Impact of English Language Proficiency on Local Language Use among Bangladeshi Graduates

IF 0.9 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Languages Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.3390/languages9040134
Md Tarikul Islam, Md. Kamrul Hasan, S. Ramalingam, Kazi Enamul Hoque
{"title":"Impact of English Language Proficiency on Local Language Use among Bangladeshi Graduates","authors":"Md Tarikul Islam, Md. Kamrul Hasan, S. Ramalingam, Kazi Enamul Hoque","doi":"10.3390/languages9040134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to identify the impact of English language proficiency on Bangladeshi graduates in terms of its influence on local languages and cultural integration. The study was conducted using a quantitative approach, and the random sampling technique was employed to select 370 respondents from English and Bengali medium-instructed Bangladeshi graduates. Data were analysed using SPSS version 27.0. The Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and multiple regression analyses were used in line with the research objectives. The Pearson correlation shows a significant correlation among the studied variables, such as cultural erosion (R2 = 047, p < 0.001), threat to local language (R2 = 048, p < 0.001), and polluting local language (R2 = 047, p < 0.001). The ANOVA test was performed to find the mean difference in cultural erosion (CE), threat to local language (TLL), and polluting local language (PLL) with respect to respondents’ qualifications (bachelor’s, master’s, or Ph.D. degree). The ANOVA result revealed no statistically significant difference in CE and TLL in terms of graduates’ qualifications, while PLL differs significantly based on their qualifications (bachelor’s, master’s, or Ph.D. degree.). Similarly, significant differences in CE, TLL, and PLL were found among the income groups and living places of graduates. Multiple regression analysis explained 13.6% variances in the social class context with ELP-linked challenges (R2 = 0.136, p = 0.001), while the lower class was found to have positive non-significant relationships with ELP-linked challenges (B = 0. 159, p = 0.382). This was almost double that of the result for the rich class (B = 0.085, p = 0.721). However, ELP-linked challenges contain a mixture of languages and cultural blending in society, as the rich class faces fewer challenges than the lower and middle classes. The study is influential in creating an awareness of language use whenever necessary.","PeriodicalId":52329,"journal":{"name":"Languages","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9040134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the impact of English language proficiency on Bangladeshi graduates in terms of its influence on local languages and cultural integration. The study was conducted using a quantitative approach, and the random sampling technique was employed to select 370 respondents from English and Bengali medium-instructed Bangladeshi graduates. Data were analysed using SPSS version 27.0. The Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and multiple regression analyses were used in line with the research objectives. The Pearson correlation shows a significant correlation among the studied variables, such as cultural erosion (R2 = 047, p < 0.001), threat to local language (R2 = 048, p < 0.001), and polluting local language (R2 = 047, p < 0.001). The ANOVA test was performed to find the mean difference in cultural erosion (CE), threat to local language (TLL), and polluting local language (PLL) with respect to respondents’ qualifications (bachelor’s, master’s, or Ph.D. degree). The ANOVA result revealed no statistically significant difference in CE and TLL in terms of graduates’ qualifications, while PLL differs significantly based on their qualifications (bachelor’s, master’s, or Ph.D. degree.). Similarly, significant differences in CE, TLL, and PLL were found among the income groups and living places of graduates. Multiple regression analysis explained 13.6% variances in the social class context with ELP-linked challenges (R2 = 0.136, p = 0.001), while the lower class was found to have positive non-significant relationships with ELP-linked challenges (B = 0. 159, p = 0.382). This was almost double that of the result for the rich class (B = 0.085, p = 0.721). However, ELP-linked challenges contain a mixture of languages and cultural blending in society, as the rich class faces fewer challenges than the lower and middle classes. The study is influential in creating an awareness of language use whenever necessary.
英语水平对孟加拉国毕业生使用当地语言的影响
本研究旨在确定英语语言能力对孟加拉国毕业生当地语言和文化融合的影响。研究采用定量方法,随机抽样技术从英语和孟加拉语授课的孟加拉国毕业生中抽取了 370 名受访者,使用 SPSS 27.0 版对数据进行分析。数据采用 SPSS 27.0 版进行分析,并根据研究目标使用了皮尔逊相关分析、方差分析和多元回归分析。皮尔逊相关分析表明,文化侵蚀(R2 = 047,p < 0.001)、对本地语言的威胁(R2 = 048,p < 0.001)和污染本地语言(R2 = 047,p < 0.001)等研究变量之间存在显著相关性。方差分析检验了文化侵蚀(CE)、威胁本地语言(TLL)和污染本地语言(PLL)在受访者学历(学士、硕士或博士)方面的平均差异。方差分析结果表明,CE 和 TLL 在毕业生学历方面没有显著差异,而 PLL 则因学历(学士、硕士或博士)不同而有显著差异。同样,在毕业生的收入群体和居住地之间,CE、TLL 和 PLL 也存在明显差异。多元回归分析解释了13.6%的社会阶层与电子学习课程相关挑战的差异(R2 = 0.136,p = 0.001),而低阶层与电子学习课程相关挑战的关系为正非显著关系(B = 0. 159,p = 0.382)。这几乎是富裕阶层结果的两倍(B = 0.085,p = 0.721)。然而,与英语语言学习能力相关的挑战包含社会中的语言和文化交融,因为富裕阶层面临的挑战少于中下层阶级。这项研究对于在必要时树立语言使用意识具有影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Languages
Languages Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信