From Research to Roach Traps: Practical Considerations for a Home-Based Asthma Program.

Natalie Talis, Nathaniel Lewis, Prakash Doraiswamy, Zhiyong Wu, Brittney Boakye
{"title":"From Research to Roach Traps: Practical Considerations for a Home-Based Asthma Program.","authors":"Natalie Talis, Nathaniel Lewis, Prakash Doraiswamy, Zhiyong Wu, Brittney Boakye","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nHome-based asthma interventions have a significant evidence base as an effective means to address moderate and severe breathing concerns triggered by home conditions. However, the literature lacks logistical and staffing considerations necessary to successfully implement such a program at a governmental level. This practice report and process evaluation outlines practical details and lessons learned during a healthy homes pilot, and how they were addressed in the design of a permanent program.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo inform the creation of a permanent home-based asthma intervention at the Alexandria Health Department (AHD) (City of Alexandria, Virginia) and understand the tools and resources necessary for success.\n\n\nINTERVENTION\nParticipating households received a health and environmental assessment, followed by cleaning supplies, relevant education, and referrals to partners for services. AHD staff tracked challenges and insights at each step of the intervention. At the end of the pilot, staff worked with the community to identify solutions and design a permanent program.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAlthough the pilot model was constructed based on existing case studies, technical assistance from national experts, and guidance documents, the team still experienced challenges around recruitment, staff support, home visit implementation, and impact evaluation. While pilots and existing literature can be instructive for identifying issues, work with residents and partners to develop a uniquely tailored community program was essential for practical success.\n\n\nIMPLICATIONS ON POLICY AND PRACTICE\nHealth departments developing new initiatives should consider both the staff and participant experience throughout the creation of administrative and programmatic processes. Testing out draft versions of these processes and materials using internal and external focus groups can identify potential bottlenecks and solutions upfront.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"1 1","pages":"E94-E101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT Home-based asthma interventions have a significant evidence base as an effective means to address moderate and severe breathing concerns triggered by home conditions. However, the literature lacks logistical and staffing considerations necessary to successfully implement such a program at a governmental level. This practice report and process evaluation outlines practical details and lessons learned during a healthy homes pilot, and how they were addressed in the design of a permanent program. OBJECTIVE To inform the creation of a permanent home-based asthma intervention at the Alexandria Health Department (AHD) (City of Alexandria, Virginia) and understand the tools and resources necessary for success. INTERVENTION Participating households received a health and environmental assessment, followed by cleaning supplies, relevant education, and referrals to partners for services. AHD staff tracked challenges and insights at each step of the intervention. At the end of the pilot, staff worked with the community to identify solutions and design a permanent program. CONCLUSIONS Although the pilot model was constructed based on existing case studies, technical assistance from national experts, and guidance documents, the team still experienced challenges around recruitment, staff support, home visit implementation, and impact evaluation. While pilots and existing literature can be instructive for identifying issues, work with residents and partners to develop a uniquely tailored community program was essential for practical success. IMPLICATIONS ON POLICY AND PRACTICE Health departments developing new initiatives should consider both the staff and participant experience throughout the creation of administrative and programmatic processes. Testing out draft versions of these processes and materials using internal and external focus groups can identify potential bottlenecks and solutions upfront.
从研究到蟑螂陷阱:家庭哮喘计划的实际考虑因素。
背景以家庭为基础的哮喘干预措施作为解决由家庭条件引发的中度和重度呼吸问题的有效手段,已经有了大量的证据基础。然而,文献中缺乏在政府层面成功实施此类计划所需的后勤和人员配备方面的考虑。本实践报告和过程评估概述了健康家庭试点过程中的实际细节和经验教训,以及在设计永久性计划时如何处理这些细节和经验教训。目标为亚历山大卫生局(AHD)(弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市)建立永久性家庭哮喘干预措施提供信息,并了解成功所需的工具和资源。干预措施参与家庭接受健康和环境评估,随后获得清洁用品、相关教育以及合作伙伴服务转介。美国卫生与发展协会的工作人员对干预措施每一步所面临的挑战和见解进行了跟踪。结论虽然试点模式是在现有案例研究、国家专家的技术援助和指导文件的基础上构建的,但团队在招募、员工支持、家访实施和影响评估方面仍然遇到了挑战。虽然试点项目和现有文献对发现问题具有指导意义,但与居民和合作伙伴合作开发独特的社区项目对取得实际成功至关重要。利用内部和外部焦点小组测试这些流程和材料的草案版本,可以提前发现潜在的瓶颈和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信