Bio-Risk Management Systems: Biosafety Assessment in COVID-19 Referral Hospitals in Indonesia

Safety Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.3390/safety10020036
Windri Handayani, A. Bowolaksono, Fatma Lestari, A. Kadir, S. A. Satyawardhani, Duta Liana, A. Z. Ananda, Saravanan Gunaratnam
{"title":"Bio-Risk Management Systems: Biosafety Assessment in COVID-19 Referral Hospitals in Indonesia","authors":"Windri Handayani, A. Bowolaksono, Fatma Lestari, A. Kadir, S. A. Satyawardhani, Duta Liana, A. Z. Ananda, Saravanan Gunaratnam","doi":"10.3390/safety10020036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous hospital laboratories in Indonesia need to implement improved bio-risk management (BRM) systems. There are many potential biohazards in laboratory activities that can impact health and the environment, leading to laboratory incidents. To minimize the impact and occurrence of such incidents, it is necessary to evaluate the implementation of BRM in every hospital laboratory that uses biological agents. This study was conducted in eight COVID-19 reference hospitals in Indonesia in the regions of Sumatra, Kalimantan, and Java, which have committed to implementing BRM systems in their laboratory activities. This research employed a descriptive study design and quantitative methods, with the aim of analyzing and evaluating the implementation of BRM systems in laboratories by assessing the achievements and gap analysis obtained from each laboratory. This research utilized primary data in the form of checklist forms referencing ISO 35001:2019 for the laboratory BRM system. Then, the assessments were based on virtual interviews conducted by the researcher with laboratory personnel as the primary data. The evaluation conducted on gap analysis from the seven clauses in ISO 35001:2019 across all hospitals revealed large gaps, particularly in three clauses: leadership, support, and performance. However, the aspects concerning organization, improvement, and performance evaluation were relatively satisfactory. Hence, there is a need for further improvement in leadership, support, and performance evaluation clauses. Additionally, it is essential to highlight the importance of comprehensive performance assessment, including proactive audits and continuous enhancements to achieve optimal bio-risk management.","PeriodicalId":509460,"journal":{"name":"Safety","volume":"25 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10020036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous hospital laboratories in Indonesia need to implement improved bio-risk management (BRM) systems. There are many potential biohazards in laboratory activities that can impact health and the environment, leading to laboratory incidents. To minimize the impact and occurrence of such incidents, it is necessary to evaluate the implementation of BRM in every hospital laboratory that uses biological agents. This study was conducted in eight COVID-19 reference hospitals in Indonesia in the regions of Sumatra, Kalimantan, and Java, which have committed to implementing BRM systems in their laboratory activities. This research employed a descriptive study design and quantitative methods, with the aim of analyzing and evaluating the implementation of BRM systems in laboratories by assessing the achievements and gap analysis obtained from each laboratory. This research utilized primary data in the form of checklist forms referencing ISO 35001:2019 for the laboratory BRM system. Then, the assessments were based on virtual interviews conducted by the researcher with laboratory personnel as the primary data. The evaluation conducted on gap analysis from the seven clauses in ISO 35001:2019 across all hospitals revealed large gaps, particularly in three clauses: leadership, support, and performance. However, the aspects concerning organization, improvement, and performance evaluation were relatively satisfactory. Hence, there is a need for further improvement in leadership, support, and performance evaluation clauses. Additionally, it is essential to highlight the importance of comprehensive performance assessment, including proactive audits and continuous enhancements to achieve optimal bio-risk management.
生物风险管理系统:印度尼西亚 COVID-19 转诊医院的生物安全评估
印度尼西亚的许多医院实验室需要实施更好的生物风险管理(BRM)系统。实验室活动中有许多潜在的生物危害,可能会影响健康和环境,导致实验室事故。为了将此类事故的影响和发生率降至最低,有必要对使用生物制剂的每家医院实验室的生物风险管理实施情况进行评估。本研究在印尼苏门答腊、加里曼丹和爪哇地区的八家 COVID-19 参考医院中进行,这些医院已承诺在实验室活动中实施 BRM 系统。本研究采用描述性研究设计和定量方法,旨在通过评估各实验室取得的成就和差距分析,分析和评价实验室实施 BRM 系统的情况。本研究参考 ISO 35001:2019,以实验室 BRM 系统检查表的形式利用了原始数据。然后,研究人员与实验室人员进行了虚拟访谈,以此作为主要数据进行评估。从 ISO 35001:2019 中的七个条款对所有医院进行的差距分析评估显示,差距很大,尤其是在领导力、支持和绩效这三个条款上。但在组织、改进和绩效评估方面则相对令人满意。因此,有必要进一步改进领导力、支持和绩效评估条款。此外,必须强调全面绩效评估的重要性,包括主动审计和持续改进,以实现最佳的生 物风险管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信