Delineating Peasant-like and Community-based Entrepreneurial Modes of Rural Tourism: A Case Study of Takachihogo–Shiibayama, Japan

Kako Inoue, Atsushi Iihoshi
{"title":"Delineating Peasant-like and Community-based Entrepreneurial Modes of Rural Tourism: A Case Study of Takachihogo–Shiibayama, Japan","authors":"Kako Inoue, Atsushi Iihoshi","doi":"10.56669/rrbh2521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we aim to capture and unravel the complexity of rural tourism that has evolved in rural Japan since green tourism was introduced in the 1990s, with a close examination of the case of the Takachihogo– Shiibayama area. Small-scale farmers and rice farming communities have traditionally been important features of Japanese farming villages, as in other Asian countries. In this paper, we focus on how these small farmers and communities can demonstrate their autonomy in rural tourism. After reviewing the overall rural tourism situation in Japan from literature and policy documents, we illustrate that three forms of rural tourism coexist, namely, mass tourism, peasant-like, and community-based entrepreneurial rural tourism with a comparative study approach, selecting embedded cases of the study area, where we had a series of interviews and observations regularly and continuously since 2015. The critical difference among them lies in the different ways in which they mobilize social and material resources, the basis of autonomy, and the arrangement of tasks and operations. In contrast to mass tourism, peasant-like rural tourism is operated by family labor, using their accessible resources, and individual families are the ones who exhibit autonomy, whereas community-based entrepreneurial rural tourism is run by the village as a whole, connected to all local resources and human resources of the entire village, and each villager has different roles and responsibilities, with their capacities and skills always being polished through training opportunities. In the context of the general trend of depopulation in rural areas of Japan with weakening functions of rural communities, this research demonstrates that (1) attempts by various individual small households in peasant-like rural tourism are loosely connected with intermediary support organizations in a broad area and (2) the community-based entrepreneurial rural tourism business is managed and operated by a small village as a whole. This study indicates the value of learning how to enhance the distinctive and unique assets of the rural community. The crucial aspect lies in devising strategic initiatives that effectively embrace and deepen unique rural characteristics, establishing an environment that fosters continuous learning for each individual and strengthens the rural community as a whole.","PeriodicalId":137922,"journal":{"name":"FFTC Journal of Agricultural Policy","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FFTC Journal of Agricultural Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56669/rrbh2521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to capture and unravel the complexity of rural tourism that has evolved in rural Japan since green tourism was introduced in the 1990s, with a close examination of the case of the Takachihogo– Shiibayama area. Small-scale farmers and rice farming communities have traditionally been important features of Japanese farming villages, as in other Asian countries. In this paper, we focus on how these small farmers and communities can demonstrate their autonomy in rural tourism. After reviewing the overall rural tourism situation in Japan from literature and policy documents, we illustrate that three forms of rural tourism coexist, namely, mass tourism, peasant-like, and community-based entrepreneurial rural tourism with a comparative study approach, selecting embedded cases of the study area, where we had a series of interviews and observations regularly and continuously since 2015. The critical difference among them lies in the different ways in which they mobilize social and material resources, the basis of autonomy, and the arrangement of tasks and operations. In contrast to mass tourism, peasant-like rural tourism is operated by family labor, using their accessible resources, and individual families are the ones who exhibit autonomy, whereas community-based entrepreneurial rural tourism is run by the village as a whole, connected to all local resources and human resources of the entire village, and each villager has different roles and responsibilities, with their capacities and skills always being polished through training opportunities. In the context of the general trend of depopulation in rural areas of Japan with weakening functions of rural communities, this research demonstrates that (1) attempts by various individual small households in peasant-like rural tourism are loosely connected with intermediary support organizations in a broad area and (2) the community-based entrepreneurial rural tourism business is managed and operated by a small village as a whole. This study indicates the value of learning how to enhance the distinctive and unique assets of the rural community. The crucial aspect lies in devising strategic initiatives that effectively embrace and deepen unique rural characteristics, establishing an environment that fosters continuous learning for each individual and strengthens the rural community as a whole.
划分乡村旅游的农民式和社区式创业模式:日本高千穗芝山案例研究
在本文中,我们旨在通过对高千穗椎山地区案例的仔细研究,捕捉并揭示自 20 世纪 90 年代引入绿色旅游以来日本农村地区乡村旅游发展的复杂性。与其他亚洲国家一样,小规模农户和水稻种植社区历来是日本农业村庄的重要特征。在本文中,我们将重点关注这些小农户和社区如何在乡村旅游中展现其自主性。在从文献和政策文件中回顾了日本乡村旅游的整体情况后,我们采用比较研究的方法,选取了研究地区的嵌入式案例,从 2015 年起定期、持续地对研究地区进行了一系列访谈和观察,说明了三种乡村旅游形式并存,即大众旅游、农民式乡村旅游和社区创业式乡村旅游。它们之间的关键区别在于调动社会和物质资源的方式、自治基础以及任务和业务安排的不同。与大众旅游相比,农家式乡村旅游是以家庭劳动力为单位,利用家庭可获得的资源进行经营,单个家庭是自主性的体现;而社区创业式乡村旅游则是以村为单位,连接当地所有资源和全村的人力资源,每个村民都有不同的角色和责任,他们的能力和技能总是在培训机会中得到打磨。在日本农村地区人口减少、农村社区功能弱化的大趋势下,本研究表明:(1) 各个小家庭在农民式乡村旅游方面的尝试与广大地区的中介支持组织有着松散的联系;(2) 以社区为基础的创业型乡村旅游业务是由小村庄作为一个整体来管理和运营的。这项研究表明,学习如何提升农村社区的特色和独特资产具有重要价值。关键在于制定战略举措,有效包容和深化独特的乡村特色,建立一个促进每个人不断学习的环境,并加强乡村社区的整体实力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信