The Effect of Augmented Feedback on the Hit Accuracy of Foil Fencers

Q4 Social Sciences
Manal M. Bayyat, Anas AlKayeed
{"title":"The Effect of Augmented Feedback on the Hit Accuracy of Foil Fencers","authors":"Manal M. Bayyat, Anas AlKayeed","doi":"10.5817/sts2024-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to investigate the effect of augmented feedback on the hit accuracy of foil fencers. A total of 10 fencing players, juniors and cadets registered at the XX fencing federation were divided into control and experimental groups. The ‘Fencing Scouting Sheet / Foil’ instrument was developed to collect the required data divided into ‘Touches scored’, ‘Touches received’, ‘Touches scored out of target’ and ‘Touches received out of target’. Each player of the experimental and control group played 20 bouts; each bout was scouted and calculated by the coach using a scouting sheet. The total of each group member (experimental and control) was calculated (100 games for each group). Coaches provided the experimental group players with the proper augmented feedback based on each player’s performance. Individually or in group before, during, or after the bouts. The results of the study indicated that the experimental group was 37.4 % higher than the control group in ‘Touches scored’, but less by 36.7%, 59.3% and 19.3% in ‘Touches received’, ‘Touches scored out of target’ and ‘Touches received out of target’ respectively. We encourage future studies to implement the scouting sheet developed to enhance the quality of training sessions and the players' performance. ","PeriodicalId":36179,"journal":{"name":"Studia Sportiva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Sportiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/sts2024-1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the effect of augmented feedback on the hit accuracy of foil fencers. A total of 10 fencing players, juniors and cadets registered at the XX fencing federation were divided into control and experimental groups. The ‘Fencing Scouting Sheet / Foil’ instrument was developed to collect the required data divided into ‘Touches scored’, ‘Touches received’, ‘Touches scored out of target’ and ‘Touches received out of target’. Each player of the experimental and control group played 20 bouts; each bout was scouted and calculated by the coach using a scouting sheet. The total of each group member (experimental and control) was calculated (100 games for each group). Coaches provided the experimental group players with the proper augmented feedback based on each player’s performance. Individually or in group before, during, or after the bouts. The results of the study indicated that the experimental group was 37.4 % higher than the control group in ‘Touches scored’, but less by 36.7%, 59.3% and 19.3% in ‘Touches received’, ‘Touches scored out of target’ and ‘Touches received out of target’ respectively. We encourage future studies to implement the scouting sheet developed to enhance the quality of training sessions and the players' performance. 
增强反馈对花剑运动员击球准确性的影响
本研究旨在探讨增强反馈对花剑运动员击球准确性的影响。研究人员将在 XX 击剑联合会注册的 10 名击剑运动员、青少年和学员分为对照组和实验组。我们开发了 "击剑侦察表/花剑 "工具来收集所需的数据,分为 "击打得分"、"击打得分"、"击打得分偏离目标 "和 "击打得分偏离目标"。实验组和对照组的每名球员都参加了 20 场比赛;每场比赛都由教练使用球探表进行球探和计算。计算出每组(实验组和对照组)成员的总成绩(每组 100 场比赛)。教练根据每个球员的表现向实验组球员提供适当的增强反馈。无论是在比赛前、比赛中还是比赛后,都会单独或集体进行反馈。研究结果表明,实验组在 "触球得分 "方面比对照组高 37.4%,但在 "触球得分"、"触球得分偏离目标 "和 "触球得分偏离目标 "方面分别比对照组低 36.7%、59.3% 和 19.3%。我们鼓励今后的研究采用所开发的球探表,以提高训练课的质量和球员的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Sportiva
Studia Sportiva Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信