Qualitative Research of Robot-Helping Behaviors in a Field Trial

Sachie Yamada, Takayuki Kanda, Kanako Tomita
{"title":"Qualitative Research of Robot-Helping Behaviors in a Field Trial","authors":"Sachie Yamada, Takayuki Kanda, Kanako Tomita","doi":"10.1145/3640009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n During the previous field study with a robot and its interaction with mall visitors, we observed a surprising event during which a leaflet-distributing robot was abused, although it was subsequently helped by one of its previous abusers. After analyzing 72.25 hours of video data, we identified 47 cases where a robot dropped a leaflet and classified them according to following three criteria: 1) interaction between the potential helper or others with the robot\n before\n it dropped the leaflet, 2) the nature of the interaction (abused or not), and 3) whether it was helped. Using the Trajectory Equifinality Model (TEM), we analyzed 19 cases where the robot was helped. We identified the following interaction process that started with individuals who paid attention to the robot, whether they had abusive or non-abusive interactions with it, whether they noticed its failure, and finally whether they helped it. The presence of others encouraged the person to focus on the robot, and the interactions with it led to helping, regardless whether the interaction was abusive. The absence of others when the robot dropped the leaflet encouraged helping. The findings of this study will motivate interaction designs for social robots that can leverage human help.\n","PeriodicalId":504644,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3640009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the previous field study with a robot and its interaction with mall visitors, we observed a surprising event during which a leaflet-distributing robot was abused, although it was subsequently helped by one of its previous abusers. After analyzing 72.25 hours of video data, we identified 47 cases where a robot dropped a leaflet and classified them according to following three criteria: 1) interaction between the potential helper or others with the robot before it dropped the leaflet, 2) the nature of the interaction (abused or not), and 3) whether it was helped. Using the Trajectory Equifinality Model (TEM), we analyzed 19 cases where the robot was helped. We identified the following interaction process that started with individuals who paid attention to the robot, whether they had abusive or non-abusive interactions with it, whether they noticed its failure, and finally whether they helped it. The presence of others encouraged the person to focus on the robot, and the interactions with it led to helping, regardless whether the interaction was abusive. The absence of others when the robot dropped the leaflet encouraged helping. The findings of this study will motivate interaction designs for social robots that can leverage human help.
在现场试验中对机器人帮助行为的定性研究
在上一次对机器人及其与商场游客互动的实地研究中,我们观察到了一个令人惊讶的事件:一个发传单的机器人遭到了虐待,尽管它后来得到了之前虐待它的人的帮助。在分析了 72.25 小时的视频数据后,我们确定了 47 个机器人掉落传单的案例,并根据以下三个标准对它们进行了分类:1) 在机器人掉落传单之前,潜在帮助者或其他人与机器人之间的互动;2) 互动的性质(是否被滥用);3) 是否得到帮助。我们使用轨迹均衡模型(TEM)分析了 19 个机器人获得帮助的案例。我们确定了以下互动过程:从关注机器人的人开始,到与机器人进行虐待或非虐待性互动,再到是否注意到机器人的失败,最后到是否帮助了机器人。如果有其他人在场,就会鼓励人们将注意力集中在机器人身上,而与机器人的互动则会导致帮助,无论互动是否是虐待性的。当机器人掉落传单时,如果没有其他人在场,则会鼓励人们帮助机器人。这项研究的结果将推动社交机器人的交互设计,从而充分利用人类的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信