Effects of conventional soil and water conservation measures on soil moisture of sloping land in the loess region

Water Supply Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.2166/ws.2024.074
Yuanyuan Chai, Xi Shi, Runxia Zhang, Chong Han
{"title":"Effects of conventional soil and water conservation measures on soil moisture of sloping land in the loess region","authors":"Yuanyuan Chai, Xi Shi, Runxia Zhang, Chong Han","doi":"10.2166/ws.2024.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n  Traditional soil conservation measures were widely recognized for their excellent ability to promote rainwater infiltration in the loess region. However, little is known about how these measures affect the soil moisture variations under natural rainfall conditions. To compare their effects on soil water content, four different treatments were conducted at runoff plots, i.e., super absorbent polymer amendment (SCR), ridge–furrow rainwater harvesting with plastic mulching (CRP), the same measure with CRP but without mulching (CRN), and flat planting (FSN, control), soil moisture at multiple slope positions and depths were periodically measured. The results showed that in the top 0- to 30-cm soil, SCR and CRN relatively greatly varied with time, yet CRP and FSN changed less. The mean soil water content of these treatments generally followed the pattern of CRN > SCR > CRP > FSN. Responding to a heavy rainfall event, the recharge and depletion rates of soil water storage generally showed similar patterns of SCR > CRN > CRP > FSN in the topsoil, yet in the deeper soil they followed the patterns of CRP > CRN > FSN > SCR. It suggested that SCR and CRN could improve the water accumulation and infiltration performances in the topsoil, and thus may be more suitable for rain-fed crop planting on sloping farmlands of the loess region.","PeriodicalId":509977,"journal":{"name":"Water Supply","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Supply","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2024.074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

 Traditional soil conservation measures were widely recognized for their excellent ability to promote rainwater infiltration in the loess region. However, little is known about how these measures affect the soil moisture variations under natural rainfall conditions. To compare their effects on soil water content, four different treatments were conducted at runoff plots, i.e., super absorbent polymer amendment (SCR), ridge–furrow rainwater harvesting with plastic mulching (CRP), the same measure with CRP but without mulching (CRN), and flat planting (FSN, control), soil moisture at multiple slope positions and depths were periodically measured. The results showed that in the top 0- to 30-cm soil, SCR and CRN relatively greatly varied with time, yet CRP and FSN changed less. The mean soil water content of these treatments generally followed the pattern of CRN > SCR > CRP > FSN. Responding to a heavy rainfall event, the recharge and depletion rates of soil water storage generally showed similar patterns of SCR > CRN > CRP > FSN in the topsoil, yet in the deeper soil they followed the patterns of CRP > CRN > FSN > SCR. It suggested that SCR and CRN could improve the water accumulation and infiltration performances in the topsoil, and thus may be more suitable for rain-fed crop planting on sloping farmlands of the loess region.
常规水土保持措施对黄土地区坡耕地土壤水分的影响
传统的水土保持措施因其促进黄土地区雨水渗透的卓越能力而得到广泛认可。然而,人们对这些措施如何影响自然降雨条件下的土壤水分变化知之甚少。为了比较这些措施对土壤含水量的影响,我们在径流地块采用了四种不同的处理方法,即超级吸水聚合物改良剂(SCR)、脊犁式雨水收集加塑料地膜覆盖(CRP)、同样的措施加CRP但不加地膜覆盖(CRN)以及平地种植(FSN,对照),并定期测量多个坡度位置和深度的土壤水分。结果表明,在顶部 0 至 30 厘米的土壤中,SCR 和 CRN 随时间的变化相对较大,而 CRP 和 FSN 变化较小。这些处理的平均土壤含水量一般遵循 CRN > SCR > CRP > FSN 的模式。在应对暴雨事件时,土壤储水的补给率和耗竭率在表层土壤中一般表现为 SCR > CRN > CRP > FSN,而在深层土壤中则表现为 CRP > CRN > FSN > SCR。这表明,SCR 和 CRN 可改善表层土壤的蓄水和入渗性能,因此可能更适合黄土地区坡耕地的雨养作物种植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信