Empirical validation of marginalisation thesis on the participation in the informal economy in Goa

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
G. K. Manerkar, BP Sarath Chandran
{"title":"Empirical validation of marginalisation thesis on the participation in the informal economy in Goa","authors":"G. K. Manerkar, BP Sarath Chandran","doi":"10.55493/5002.v14i5.5040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the global increase in informal labor, focusing on two primary theoretical perspectives: the marginalization thesis and the reinforcement thesis. Previous empirical studies across various contexts have not definitively settled this debate. The current study, conducted in Goa, India, offers distinctive insights. Data from 200 informally employed individuals in both the formal and informal sectors was collected using snowball sampling. The findings of the binary logistic regression model reveal that the marginalisation thesis holds true, as individuals who are marginalised in terms of gender, age, education, and household employment in the informal sector are more likely to engage in informal employment. Conversely, the reinforcement thesis is supported when workplace characteristics such as flexible work timing and employment in construction services are considered. Therefore, the study concludes that a combination of marginalisation and reinforcement factors explains the reasons behind participation in the informal economy. Therefore, analysing labour market dynamics can offer valuable insights into informal employment.","PeriodicalId":53424,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic and Financial Review","volume":"279 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic and Financial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v14i5.5040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the global increase in informal labor, focusing on two primary theoretical perspectives: the marginalization thesis and the reinforcement thesis. Previous empirical studies across various contexts have not definitively settled this debate. The current study, conducted in Goa, India, offers distinctive insights. Data from 200 informally employed individuals in both the formal and informal sectors was collected using snowball sampling. The findings of the binary logistic regression model reveal that the marginalisation thesis holds true, as individuals who are marginalised in terms of gender, age, education, and household employment in the informal sector are more likely to engage in informal employment. Conversely, the reinforcement thesis is supported when workplace characteristics such as flexible work timing and employment in construction services are considered. Therefore, the study concludes that a combination of marginalisation and reinforcement factors explains the reasons behind participation in the informal economy. Therefore, analysing labour market dynamics can offer valuable insights into informal employment.
果阿参与非正规经济的边缘化理论的经验验证
本文研究了全球非正规劳动力增加的问题,重点关注两种主要的理论观点:边缘化论和强化论。以往不同背景下的实证研究并未明确解决这一争论。本研究在印度果阿进行,提供了与众不同的见解。研究采用滚雪球式抽样,从正规和非正规部门的 200 名非正规就业者中收集了数据。二元逻辑回归模型的结果表明,边缘化理论成立,因为在性别、年龄、教育程度和非正规部门家庭就业方面被边缘化的个人更有可能从事非正规就业。相反,如果考虑到灵活的工作时间和在建筑服务业就业等工作场所特征,强化论则得到了支持。因此,研究得出结论,边缘化和强化因素的结合解释了参与非正规经济的原因。因此,对劳动力市场动态的分析可以为了解非正规就业提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Economic and Financial Review
Asian Economic and Financial Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信