‘Where’ is the evidence? A starting point for the development of place-based research reviews and their implications for wellbeing-related policymaking

IF 3.6 3区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Shukru Esmene, Michael Leyshon, Petra de Braal, Hans de Bruin, Catherine Leyshon
{"title":"‘Where’ is the evidence? A starting point for the development of place-based research reviews and their implications for wellbeing-related policymaking","authors":"Shukru Esmene,&nbsp;Michael Leyshon,&nbsp;Petra de Braal,&nbsp;Hans de Bruin,&nbsp;Catherine Leyshon","doi":"10.1111/geoj.12588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper aims to stimulate debate around the development of a place-based research review methodology. We present place-based reviews as a potential source of support for wellbeing-related local policymaking. Our introductory discussions highlight an ever-growing need for insights about specific localities and a lack in resources—including time—for local policymakers to engage with research. Additionally, increasing demands for local insights have been driven by devolution shifts, which redistribute policymaking responsibilities to local authorities. Hence, we explore the challenges and opportunities that arise when places are considered in reviewing research relevant to wellbeing. We build a case study around two related places of different scale: Truro, a small cathedral city in the United Kingdom's Southwest; and Cornwall, the regional county that contains Truro. We use these places as search terms in combination with terms concerning health and social care (HSC) services. HSC services are included as a component of our case study, as the topic is a consistent concern for wellbeing-related policies. In our findings, we report a lack of papers on our smaller scale of place (Truro). One might expect this outcome. Nonetheless, we reflect on current research practices and processes that might have further limited our ability to generate insights about Truro. Encouragingly, our findings on Cornwall demonstrate the potential of place-based reviews in supporting local policymaking more broadly. We make initial judgements around knowledge gaps—including the exclusion of perspectives from certain groups and identities—and topological insights, that is, those that are relevant to Cornwall as a whole. Our discussions also consider how place-based reviews can be enhanced via the retrieval and inclusion of non-academic studies. Finally, key questions to induce debate on this subject are posed in the conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":48023,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Journal","volume":"190 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geoj.12588","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geoj.12588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to stimulate debate around the development of a place-based research review methodology. We present place-based reviews as a potential source of support for wellbeing-related local policymaking. Our introductory discussions highlight an ever-growing need for insights about specific localities and a lack in resources—including time—for local policymakers to engage with research. Additionally, increasing demands for local insights have been driven by devolution shifts, which redistribute policymaking responsibilities to local authorities. Hence, we explore the challenges and opportunities that arise when places are considered in reviewing research relevant to wellbeing. We build a case study around two related places of different scale: Truro, a small cathedral city in the United Kingdom's Southwest; and Cornwall, the regional county that contains Truro. We use these places as search terms in combination with terms concerning health and social care (HSC) services. HSC services are included as a component of our case study, as the topic is a consistent concern for wellbeing-related policies. In our findings, we report a lack of papers on our smaller scale of place (Truro). One might expect this outcome. Nonetheless, we reflect on current research practices and processes that might have further limited our ability to generate insights about Truro. Encouragingly, our findings on Cornwall demonstrate the potential of place-based reviews in supporting local policymaking more broadly. We make initial judgements around knowledge gaps—including the exclusion of perspectives from certain groups and identities—and topological insights, that is, those that are relevant to Cornwall as a whole. Our discussions also consider how place-based reviews can be enhanced via the retrieval and inclusion of non-academic studies. Finally, key questions to induce debate on this subject are posed in the conclusion.

证据在哪里?以地方为基础的研究审查及其对福祉相关决策的影响的出发点
本文旨在激发人们围绕以地方为基础的研究综述方法的发展展开讨论。我们将基于地方的评论作为支持与福祉相关的地方决策的潜在来源。我们的介绍性讨论强调了对特定地方见解与日俱增的需求,以及地方决策者缺乏参与研究的资源(包括时间)。此外,由于权力下放,决策责任重新分配给了地方政府,因此对地方洞察力的需求日益增长。因此,我们探讨了在审查与福祉相关的研究时考虑地方因素所带来的挑战和机遇。我们围绕两个不同规模的相关地方开展案例研究:特鲁罗,英国西南部的一个小教堂城市;康沃尔,包含特鲁罗的地区郡。我们将这两个地方作为搜索关键词,并结合与健康和社会关怀(HSC)服务相关的关键词进行搜索。我们将 HSC 服务作为案例研究的一个组成部分,因为该主题是与福祉相关的政策始终关注的问题。在我们的研究结果中,我们发现缺乏关于较小规模地区(特鲁罗)的论文。这种结果是意料之中的。不过,我们对当前的研究实践和过程进行了反思,这些实践和过程可能进一步限制了我们对特鲁罗产生深刻见解的能力。令人鼓舞的是,我们对康沃尔郡的研究结果表明,以地方为基础的研究在更广泛地支持地方决策方面具有潜力。我们围绕知识差距(包括对某些群体和身份观点的排斥)和拓扑洞察力(即与整个康沃尔相关的洞察力)做出了初步判断。我们的讨论还考虑了如何通过检索和纳入非学术研究来加强基于地方的评论。最后,我们在结论中提出了一些关键问题,以引发对这一主题的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Geographical Journal has been the academic journal of the Royal Geographical Society, under the terms of the Royal Charter, since 1893. It publishes papers from across the entire subject of geography, with particular reference to public debates, policy-orientated agendas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信