Effects of Anterior Fundoplication on Postoperative Dysphagia and Reflux After Laparoscopic Esophagocardiomyotomy for Pediatric Achalasia.

Mary Peyton French, Jordan Busing, Sari Acra, Heidi Chen, Laura Stafman, Irving Zamora, Michael Holzman, Harold N Lovvorn
{"title":"Effects of Anterior Fundoplication on Postoperative Dysphagia and Reflux After Laparoscopic Esophagocardiomyotomy for Pediatric Achalasia.","authors":"Mary Peyton French, Jordan Busing, Sari Acra, Heidi Chen, Laura Stafman, Irving Zamora, Michael Holzman, Harold N Lovvorn","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Achalasia among children often fails endoscopic management (e.g., dilation, botulinum toxin). Laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy (L-ECM) is a standard intervention to relieve obstruction but can induce gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Concurrent anterior fundoplication (A-fundo) has been evaluated in randomized trials among adults, demonstrating mixed results on controlling postoperative GER without exacerbating dysphagia. Furthermore, evidence for the best approach among children remains sparse. We hypothesized that, among children undergoing L-ECM without mucosal violation, routine A-fundo would not improve postoperative GER control while exacerbating dysphagia. Materials and Methods: Observational data of 47 consecutive achalasia patients ≤18 years who received L-ECM (2002-2023) at a single academic institution were collected. Patient records were culled for demographics, achalasia characteristics, and outcomes. Two L-ECM groups were identified: with or without A-fundo. Patients were screened for postoperative dysphagia (additional procedures) and GER (new antireflux medications). Univariate independence testing was conducted to identify statistically significant variables. Results: Among 47 patients undergoing L-ECM, 28 (59.6%) received concurrent A-fundo. Compared with patients undergoing L-ECM alone, patients with L-ECM/A-fundo had significantly longer hospital stays (P < .01) without statistically different rates of postoperative dysphagia (P = .81) or GER (P = .51). Five children (10.6%) experienced mucosal injury with L-ECM: 4 recognized intraoperatively received A-Fundo without subsequent leak; 1 mucosal injury was missed and did not receive A-Fundo, which subsequently leaked. Conclusion: In this largest observation of pediatric achalasia patients, A-fundo appeared clinically insignificant when determining contributors to control GER or exacerbate postoperative dysphagia. A-fundo should not be routinely adopted in children having L-ECM for achalasia without further multicenter analysis but appears beneficial in cases having inadvertent mucosal violation.","PeriodicalId":508448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achalasia among children often fails endoscopic management (e.g., dilation, botulinum toxin). Laparoscopic esophagocardiomyotomy (L-ECM) is a standard intervention to relieve obstruction but can induce gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Concurrent anterior fundoplication (A-fundo) has been evaluated in randomized trials among adults, demonstrating mixed results on controlling postoperative GER without exacerbating dysphagia. Furthermore, evidence for the best approach among children remains sparse. We hypothesized that, among children undergoing L-ECM without mucosal violation, routine A-fundo would not improve postoperative GER control while exacerbating dysphagia. Materials and Methods: Observational data of 47 consecutive achalasia patients ≤18 years who received L-ECM (2002-2023) at a single academic institution were collected. Patient records were culled for demographics, achalasia characteristics, and outcomes. Two L-ECM groups were identified: with or without A-fundo. Patients were screened for postoperative dysphagia (additional procedures) and GER (new antireflux medications). Univariate independence testing was conducted to identify statistically significant variables. Results: Among 47 patients undergoing L-ECM, 28 (59.6%) received concurrent A-fundo. Compared with patients undergoing L-ECM alone, patients with L-ECM/A-fundo had significantly longer hospital stays (P < .01) without statistically different rates of postoperative dysphagia (P = .81) or GER (P = .51). Five children (10.6%) experienced mucosal injury with L-ECM: 4 recognized intraoperatively received A-Fundo without subsequent leak; 1 mucosal injury was missed and did not receive A-Fundo, which subsequently leaked. Conclusion: In this largest observation of pediatric achalasia patients, A-fundo appeared clinically insignificant when determining contributors to control GER or exacerbate postoperative dysphagia. A-fundo should not be routinely adopted in children having L-ECM for achalasia without further multicenter analysis but appears beneficial in cases having inadvertent mucosal violation.
腹腔镜食管心肌切除术治疗小儿噎膈术后前胃底折叠术对术后吞咽困难和反流的影响
导言:儿童 Achalasia 通常无法通过内窥镜治疗(如扩张术、肉毒杆菌毒素)。腹腔镜食管心肌切开术(L-ECM)是缓解梗阻的标准干预措施,但会诱发胃食管反流(GER)。同时进行的前胃底折叠术(A-fundo)已在成人中进行了随机试验评估,结果显示,在控制术后胃食管反流而不加重吞咽困难方面的效果不一。此外,有关儿童最佳方法的证据仍然很少。我们假设,在接受无粘膜侵犯的 L-ECM 的儿童中,常规 A-fundo 不会改善术后胃食管反流控制,同时加重吞咽困难。材料和方法:收集在一家学术机构接受 L-ECM 的 47 名 18 岁以下连续贲门失弛缓症患者(2002-2023 年)的观察数据。根据人口统计学、贲门失弛缓症特征和疗效对患者记录进行了筛选。确定了两组 L-ECM 患者:有 A-fundo 或无 A-fundo 患者。对患者进行了术后吞咽困难(额外手术)和胃食管反流(新的抗反流药物)筛查。进行了单变量独立性测试,以确定具有统计学意义的变量。结果:在 47 位接受 L-ECM 的患者中,28 位(59.6%)同时接受了 A-fundo 治疗。与单独接受 L-ECM 的患者相比,接受 L-ECM/A-fundo 的患者住院时间明显更长(P < .01),但术后吞咽困难(P = .81)或胃食管反流(P = .51)的发生率没有统计学差异。五名患儿(10.6%)在使用 L-ECM 时出现了粘膜损伤:4 名患儿在术中接受了 A-Fundo 治疗,随后没有出现渗漏;1 名患儿的粘膜损伤被漏诊,没有接受 A-Fundo 治疗,随后出现了渗漏。结论:在这次对小儿贲门失弛缓症患者进行的最大规模观察中,在确定控制胃食管反流或加重术后吞咽困难的因素时,A-fundo在临床上似乎并不重要。在没有进一步多中心分析的情况下,A-fundo 不应常规用于接受 L-ECM 治疗的贲门失弛缓症患儿,但似乎对无意中侵犯粘膜的病例有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信