The theory of the regional security complex — Case study, the riparian states of the Black Sea

Adrian Ghenade, Elena Onu
{"title":"The theory of the regional security complex — Case study, the riparian states of the Black Sea","authors":"Adrian Ghenade, Elena Onu","doi":"10.53477/2284-9378-24-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Known in Antiquity as the Pontus Euxinus, the Black Sea has been the bridge between European and Eastern civilizations since ancient times. Possessing a multi-varied mosaic of cultures, the Black Sea area has facilitated over the centuries, both the development of commercial and political relations and the maintenance and production of conflicts, being like the Sword of Damocles. Located at the intersection of three security zones (Euro-Atlantic, Russian, and Eastern), the Black Sea is currently a vulnerable space in terms of security. Heir to Byzantine culture, most of the riparian states have a complicated internal and external policy, being caught between the idealism of the Western world and the realism of the Eastern European space. At the same time, the revisionism of the Russian Federation and Turkey in terms of foreign policy will also mean a change in the dynamics of the relations between the states bordering the Black Sea, which could result either in its return to the status of a Russian lake or in a division of the spheres of influence between the Russian Federation and Turkey. In this sense, in order to analyze the future security dynamics of the riparian states, we used the theory of the regional security complex, which we consider very appropriate in our study of the Black Sea region.","PeriodicalId":516822,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF \"CAROL I\" NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF \"CAROL I\" NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-24-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Known in Antiquity as the Pontus Euxinus, the Black Sea has been the bridge between European and Eastern civilizations since ancient times. Possessing a multi-varied mosaic of cultures, the Black Sea area has facilitated over the centuries, both the development of commercial and political relations and the maintenance and production of conflicts, being like the Sword of Damocles. Located at the intersection of three security zones (Euro-Atlantic, Russian, and Eastern), the Black Sea is currently a vulnerable space in terms of security. Heir to Byzantine culture, most of the riparian states have a complicated internal and external policy, being caught between the idealism of the Western world and the realism of the Eastern European space. At the same time, the revisionism of the Russian Federation and Turkey in terms of foreign policy will also mean a change in the dynamics of the relations between the states bordering the Black Sea, which could result either in its return to the status of a Russian lake or in a division of the spheres of influence between the Russian Federation and Turkey. In this sense, in order to analyze the future security dynamics of the riparian states, we used the theory of the regional security complex, which we consider very appropriate in our study of the Black Sea region.
地区安全综合体理论--黑海沿岸国家案例研究
黑海在古代被称为 "欧希努斯之邦"(Pontus Euxinus),自古以来就是连接欧洲和东方文明的桥梁。几个世纪以来,黑海地区既促进了商业和政治关系的发展,也维持和制造了冲突,就像一把达摩克利斯之剑。黑海位于三个安全区(欧洲-大西洋、俄罗斯和东方)的交汇处,目前在安全方面是一个脆弱的空间。作为拜占庭文化的继承者,大多数沿岸国的内外政策错综复杂,夹在西方世界的理想主义和东欧空间的现实主义之间。同时,俄罗斯联邦和土耳其在外交政策上的修正主义也意味着黑海沿岸国家之间关系的动态变化,这可能导致黑海重新成为俄罗斯的一个湖泊,也可能导致俄罗斯联邦和土耳其之间势力范围的划分。从这个意义上说,为了分析沿岸国未来的安全动态,我们使用了地区安全综合体理论,我们认为该理论非常适合我们对黑海地区的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信