Robotic misinformation in dementia care: emotions as sense-making resources in residents’ encounters with robot animals

Marcus Persson, Elin Thunman, Clara Iversen, David Redmalm
{"title":"Robotic misinformation in dementia care: emotions as sense-making resources in residents’ encounters with robot animals","authors":"Marcus Persson, Elin Thunman, Clara Iversen, David Redmalm","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1354978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robot animals, designed to mimic living beings, pose ethical challenges in the context of caring for vulnerable patients, specifically concerning deception. This paper explores how emotions become a resource for dealing with the misinformative nature of robot animals in dementia care homes. Based on observations of encounters between residents, care workers, and robot animals, the study shows how persons with dementia approach the ambiguous robots as either living beings, material artifacts, or something in-between. Grounded in interactionist theory, the research demonstrates that emotions serve as tools in the sense-making process, occurring through interactions with the material object and in collaboration with care workers. The appreciation of social robots does not solely hinge on them being perceived as real or fake animals; persons with dementia may find amusement in “fake” animals and express fear of “real” ones. This observation leads us to argue that there is a gap between guidelines addressing misinformation and robots and the specific context in which the technology is in use. In situations where small talk and play are essential activities, care workers often prioritize responsiveness to residents rather than making sure that the robot’s nature is transparent. In these situations, residents’ emotional expressions serve not only as crucial resources for their own sense-making but also as valuable indicators for care workers to comprehend how to navigate care situations.","PeriodicalId":507974,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1354978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robot animals, designed to mimic living beings, pose ethical challenges in the context of caring for vulnerable patients, specifically concerning deception. This paper explores how emotions become a resource for dealing with the misinformative nature of robot animals in dementia care homes. Based on observations of encounters between residents, care workers, and robot animals, the study shows how persons with dementia approach the ambiguous robots as either living beings, material artifacts, or something in-between. Grounded in interactionist theory, the research demonstrates that emotions serve as tools in the sense-making process, occurring through interactions with the material object and in collaboration with care workers. The appreciation of social robots does not solely hinge on them being perceived as real or fake animals; persons with dementia may find amusement in “fake” animals and express fear of “real” ones. This observation leads us to argue that there is a gap between guidelines addressing misinformation and robots and the specific context in which the technology is in use. In situations where small talk and play are essential activities, care workers often prioritize responsiveness to residents rather than making sure that the robot’s nature is transparent. In these situations, residents’ emotional expressions serve not only as crucial resources for their own sense-making but also as valuable indicators for care workers to comprehend how to navigate care situations.
痴呆症护理中的机器人误导:情感是居民与机器动物接触时的感知资源
模仿活人设计的机器动物在照顾易受伤害的病人方面带来了伦理挑战,特别是在欺骗方面。本文探讨了在老年痴呆症护理院中,情感如何成为应对机器动物误导的一种资源。根据对居民、护理人员和机器动物之间接触的观察,研究显示了痴呆症患者是如何把模棱两可的机器人当作活人、物质人工制品或介于两者之间的东西来对待的。研究以互动论为基础,表明情感是感知过程中的工具,通过与物质对象的互动以及与护理人员的合作而产生。对社交机器人的欣赏并不完全取决于它们是真动物还是假动物;痴呆症患者可能会在 "假 "动物身上找到乐趣,而对 "真 "动物表示恐惧。这一观察结果使我们认为,针对错误信息和机器人的指导方针与技术使用的具体环境之间存在差距。在以闲聊和玩耍为基本活动的情况下,护理人员通常会优先考虑对居民做出回应,而不是确保机器人的本质是透明的。在这种情况下,住户的情绪表达不仅是他们自我感知的重要资源,也是护理人员理解如何驾驭护理环境的宝贵指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信