Exploring Mental Fatigue and Burnout in the Workplace: A Survival Analysis Approach

R. Eswar Reddy, Santhi K
{"title":"Exploring Mental Fatigue and Burnout in the Workplace: A Survival Analysis Approach","authors":"R. Eswar Reddy, Santhi K","doi":"10.4108/eetpht.10.5719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Employee burnout is a prevalent concern in contemporary workplaces, adversely impacting both individual well-being and organizational productivity. \nOBJECTIVES:  In this paper, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of a dataset focusing on mental fatigue and burnout among employees, employing various survival analysis techniques including Kaplan Meier, Nelson-Aalen, and Cox proportional-hazards models, as well as Frailty Models and Competing Risks Analysis. \nMETHODS:  This research underscored significant associations between mental fatigue, burnout, and adverse outcomes, emphasizing the critical need for early identification and intervention. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed differences in survival probabilities, while Nelson-Aalen analysis depicted cumulative hazard functions over time. Cox proportional-hazards models identified mental fatigue and burnout as significant predictors of adverse events, supported by Frailty Models accounting for individual-level variability. Additionally, Competing Risks Analysis elucidated the simultaneous occurrence of multiple adverse events among employees experiencing burnout. \nRESULTS: This research underscored significant associations between mental fatigue, burnout, and adverse outcomes, emphasizing the critical need for early identification and intervention. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed differences in survival probabilities, while Nelson-Aalen analysis depicted cumulative hazard functions over time. Cox proportional-hazards models identified mental fatigue and burnout as significant predictors of adverse events, supported by Frailty Models accounting for individual-level variability. Additionally, Competing Risks Analysis elucidated the simultaneous occurrence of multiple adverse events among employees experiencing burnout. \nCONCLUSION: This study contributes valuable insights into understanding and addressing mental fatigue in the workplace, highlighting the importance of evidence-based interventions to support employee well-being and organizational resilience. The insights gained from this analysis inform evidence-based strategies for mitigating burnout-related risks and promoting a healthier work environment.","PeriodicalId":506478,"journal":{"name":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology","volume":"2012 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.10.5719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Employee burnout is a prevalent concern in contemporary workplaces, adversely impacting both individual well-being and organizational productivity. OBJECTIVES:  In this paper, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of a dataset focusing on mental fatigue and burnout among employees, employing various survival analysis techniques including Kaplan Meier, Nelson-Aalen, and Cox proportional-hazards models, as well as Frailty Models and Competing Risks Analysis. METHODS:  This research underscored significant associations between mental fatigue, burnout, and adverse outcomes, emphasizing the critical need for early identification and intervention. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed differences in survival probabilities, while Nelson-Aalen analysis depicted cumulative hazard functions over time. Cox proportional-hazards models identified mental fatigue and burnout as significant predictors of adverse events, supported by Frailty Models accounting for individual-level variability. Additionally, Competing Risks Analysis elucidated the simultaneous occurrence of multiple adverse events among employees experiencing burnout. RESULTS: This research underscored significant associations between mental fatigue, burnout, and adverse outcomes, emphasizing the critical need for early identification and intervention. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed differences in survival probabilities, while Nelson-Aalen analysis depicted cumulative hazard functions over time. Cox proportional-hazards models identified mental fatigue and burnout as significant predictors of adverse events, supported by Frailty Models accounting for individual-level variability. Additionally, Competing Risks Analysis elucidated the simultaneous occurrence of multiple adverse events among employees experiencing burnout. CONCLUSION: This study contributes valuable insights into understanding and addressing mental fatigue in the workplace, highlighting the importance of evidence-based interventions to support employee well-being and organizational resilience. The insights gained from this analysis inform evidence-based strategies for mitigating burnout-related risks and promoting a healthier work environment.
探索工作场所的精神疲劳和职业倦怠:生存分析法
简介:员工职业倦怠是当代工作场所普遍关注的问题,对个人福祉和组织生产力都有不利影响。目的:在本文中,我们采用了各种生存分析技术,包括卡普兰-梅耶尔模型、尼尔森-阿伦模型、考克斯比例危害模型以及虚弱模型和竞争风险分析,对以员工精神疲劳和职业倦怠为重点的数据集进行了全面分析。方法:这项研究强调了精神疲劳、职业倦怠和不良后果之间的重要关联,强调了早期识别和干预的关键必要性。Kaplan Meier 分析显示了生存概率的差异,而 Nelson-Aalen 分析则描述了随时间变化的累积危险函数。Cox 比例危险模型确定了精神疲劳和职业倦怠是不良事件的重要预测因素,并得到了考虑了个体差异的虚弱模型的支持。此外,"竞争风险分析 "揭示了职业倦怠员工同时发生多种不良事件的情况。结果:这项研究强调了精神疲劳、职业倦怠和不良后果之间的重要关联,强调了早期识别和干预的关键必要性。Kaplan Meier 分析显示了生存概率的差异,而 Nelson-Aalen 分析则描述了随时间变化的累积危险函数。Cox 比例危险模型确定了精神疲劳和职业倦怠是不良事件的重要预测因素,并得到了考虑了个体差异的虚弱模型的支持。此外,"竞争风险分析 "揭示了职业倦怠员工同时发生多种不良事件的情况。结论:这项研究为了解和解决工作场所的精神疲劳问题提供了宝贵的见解,强调了以证据为基础的干预措施对于支持员工福祉和组织复原力的重要性。从这项分析中获得的见解为减轻与职业倦怠相关的风险和促进更健康的工作环境提供了循证策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书