Scour depth variability controls channel-scale stratigraphy in experimental braided rivers

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY
Feifei Zhao, V. Ganti, Ajay B. Limaye
{"title":"Scour depth variability controls channel-scale stratigraphy in experimental braided rivers","authors":"Feifei Zhao, V. Ganti, Ajay B. Limaye","doi":"10.2110/jsr.2023.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Braided rivers distribute sediment across landscapes, often forming wide channel belts that are preserved in stratigraphy as coarse-grained deposits. Theoretical work has established quantitative links between the depth distribution of formative channels in a braided river and the geometry of their preserved strata. However, testing these predictive relationships between geomorphic process and stratigraphic product requires examining how braided rivers and their deposits coevolve, with high resolution in both space and time. Here, using a series of four runs of a physical experiment, we examine the controls of water discharge and slope on the resulting geometry of preserved deposits. Specifically, we focus on how a twofold variation in water discharge and initial riverbed slope affects the spatiotemporal distribution of channel depths and the geometry of preserved deposits of a braided river. We find that the channel depths in the laboratory experiment are described by a two-parameter gamma distributio n and the deepest scours correspond to zones of erosion at channel-belt margins and channel-thread confluences within the channel belt. We use a reduced complexity flow model to reconstruct flow depths, which were shallower compared to channel thalweg depths. Synthetic stratigraphy built from timeseries of topographic surfaces shows that the distribution of cut-and-fill unit thickness is invariant across the experiments and is determined by the variability in scour depths. We show that the distribution of cut-and-fill unit thickness can be used to reconstruct formative channel-depth distributions and that the mean thickness of these units is 0.31 to 0.62 times the mean formative flow depth across all experiments. Our results suggest that variations in discharge and slope do not translate to measurable differences in preserved cut-and-fill unit thickness, suggesting that changes in external forcings are only likely to be preserved in braided river deposits when they exceed a certain threshold of change.","PeriodicalId":17044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sedimentary Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sedimentary Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2023.118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Braided rivers distribute sediment across landscapes, often forming wide channel belts that are preserved in stratigraphy as coarse-grained deposits. Theoretical work has established quantitative links between the depth distribution of formative channels in a braided river and the geometry of their preserved strata. However, testing these predictive relationships between geomorphic process and stratigraphic product requires examining how braided rivers and their deposits coevolve, with high resolution in both space and time. Here, using a series of four runs of a physical experiment, we examine the controls of water discharge and slope on the resulting geometry of preserved deposits. Specifically, we focus on how a twofold variation in water discharge and initial riverbed slope affects the spatiotemporal distribution of channel depths and the geometry of preserved deposits of a braided river. We find that the channel depths in the laboratory experiment are described by a two-parameter gamma distributio n and the deepest scours correspond to zones of erosion at channel-belt margins and channel-thread confluences within the channel belt. We use a reduced complexity flow model to reconstruct flow depths, which were shallower compared to channel thalweg depths. Synthetic stratigraphy built from timeseries of topographic surfaces shows that the distribution of cut-and-fill unit thickness is invariant across the experiments and is determined by the variability in scour depths. We show that the distribution of cut-and-fill unit thickness can be used to reconstruct formative channel-depth distributions and that the mean thickness of these units is 0.31 to 0.62 times the mean formative flow depth across all experiments. Our results suggest that variations in discharge and slope do not translate to measurable differences in preserved cut-and-fill unit thickness, suggesting that changes in external forcings are only likely to be preserved in braided river deposits when they exceed a certain threshold of change.
冲刷深度变化控制着实验性辫状河流的河道尺度地层学
辫状河在地形上分布泥沙,往往形成宽阔的河道带,在地层中保存为粗粒沉积。理论研究已经在辫状河形成河道的深度分布与其保存地层的几何形状之间建立了定量联系。然而,要检验这些地貌过程与地层产物之间的预测关系,就需要对辫状河及其沉积物如何在空间和时间上进行高分辨率的共同演化进行研究。在这里,我们通过一系列四次物理实验,研究了排水量和坡度对所形成的保留沉积几何形状的控制作用。具体来说,我们重点研究了排水量和初始河床坡度的双重变化如何影响河道深度的时空分布和辫状河保留沉积的几何形状。我们发现,实验室实验中的河道深度是由双参数伽马分布描述的,最深的冲刷对应于河道带边缘的侵蚀区和河道带内的河道螺纹汇合处。我们使用复杂程度降低的水流模型来重建水流深度,水流深度比河道沿岸深度要浅。根据地形表面的时间序列建立的合成地层学表明,切填单元厚度的分布在整个实验中是不变的,由冲刷深度的变化决定。我们的研究表明,切填单元厚度的分布可用于重建形成河道深度的分布,在所有实验中,这些单元的平均厚度是平均形成水流深度的 0.31 至 0.62 倍。我们的结果表明,排水量和坡度的变化并不能转化为所保存的切填单元厚度的可测量差异,这表明外部作用力的变化只有在超过一定的变化阈值时才有可能保存在辫状河沉积中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal is broad and international in scope and welcomes contributions that further the fundamental understanding of sedimentary processes, the origin of sedimentary deposits, the workings of sedimentary systems, and the records of earth history contained within sedimentary rocks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信