How should platforms be archived? On sustainable use practices of a Telegram Archive to study Russia’s war against Ukraine

Miglė Bareikytė, M. Makhortykh, Alexander Martin, Taras Nazaruk, Yarden Skop
{"title":"How should platforms be archived? On sustainable use practices of a Telegram Archive to study Russia’s war against Ukraine","authors":"Miglė Bareikytė, M. Makhortykh, Alexander Martin, Taras Nazaruk, Yarden Skop","doi":"10.1177/01634437241245915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After Russia’s war against Ukraine destroyed people’s ability to move and communicate freely in Ukraine, many Ukrainians turned to social media and messenger apps, especially Telegram, to produce and share information. The vast amount of this digital data is privatized, ephemeral, and difficult to utilize for research, raising urgent questions about its sustainable accessibility and usability. In this article, we explore a specific aspect of digital archive sustainability – the use of digital archives to preserve platform data related to Russia’s war against Ukraine – by focusing on data integrity, usability, and ethics. Our research is based on a case study of an interdisciplinary Data Sprint, “Russia’s War in Ukraine,” organized in collaboration with a Telegram Archive, in which academics and practitioners investigated qualitative approaches to studying a war on Telegram. In the article, we explore the possibilities and drawbacks of sustainable use of the Telegram Archive for qualitative approaches – semantic, visual, spatial, and link analysis – to working with large amounts of data. We argue that the sustainability of digital archives depends not only on their use, based on consistently stored and accessible data, but also the ethical aspects of their use for diverse research needs.","PeriodicalId":427430,"journal":{"name":"Media, Culture & Society","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241245915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After Russia’s war against Ukraine destroyed people’s ability to move and communicate freely in Ukraine, many Ukrainians turned to social media and messenger apps, especially Telegram, to produce and share information. The vast amount of this digital data is privatized, ephemeral, and difficult to utilize for research, raising urgent questions about its sustainable accessibility and usability. In this article, we explore a specific aspect of digital archive sustainability – the use of digital archives to preserve platform data related to Russia’s war against Ukraine – by focusing on data integrity, usability, and ethics. Our research is based on a case study of an interdisciplinary Data Sprint, “Russia’s War in Ukraine,” organized in collaboration with a Telegram Archive, in which academics and practitioners investigated qualitative approaches to studying a war on Telegram. In the article, we explore the possibilities and drawbacks of sustainable use of the Telegram Archive for qualitative approaches – semantic, visual, spatial, and link analysis – to working with large amounts of data. We argue that the sustainability of digital archives depends not only on their use, based on consistently stored and accessible data, but also the ethical aspects of their use for diverse research needs.
平台应如何存档?研究俄罗斯对乌克兰战争的 Telegram 档案的可持续使用实践
俄罗斯对乌克兰的战争摧毁了乌克兰人民自由行动和交流的能力,许多乌克兰人转而使用社交媒体和信使应用程序,尤其是 Telegram,来生产和分享信息。这些数字数据大量私有化、短暂且难以用于研究,从而引发了有关其可持续访问性和可用性的紧迫问题。在本文中,我们探讨了数字档案可持续性的一个具体方面--使用数字档案保存与俄罗斯对乌克兰战争有关的平台数据--重点关注数据的完整性、可用性和道德。我们的研究以跨学科数据冲刺 "俄罗斯在乌克兰的战争 "的案例研究为基础,该冲刺是与 Telegram 档案馆合作组织的,学术界和从业人员在其中调查了研究 Telegram 上战争的定性方法。在这篇文章中,我们探讨了可持续利用 Telegram 档案馆的定性方法--语义、视觉、空间和链接分析--来处理大量数据的可能性和缺点。我们认为,数字档案的可持续性不仅取决于基于持续存储和访问数据的使用情况,还取决于将其用于满足不同研究需求的道德方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信