{"title":"Measuring the effectiveness of budget expenditures","authors":"N. Akindinova, A. Chernyavsky, A. Chepel","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2024-4-92-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the issues of measuring the effectiveness of budget expenditures on the basis of international comparisons using the DEA method . Macroeconomic (Musgrevian) indicators as well as sectoral performance indicators in relation to administrative expenditures, education and healthcare were used. Expenditure indicators were the share of budget expenditures in GDP and indicators of expenditure on education and health care per capita. We assess the integral efficiency of budget expenditures, based simultaneously on macro economic and sectoral indicators, as well as separately the effectiveness of expenditures on health care and education. In the DEA efficiency calculations, models with one performance indicator and one type of input and models with several types of costs and benefits were used. It is noted that when calculating integral efficiency, the highest results were achieved during the two periods under consideration by countries both with high results and with a low level of costs, the same applies to calculations of sectoral efficiency. When calculating comparative efficiency, the most favorable results for Russia are related to the calculations of the effectiveness of budget expenditures for education (secondary one). According to the first model of calculations based on DEA, Russia and three other countries are at the efficiency frontier in a sample of 41 countries. It is also noted that Russia’s results in education are higher than in the countries with a similar level of spending.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-4-92-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article discusses the issues of measuring the effectiveness of budget expenditures on the basis of international comparisons using the DEA method . Macroeconomic (Musgrevian) indicators as well as sectoral performance indicators in relation to administrative expenditures, education and healthcare were used. Expenditure indicators were the share of budget expenditures in GDP and indicators of expenditure on education and health care per capita. We assess the integral efficiency of budget expenditures, based simultaneously on macro economic and sectoral indicators, as well as separately the effectiveness of expenditures on health care and education. In the DEA efficiency calculations, models with one performance indicator and one type of input and models with several types of costs and benefits were used. It is noted that when calculating integral efficiency, the highest results were achieved during the two periods under consideration by countries both with high results and with a low level of costs, the same applies to calculations of sectoral efficiency. When calculating comparative efficiency, the most favorable results for Russia are related to the calculations of the effectiveness of budget expenditures for education (secondary one). According to the first model of calculations based on DEA, Russia and three other countries are at the efficiency frontier in a sample of 41 countries. It is also noted that Russia’s results in education are higher than in the countries with a similar level of spending.
文章讨论了在使用 DEA 方法进行国际比较的基础上衡量预算支出有效性的问题。使用了宏观经济(Musgrevian)指标以及与行政支出、教育和医疗有关的部门绩效指标。支出指标包括预算支出占国内生产总值的比重以及人均教育和医疗支出指标。我们同时根据宏观经济指标和部门指标来评估预算支出的整体效率,并分别评估医疗和教育支出的有效性。在计算 DEA 效率时,我们使用了一种绩效指标和一种投入类型的模型,以及几种成本和效益类型的模型。值得注意的是,在计算整体效率时,在审议的两个时期内,成果高和成本低的国家取得 的成果最高,部门效率的计算也是如此。在计算比较效率时,对俄罗斯最有利的结果与计算教育(中等教育)预算支出的效率有关。根据基于 DEA 的第一种计算模式,在 41 个国家的样本中,俄罗斯和其他三个国家处于效率前沿。我们还注意到,俄罗斯的教育成果高于支出水平类似的国家。