(K)ILO project: proficiency tests for students

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Kees van Putten, Esther Peters-Grutters, Martijn Heuven
{"title":"(K)ILO project: proficiency tests for students","authors":"Kees van Putten,&nbsp;Esther Peters-Grutters,&nbsp;Martijn Heuven","doi":"10.1007/s00769-024-01581-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The (K)ILO school project (Quality in Laboratory Education) is a yearly collection of proficiency tests (PT). Students in the (K)ILO project are required to devise their own measurement plan, covering all aspects of sample preparation and analysis and to report and defend their results before an external jury. This paper reports on the 2023 year’s project where mass fractions (g/kg levels) of copper, iron, magnesium and zinc in a feed premix material (BPT-MIN2022-KILO) were determined by the participants. The students’ PT results clearly show a big difference in overall performance, <i>z</i> scores and number of outliers, when the statistical approach depends on the assigned value (AV), derived from formulation or from consensus) and the standard deviation for proficiency testing (<i>σ</i><sub>pt</sub>) fixed or derived from algorithm A. As an example, the overall performance of the four parameters with the consensus method that was assessed as satisfactory is between the range 72 to 100 % and that satisfactory performance was only 27 to 36 % when benchmarked against predetermined AVs indicating that there are underlying analytical measurement issues (most probable arising from the trace metal from sample extraction step and no information about the minimal sample intake). Of course, the students’ results and their deviations and dissemination must be seen in perspective compared to commercial laboratories with all their experience. The (K)ILO project is a valuable instrument of knowledge for future laboratory staff for understanding laboratory activities and their impact on PT results. Perhaps an international (K)ILO project could create more awareness among (future) laboratory staff of the importance of PT and quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"29 5-6","pages":"369 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01581-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The (K)ILO school project (Quality in Laboratory Education) is a yearly collection of proficiency tests (PT). Students in the (K)ILO project are required to devise their own measurement plan, covering all aspects of sample preparation and analysis and to report and defend their results before an external jury. This paper reports on the 2023 year’s project where mass fractions (g/kg levels) of copper, iron, magnesium and zinc in a feed premix material (BPT-MIN2022-KILO) were determined by the participants. The students’ PT results clearly show a big difference in overall performance, z scores and number of outliers, when the statistical approach depends on the assigned value (AV), derived from formulation or from consensus) and the standard deviation for proficiency testing (σpt) fixed or derived from algorithm A. As an example, the overall performance of the four parameters with the consensus method that was assessed as satisfactory is between the range 72 to 100 % and that satisfactory performance was only 27 to 36 % when benchmarked against predetermined AVs indicating that there are underlying analytical measurement issues (most probable arising from the trace metal from sample extraction step and no information about the minimal sample intake). Of course, the students’ results and their deviations and dissemination must be seen in perspective compared to commercial laboratories with all their experience. The (K)ILO project is a valuable instrument of knowledge for future laboratory staff for understanding laboratory activities and their impact on PT results. Perhaps an international (K)ILO project could create more awareness among (future) laboratory staff of the importance of PT and quality.

(K)国际劳工组织项目:学生能力测试
国际劳工组织(K)学校项目(实验室教育质量)是每年收集能力测试(PT)。国际劳工组织(K)项目要求学生设计自己的测量计划,涵盖样品制备和分析的所有方面,并在外部陪审团面前报告和捍卫他们的结果。本文报告了2023年的项目,其中铜、铁、镁和锌在饲料预混料(BPT-MIN2022-KILO)中的质量分数(g/kg水平)由参与者确定。当统计方法依赖于分配值(AV)(来自公式或共识)和熟练程度测试的标准差(σpt)固定或来自算法a时,学生的PT结果清楚地显示出总体表现,z分数和异常值数量的巨大差异。采用共识方法评估的四个参数的总体性能在72%到100%之间,当与预定的av进行基准测试时,令人满意的性能仅为27%到36%,这表明存在潜在的分析测量问题(最可能是由于样品提取步骤中的痕量金属引起的,并且没有关于最小样品摄入量的信息)。当然,学生的结果及其偏差和传播必须与具有所有经验的商业实验室进行比较。(K)劳工组织项目是未来实验室工作人员了解实验室活动及其对PT结果影响的宝贵知识工具。也许国际劳工组织的一个国际项目可以使(未来的)实验室工作人员更加认识到PT和质量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信