number of L1TCs alone may not improve mortality. Alternative approaches should be sought with future regional trauma system design and implementation.
一级创伤中心扩散可能会恶化患者的预后。
背景从 2013 年到 2020 年,亚利桑那州的创伤系统从 7 个一级创伤中心(L1TC)扩展到 13 个。本研究利用州创伤登记处来分析 L1TC 扩散对患者预后的影响。方法对 2007-2020 年期间州创伤登记处中年龄≥15 岁的成人患者进行人口统计学、损伤和预后变量查询。这些变量在两个时间段内进行了比较:2007-2012 年为增殖前 (PRE),2013-2020 年为增殖后 (POST)。进行了多变量逻辑回归以评估死亡率的独立预测因素。对受伤严重程度评分(ISS)≥15 分、年龄≥65 岁和创伤机制进行了分组分析。40%为女性,29%为老年患者,8.6%为穿透性创伤。ISS中位数为4,住院患者死亡率为2.7%。POST 阶段的女性、老年和钝性创伤患者较多(P < .001)。两个时期的ISS中位数相似。POST阶段的院内转院率更高(14.5% vs 10.3%,P < .001)。未经调整的住院患者死亡率在POST阶段下降了0.5%(P < .001)。在对年龄、性别、ISS 和创伤机制进行调整后,POST 可预测死亡(OR:1.4,CI:1.3-1.5,P < .001)。尽管创伤救治技术不断进步,L1TC 的数量几乎翻了一番,但 POST 对未调整死亡率的降低作用微乎其微,而且是死亡的独立预测因素。结果表明,仅靠增加 L1TCs 的数量可能无法改善死亡率。未来在设计和实施地区创伤系统时应寻求其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信