Showcasing Sustainability Within Dietetics Education – Opportunities and Challenges

Fiona McCullough
{"title":"Showcasing Sustainability Within Dietetics Education – Opportunities and Challenges","authors":"Fiona McCullough","doi":"10.1159/000538299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low professional confidence and perceived competence create tangible barriers to integrating sustainable food systems (SFS) and diets into dietetic practice. One opportunity to facilitate more systemic integration into dietetic education and training is to include these concepts in professional standards. To better understand the barrier of low professional confidence and perceived competence for engagement with SFS-related practice, the purpose of this research was to investigate dietetic training standards for SFS content and to highlight opportunities for growth within the profession. Questions posed by this research are: (1) how, if at all, are SFS and diets articulated in dietetic training standards, and (2) to what level of cognitive complexity? Methods: A content analysis of dietetic training standards documents was conducted between 15 April and 15 September 2021. Search terms included 'sustain*' or 'sustainable', 'food systems' and/or 'diets'. Extracted data with applicable SFS content were analysed for level of cognitive complexity requirements. Results: Of 47 National Dietetics Associations, researchers obtained 23 dietetic training standards documents, of which 16 included SFS-related content. The majority of documents used broad descriptors of the concepts, with little granularity and at a lower level of cognitive complexity.","PeriodicalId":355068,"journal":{"name":"Kompass Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kompass Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low professional confidence and perceived competence create tangible barriers to integrating sustainable food systems (SFS) and diets into dietetic practice. One opportunity to facilitate more systemic integration into dietetic education and training is to include these concepts in professional standards. To better understand the barrier of low professional confidence and perceived competence for engagement with SFS-related practice, the purpose of this research was to investigate dietetic training standards for SFS content and to highlight opportunities for growth within the profession. Questions posed by this research are: (1) how, if at all, are SFS and diets articulated in dietetic training standards, and (2) to what level of cognitive complexity? Methods: A content analysis of dietetic training standards documents was conducted between 15 April and 15 September 2021. Search terms included 'sustain*' or 'sustainable', 'food systems' and/or 'diets'. Extracted data with applicable SFS content were analysed for level of cognitive complexity requirements. Results: Of 47 National Dietetics Associations, researchers obtained 23 dietetic training standards documents, of which 16 included SFS-related content. The majority of documents used broad descriptors of the concepts, with little granularity and at a lower level of cognitive complexity.
在营养学教育中展示可持续性--机遇与挑战
背景:专业信心不足和能力感知不足是将可持续食物系统(SFS)和饮食融入营养学实践的实际障碍。将这些概念纳入专业标准是促进营养学教育和培训更系统整合的一个机会。为了更好地了解参与可持续食物系统相关实践的低专业信心和认知能力所带来的障碍,本研究旨在调查可持续食物系统内容的营养师培训标准,并强调该行业内的发展机会。本研究提出的问题是(1) 营养学培训标准是如何阐述 SFS 和饮食的?研究方法:在 2021 年 4 月 15 日至 9 月 15 日期间对营养师培训标准文件进行了内容分析。搜索关键词包括 "维持*"或 "可持续"、"食品系统 "和/或 "饮食"。根据认知复杂度的要求,对提取的具有适用 SFS 内容的数据进行分析。结果:在 47 个国家营养学协会中,研究人员获得了 23 份营养学培训标准文件,其中 16 份包含与 SFS 相关的内容。大多数文件对概念使用了宽泛的描述,颗粒度很小,认知复杂度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信