Parkinson's Disease Psychosis and the Marketing of Pimavanserin.

0 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Daisy Daeschler, A. Fugh-Berman
{"title":"Parkinson's Disease Psychosis and the Marketing of Pimavanserin.","authors":"Daisy Daeschler, A. Fugh-Berman","doi":"10.1177/27551938241231531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2016, Nuplazid (pimavanserin) became the first FDA-approved treatment for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis (PDP). We explored the possibility that PDP was a term created to market Nuplazid. We examined trends in perceptions of psychosis in Parkinson's disease from the 1990s to 2020 through MEDLINE search term frequency, neurology textbooks, guidance from professional societies, Acadia annual reports, sponsored websites, and a sponsored meeting held by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). We analyzed continuing medical education (CME) activities on PDP and analyzed the connection between payments by the manufacturer of pimavanserin and prescriptions. Our analysis of nine sponsored CME activities reveals misleading themes, including: PDP is common, progressive, and not always drug-induced; there is no such thing as a benign hallucination, and psychotic symptoms always worsen; PDP increases mortality; and competing treatments are ineffective or dangerous while pimavanserin is safe and effective for treating PDP. Industry-sponsored CME was used to disseminate inaccurate and misleading marketing messages on psychosis related to Parkinson's disease. Some professional societies and some textbooks also resisted the PDP label. Reframing PDP as a unique condition is a typical example of condition branding. The establishment of PDP expanded the use of pimavanserin and is likely to have resulted in many avoidable deaths.","PeriodicalId":73479,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","volume":"107 9","pages":"27551938241231531"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938241231531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016, Nuplazid (pimavanserin) became the first FDA-approved treatment for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis (PDP). We explored the possibility that PDP was a term created to market Nuplazid. We examined trends in perceptions of psychosis in Parkinson's disease from the 1990s to 2020 through MEDLINE search term frequency, neurology textbooks, guidance from professional societies, Acadia annual reports, sponsored websites, and a sponsored meeting held by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). We analyzed continuing medical education (CME) activities on PDP and analyzed the connection between payments by the manufacturer of pimavanserin and prescriptions. Our analysis of nine sponsored CME activities reveals misleading themes, including: PDP is common, progressive, and not always drug-induced; there is no such thing as a benign hallucination, and psychotic symptoms always worsen; PDP increases mortality; and competing treatments are ineffective or dangerous while pimavanserin is safe and effective for treating PDP. Industry-sponsored CME was used to disseminate inaccurate and misleading marketing messages on psychosis related to Parkinson's disease. Some professional societies and some textbooks also resisted the PDP label. Reframing PDP as a unique condition is a typical example of condition branding. The establishment of PDP expanded the use of pimavanserin and is likely to have resulted in many avoidable deaths.
帕金森病精神病与 Pimavanserin 的营销。
2016 年,Nuplazid(pimavanserin)成为 FDA 批准的首个治疗帕金森病精神病(PDP)的药物。我们探讨了帕金森病精神病(PDP)是否可能是为了推销 Nuplazid 而创造的一个术语。我们通过 MEDLINE 搜索词频率、神经病学教科书、专业协会指南、Acadia 年度报告、赞助网站以及美国国立卫生研究院 (NIH) 主办的一次会议,研究了 20 世纪 90 年代至 2020 年帕金森病精神病的认知趋势。我们分析了 PDP 上的继续医学教育 (CME) 活动,并分析了匹马伐林生产商的付款与处方之间的联系。我们对九项受赞助的继续医学教育活动进行的分析揭示了一些具有误导性的主题,包括PDP 是一种常见的、渐进的疾病,并不总是由药物引起;不存在良性幻觉,精神病症状总是会恶化;PDP 会增加死亡率;其他治疗方法无效或危险,而匹马凡色林对治疗 PDP 是安全有效的。行业赞助的继续医学教育被用来传播与帕金森病有关的精神病的不准确和误导性营销信息。一些专业协会和教科书也抵制帕金森病的标签。将帕金森病重塑为一种独特的病症是病症品牌化的一个典型例子。PDP 的确立扩大了匹马伐林的使用范围,很可能导致许多本可避免的死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信