Organizational structure, capacity and reach of organizations involved in alcohol prevention: An assessment of stakeholders across five countries in East Africa

IF 1 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Gina Raderalazasoa, Monica H. Swahn, Adelaide Balenger, David Kalema, Crescence Mukantabana, S. Komba, Aloysius Rukundo, P. Okwarah
{"title":"Organizational structure, capacity and reach of organizations involved in alcohol prevention: An assessment of stakeholders across five countries in East Africa","authors":"Gina Raderalazasoa, Monica H. Swahn, Adelaide Balenger, David Kalema, Crescence Mukantabana, S. Komba, Aloysius Rukundo, P. Okwarah","doi":"10.7895/ijadr.453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: East African countries, classified as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), are disproportionately harmed by alcohol consumption, and many countries lack strategies to address and prevent alcohol harm. This study draws on community input from stakeholders involved in alcohol harm prevention in five East African countries to identify organizational structures, capacity and outreach, and strategies for capacity building to address the high burden of alcohol harm more systematically. \nDesign/Setting/Participants: A cross-sectional survey was distributed in 2020 by the East Africa Alcohol Policy Alliance to their member alliances and stakeholders across five countries in East Africa (i.e., Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda). Analyses were computed based on 171 persons/organizations completing the survey.  \nMeasures: The East Africa Alcohol Policy Alliance Capacity Assessment Survey (EAAPACAS) included organizational size and funding, research capacity, priorities, and perceptions related to alcohol prevention and harm locally and nationally. \nResults: The types of organizations, funding structures, and functions dedicated to alcohol prevention vary widely across countries, indicating great diversity and heterogeneity of organizations working on alcohol prevention and advocacy in East Africa. Most organizations relied on volunteer staff. Additionally, 51% reported that they did not know or did not meet their program needs with the available operational funds. \nConclusion: These organizations rely primarily on volunteers and face significant barriers in order to achieve their goals with their current budget, primarily derived from foundations and private donations. Overall, these findings indicate that the infrastructure for alcohol prevention is weak and fragmented in countries where national initiatives are limited or underfunded.","PeriodicalId":73420,"journal":{"name":"International journal of alcohol and drug research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of alcohol and drug research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: East African countries, classified as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), are disproportionately harmed by alcohol consumption, and many countries lack strategies to address and prevent alcohol harm. This study draws on community input from stakeholders involved in alcohol harm prevention in five East African countries to identify organizational structures, capacity and outreach, and strategies for capacity building to address the high burden of alcohol harm more systematically. Design/Setting/Participants: A cross-sectional survey was distributed in 2020 by the East Africa Alcohol Policy Alliance to their member alliances and stakeholders across five countries in East Africa (i.e., Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda). Analyses were computed based on 171 persons/organizations completing the survey.  Measures: The East Africa Alcohol Policy Alliance Capacity Assessment Survey (EAAPACAS) included organizational size and funding, research capacity, priorities, and perceptions related to alcohol prevention and harm locally and nationally. Results: The types of organizations, funding structures, and functions dedicated to alcohol prevention vary widely across countries, indicating great diversity and heterogeneity of organizations working on alcohol prevention and advocacy in East Africa. Most organizations relied on volunteer staff. Additionally, 51% reported that they did not know or did not meet their program needs with the available operational funds. Conclusion: These organizations rely primarily on volunteers and face significant barriers in order to achieve their goals with their current budget, primarily derived from foundations and private donations. Overall, these findings indicate that the infrastructure for alcohol prevention is weak and fragmented in countries where national initiatives are limited or underfunded.
参与酒精预防的组织结构、能力和覆盖范围:对东非五国利益攸关方的评估
目的:被列为中低收入国家(LMIC)的东非国家因饮酒而受到的伤害格外严重,许多国家缺乏应对和预防酒精伤害的战略。本研究借鉴了东非五国参与酒精伤害预防的利益相关者的社区意见,以确定组织结构、能力和外联以及能力建设战略,从而更系统地应对酒精伤害造成的沉重负担。设计/地点/参与者:东非酒精政策联盟于 2020 年向东非五国(即布隆迪、肯尼亚、卢旺达、坦桑尼亚和乌干达)的成员联盟和利益相关者发放了一份横向调查问卷。根据完成调查的 171 人/组织进行了分析计算。 措施:东非酒精政策联盟能力评估调查(EAAPACAS)包括组织规模和资金、研究能力、优先事项以及对当地和全国酒精预防和危害的看法。结果:各国专门从事酒精预防工作的组织类型、资金结构和职能大相径庭,这表明东非从事酒精预防和宣传工作的组织具有极大的多样性和异质性。大多数组织依靠志愿工作人员。此外,51%的组织表示,他们不知道或无法用现有的运营资金满足其计划需求。结论:这些组织主要依靠志愿者,在现有预算(主要来自基金会和私人捐款)的情况下,要实现其目标面临巨大障碍。总之,这些调查结果表明,在国家举措有限或资金不足的国家,酒精预防基础设施薄弱且分散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信