Prediction of Favorability of Maxillary 
Canine Impaction Using Artificial 
Intelligence Algorithm

D. M., Bhadrinath S., Balika. J. Chelliah, Umamageshwari A., Deepa S.
{"title":"Prediction of Favorability of Maxillary \u2028Canine Impaction Using Artificial \u2028Intelligence Algorithm","authors":"D. M., Bhadrinath S., Balika. J. Chelliah, Umamageshwari A., Deepa S.","doi":"10.1177/03015742241240607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To test the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm in predicting the favorability of maxillary canine impaction as compared to the conventional manual tracing method using orthopantomograms. Materials and methods: Orthopantomograms of 437 canine impactions were included in this study. Six parameters (sector classification, three angular, and two linear) on orthopantomograms were used to assess the severity of the maxillary canine impaction. The most advanced convolutional neural network model implemented using MATLAB program was used in assessing the favorability of maxillary canine impaction. The outcome of the parameters assessed by the implemented AI model and conventional manual tracing were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were used to assess the performance of AI model in comparison to manual tracing for the angular and sector parameters. Paired t-tests were used for linear measurements. Results: The overall clinical performance exceeded 90% for all the angular parameters including sector classification except for the angle between long axis of canine with lateral incisor which had a specificity score of 55%. The value and the area under the ROC curve were more than 0.9 for all the parameters. The distance from the canine cusp tip to the occlusal plane and midline was statistically significant between the groups ( p = .000). Conclusion: The proposed AI algorithm had higher accuracy in predicting the favorability of eruption in maxillary canine impactions compared to conventional manual tracing.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":"54 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742241240607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To test the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm in predicting the favorability of maxillary canine impaction as compared to the conventional manual tracing method using orthopantomograms. Materials and methods: Orthopantomograms of 437 canine impactions were included in this study. Six parameters (sector classification, three angular, and two linear) on orthopantomograms were used to assess the severity of the maxillary canine impaction. The most advanced convolutional neural network model implemented using MATLAB program was used in assessing the favorability of maxillary canine impaction. The outcome of the parameters assessed by the implemented AI model and conventional manual tracing were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were used to assess the performance of AI model in comparison to manual tracing for the angular and sector parameters. Paired t-tests were used for linear measurements. Results: The overall clinical performance exceeded 90% for all the angular parameters including sector classification except for the angle between long axis of canine with lateral incisor which had a specificity score of 55%. The value and the area under the ROC curve were more than 0.9 for all the parameters. The distance from the canine cusp tip to the occlusal plane and midline was statistically significant between the groups ( p = .000). Conclusion: The proposed AI algorithm had higher accuracy in predicting the favorability of eruption in maxillary canine impactions compared to conventional manual tracing.
利用人工智能算法预测上颌犬齿嵌塞的有利程度
目的测试人工智能(AI)算法在预测上颌犬牙嵌塞可能性方面的准确性,并与使用正侧位图的传统手动描记法进行比较。材料和方法:本研究纳入了 437 个犬齿撞击的正位像。正位像上的六个参数(扇形分类、三个角度和两个线性)用于评估上颌犬齿撞击的严重程度。使用 MATLAB 程序实现的最先进的卷积神经网络模型用于评估上颌犬齿嵌塞的有利程度。比较了人工智能模型和传统人工追踪所评估参数的结果。使用受体操作特征曲线(ROC)、诊断准确性、灵敏度、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值来评估人工智能模型与人工追踪在角度和扇形参数方面的性能比较。线性测量采用配对 t 检验。结果显示除了犬齿长轴与侧切牙之间的夹角特异性为 55% 之外,包括扇形分类在内的所有角度参数的总体临床表现均超过 90%。所有参数的 ROC 曲线值和曲线下面积均大于 0.9。各组间犬尖到咬合平面和中线的距离具有统计学意义(P = .000)。结论:与传统的手动描记相比,所提出的人工智能算法在预测上颌犬齿撞击的萌出有利度方面具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信