Wisdom of the Masses? Users and Educators Contrasting Perspectives on the Data Privacy and Safety of Early Years’ Apps

J. Raffaghelli, Emilia Restiglian, Paola Zoroaster, Maria Valentini
{"title":"Wisdom of the Masses? Users and Educators Contrasting Perspectives on the Data Privacy and Safety of Early Years’ Apps","authors":"J. Raffaghelli, Emilia Restiglian, Paola Zoroaster, Maria Valentini","doi":"10.15366/reice2024.22.2.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key focus is assessing children's apps, emphasising informational clarity, safety, and data ethics. The present study employs a structured database for app evaluation, by categorising 30 apps into edutainment, education, instruction, and training based on various criteria, including educational value and user ratings. Moreover, a comparative evaluation between the public ratings and the educator's evaluation was carried out. The findings underscore the challenges in app evaluation due to the proliferation of unregulated and untested applications. It highlights the discrepancies between public app evaluations and those conducted by experienced educators, pointing out the difficulties in obtaining relevant information for accurate app assessment. The study also addresses the aesthetic appeal of apps and how they influence parental choices, often overshadowing concerns about user security and privacy. In conclusion, the study calls for heightened parental awareness in selecting apps for their children. It stresses the importance of considering learning value, educational value, information clarity, security, and ethical data use.","PeriodicalId":509779,"journal":{"name":"REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación","volume":"50 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2024.22.2.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key focus is assessing children's apps, emphasising informational clarity, safety, and data ethics. The present study employs a structured database for app evaluation, by categorising 30 apps into edutainment, education, instruction, and training based on various criteria, including educational value and user ratings. Moreover, a comparative evaluation between the public ratings and the educator's evaluation was carried out. The findings underscore the challenges in app evaluation due to the proliferation of unregulated and untested applications. It highlights the discrepancies between public app evaluations and those conducted by experienced educators, pointing out the difficulties in obtaining relevant information for accurate app assessment. The study also addresses the aesthetic appeal of apps and how they influence parental choices, often overshadowing concerns about user security and privacy. In conclusion, the study calls for heightened parental awareness in selecting apps for their children. It stresses the importance of considering learning value, educational value, information clarity, security, and ethical data use.
大众的智慧?用户和教育工作者对幼儿应用程序数据隐私和安全的不同看法
评估儿童应用程序的重点是信息清晰度、安全性和数据道德。本研究采用结构化数据库对应用程序进行评估,根据教育价值和用户评分等不同标准,将 30 款应用程序分为寓教于乐、教育、指导和培训类。此外,还对公众评分和教育工作者的评价进行了比较评估。研究结果强调了由于不受监管和未经测试的应用程序激增而给应用程序评估带来的挑战。它强调了公众应用程序评价与经验丰富的教育工作者所做评价之间的差异,指出了为准确评估应用程序而获取相关信息的困难。研究还探讨了应用程序的美学吸引力以及它们如何影响家长的选择,这往往会掩盖对用户安全和隐私的担忧。总之,研究呼吁家长在为孩子选择应用程序时提高警惕。它强调了考虑学习价值、教育价值、信息清晰度、安全性和数据使用道德的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信