A Single Hospital-Wide Antibiogram is Insufficient to Account for Differences in Antibiotic Resistance Patterns Across Multiple ICUs.

Shem K. Blackley, Jay Lawrence, Addison C. Blevins, Caroline W Howell, C. Butts, Nathan M. Polite, Thomas J. Capasso, Andrew C. Bright, Kayla A Hall, Andrew N. Haiflich, Ashley Y Williams, Christopher M. Kinnard, Maryann I. Mbaka, Jonathon P. Audia, Jon D. Simmons, Yannleei L. Lee
{"title":"A Single Hospital-Wide Antibiogram is Insufficient to Account for Differences in Antibiotic Resistance Patterns Across Multiple ICUs.","authors":"Shem K. Blackley, Jay Lawrence, Addison C. Blevins, Caroline W Howell, C. Butts, Nathan M. Polite, Thomas J. Capasso, Andrew C. Bright, Kayla A Hall, Andrew N. Haiflich, Ashley Y Williams, Christopher M. Kinnard, Maryann I. Mbaka, Jonathon P. Audia, Jon D. Simmons, Yannleei L. Lee","doi":"10.1177/00031348241241636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nInfection is a common cause of mortality within intensive care units (ICUs). Antibiotic resistance patterns and culture data are used to create antibiograms. Knowledge of antibiograms facilitates guiding empiric therapies and reduces mortality. Most major hospitals utilize data collection to create hospital-wide antibiograms. Previous studies have shown significant differences in susceptibility patterns between hospital wards and ICUs. We hypothesize that institutional or combined ICU antibiograms are inadequate to account for differences in susceptibility for patients in individual ICUs.\n\n\nMETHODS\nCulture and susceptibility data were reviewed over a 1-year period for 13 bacteria in the following ICUs: Surgical/Trauma, Medical, Neuroscience, Burn, and Emergency department. Antibiotic management decisions are made by individual teams.\n\n\nRESULTS\nNine species had sufficient data for inclusion into an All-ICU antibiogram. E coli and S aureus were the most common isolates. Seven species had significant differences in susceptibility patterns between ICUs. E cloacae showed higher rates of resistance to multiple antibiotics in the STICU than other ICUs. P aeruginosa susceptibility rates in the NSICU and BICU were 88% and 92%, respectively, compared to 60% and 55% in the STICU and MICU. Cephalosporins and Aztreonam had reduced efficacy against E coli in the NSICU, however remain effective in other ICUs.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe results of this study show that different ICUs do have variability in antibiotic susceptibility patterns within a single hospital. While this only represents a single institution, it shows that the use of hospital-wide antibiograms is inadequate for creating empiric antibiotic protocols within individual ICUs.","PeriodicalId":325363,"journal":{"name":"The American Surgeon","volume":"207 2","pages":"31348241241636"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241241636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Infection is a common cause of mortality within intensive care units (ICUs). Antibiotic resistance patterns and culture data are used to create antibiograms. Knowledge of antibiograms facilitates guiding empiric therapies and reduces mortality. Most major hospitals utilize data collection to create hospital-wide antibiograms. Previous studies have shown significant differences in susceptibility patterns between hospital wards and ICUs. We hypothesize that institutional or combined ICU antibiograms are inadequate to account for differences in susceptibility for patients in individual ICUs. METHODS Culture and susceptibility data were reviewed over a 1-year period for 13 bacteria in the following ICUs: Surgical/Trauma, Medical, Neuroscience, Burn, and Emergency department. Antibiotic management decisions are made by individual teams. RESULTS Nine species had sufficient data for inclusion into an All-ICU antibiogram. E coli and S aureus were the most common isolates. Seven species had significant differences in susceptibility patterns between ICUs. E cloacae showed higher rates of resistance to multiple antibiotics in the STICU than other ICUs. P aeruginosa susceptibility rates in the NSICU and BICU were 88% and 92%, respectively, compared to 60% and 55% in the STICU and MICU. Cephalosporins and Aztreonam had reduced efficacy against E coli in the NSICU, however remain effective in other ICUs. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study show that different ICUs do have variability in antibiotic susceptibility patterns within a single hospital. While this only represents a single institution, it shows that the use of hospital-wide antibiograms is inadequate for creating empiric antibiotic protocols within individual ICUs.
单一的全院抗生素造影不足以解释多个重症监护室的抗生素耐药性模式差异。
背景感染是重症监护病房(ICU)内常见的死亡原因。抗生素耐药性模式和培养数据可用于绘制抗生素图谱。了解抗生素图谱有助于指导经验疗法并降低死亡率。大多数大型医院都利用数据收集来创建全院抗生素图谱。以往的研究表明,医院病房和重症监护室之间的药敏模式存在显著差异。我们假设,机构或综合重症监护室抗生素图不足以解释个别重症监护室患者对抗生素的敏感性差异。方法对以下重症监护室一年内 13 种细菌的培养和敏感性数据进行审查:方法对以下 ICU 中 13 种细菌 1 年内的培养和药敏数据进行审查:外科/创伤科、内科、神经科学科、烧伤科和急诊科。结果有九种细菌的数据足以纳入全 ICU 抗生素图谱。大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的分离菌。不同重症监护病房对 7 个菌种的药敏模式存在明显差异。在 STICU,大肠杆菌对多种抗生素的耐药率高于其他 ICU。铜绿假单胞菌在 NSICU 和 BICU 的药敏率分别为 88% 和 92%,而在 STICU 和 MICU 则分别为 60% 和 55%。头孢菌素和阿奇霉素在 NSICU 中对大肠杆菌的疗效降低,但在其他 ICU 中仍然有效。虽然这只代表了一家医院,但它表明,使用全院范围的抗生素图谱不足以在各个重症监护室内制定经验性抗生素方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信