Prejudice Transformation from Overt to Covert Forms as an Indicator of its Functions in Intergroup Relations

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
M.V. Kotova
{"title":"Prejudice Transformation from Overt to Covert Forms as an Indicator of its Functions in Intergroup Relations","authors":"M.V. Kotova","doi":"10.17759/sps.2024150104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The study is aimed to clarify the understanding of the functions of prejudice in intergroup relations. A comparison of approaches to explaining intergroup relations and an analysis of the transformation of prejudice into covert, subtle forms were applied in order to achieve the aim. Background. The plasticity of prejudice, its transformation into covert, subtle forms in response to equal rights movements and social inadmissibility, the inconsistencies in the prejudice reduction techniques effectiveness indicates that something fundamental about the nature of prejudice is being missed by researchers. The persistent negativity of prejudice suggests that one should look for this “missing” in the concept of functions. The functions of prejudice per se have not been a focus of research attention yet. Methodology. The rationale was based on functional analysis in psychology, sociology and social anthropology.Conclusions. The persistence, “inflexibility” of a negative attitude is an essential trait of prejudice, and not just an imperfection of its first definitions. It points to the functions that prejudice fulfills in intergroup relations, that is, it leads to a positive, a useful result for the system (society and its structure). Features of the transformation of prejudice into covert forms show that preserving the entitativity and the boundaries of the group (which is the unit of this system) in a “loose” egalitarian society seems to be prejudice function.","PeriodicalId":54079,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2024150104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. The study is aimed to clarify the understanding of the functions of prejudice in intergroup relations. A comparison of approaches to explaining intergroup relations and an analysis of the transformation of prejudice into covert, subtle forms were applied in order to achieve the aim. Background. The plasticity of prejudice, its transformation into covert, subtle forms in response to equal rights movements and social inadmissibility, the inconsistencies in the prejudice reduction techniques effectiveness indicates that something fundamental about the nature of prejudice is being missed by researchers. The persistent negativity of prejudice suggests that one should look for this “missing” in the concept of functions. The functions of prejudice per se have not been a focus of research attention yet. Methodology. The rationale was based on functional analysis in psychology, sociology and social anthropology.Conclusions. The persistence, “inflexibility” of a negative attitude is an essential trait of prejudice, and not just an imperfection of its first definitions. It points to the functions that prejudice fulfills in intergroup relations, that is, it leads to a positive, a useful result for the system (society and its structure). Features of the transformation of prejudice into covert forms show that preserving the entitativity and the boundaries of the group (which is the unit of this system) in a “loose” egalitarian society seems to be prejudice function.
偏见从显性到隐性的转变是其在群体间关系中发挥作用的指标
研究目的本研究旨在澄清对偏见在群体间关系中的作用的理解。为了实现这一目标,我们对解释群体间关系的方法进行了比较,并对偏见转变为隐蔽、微妙的形式进行了分析。背景。偏见的可塑性、偏见在平等权利运动和社会不允许的情况下向隐蔽、微妙形式的转变、减少偏见技术效果的不一致性,都表明研究人员忽略了偏见本质的一些根本性问题。偏见的持续负面性表明,我们应该在功能概念中寻找这种 "缺失"。偏见的功能本身尚未成为研究关注的焦点。研究方法。以心理学、社会学和社会人类学的功能分析为基础。负面态度的持久性和 "不灵活性 "是偏见的基本特征,而不仅仅是其最初定义的不完善之处。它指出了偏见在群体间关系中发挥的作用,即偏见会给系统(社会及其结构)带来积极的、有用的结果。偏见转变为隐蔽形式的特征表明,在一个 "松散 "的平等主义社会中,维护群体(这是这一系统的单位)的实体性和界限似乎是偏见的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Psychology and Society
Social Psychology and Society PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信