Roles and Dynamics within Community Mental Health Systems During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.

Cheryl Su Ling Sim, P. Asharani, Mythily Subramaniam, Huso Yi
{"title":"Roles and Dynamics within Community Mental Health Systems During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.","authors":"Cheryl Su Ling Sim, P. Asharani, Mythily Subramaniam, Huso Yi","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2024.2314525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, COVID-19 had an immense impact on mental health systems, but research on how community mental health (CMH) systems and services contributed to the pandemic mental health response is limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-ethnography to understand the roles of CMH services, determinants of the quality of CMH care, and dynamics within CMH systems during COVID-19. We searched and screened across five databases and appraised study quality using the CASP tool, which yielded 27 qualitative studies. Our meta-ethnographic process used Noblit and Hare's approach for synthesizing findings and applying interpretive analysis to original research. This identified several key themes. Firstly, CMH systems played the valuable pandemic role of safety nets and networks for the broader mental health ecosystem, while CMH service providers offered a continuous relationship of trust to service users amidst pandemic disruptions. Secondly, we found that the determinants of quality CMH care during COVID-19 included resourcing and capacity, connections across service providers, customized care options, ease of access, and human connection. Finally, we observed that power dynamics across the CMH landscape disproportionately excluded marginalized groups from mainstream CMH systems and services. Our findings suggest that while the pandemic role of CMH was clear, effectiveness was driven by the efforts of individual service providers to meet demand and service users' needs. To reprise its pandemic role in the future, a concerted effort is needed to make CMH systems a valuable part of countries' disaster mental health response and to invest in quality care, particularly for marginalized groups.","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"9 3","pages":"2314525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2024.2314525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, COVID-19 had an immense impact on mental health systems, but research on how community mental health (CMH) systems and services contributed to the pandemic mental health response is limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-ethnography to understand the roles of CMH services, determinants of the quality of CMH care, and dynamics within CMH systems during COVID-19. We searched and screened across five databases and appraised study quality using the CASP tool, which yielded 27 qualitative studies. Our meta-ethnographic process used Noblit and Hare's approach for synthesizing findings and applying interpretive analysis to original research. This identified several key themes. Firstly, CMH systems played the valuable pandemic role of safety nets and networks for the broader mental health ecosystem, while CMH service providers offered a continuous relationship of trust to service users amidst pandemic disruptions. Secondly, we found that the determinants of quality CMH care during COVID-19 included resourcing and capacity, connections across service providers, customized care options, ease of access, and human connection. Finally, we observed that power dynamics across the CMH landscape disproportionately excluded marginalized groups from mainstream CMH systems and services. Our findings suggest that while the pandemic role of CMH was clear, effectiveness was driven by the efforts of individual service providers to meet demand and service users' needs. To reprise its pandemic role in the future, a concerted effort is needed to make CMH systems a valuable part of countries' disaster mental health response and to invest in quality care, particularly for marginalized groups.
COVID-19 大流行期间社区心理健康系统中的角色和动态:定性系统综述和 Meta-Ethnography。
在全球范围内,COVID-19 对精神卫生系统产生了巨大的影响,但有关社区精神卫生(CMH)系统和服务如何促进大流行性精神卫生应对措施的研究却十分有限。我们开展了一项系统性综述和元民族志研究,以了解在 COVID-19 期间社区精神卫生服务的作用、社区精神卫生护理质量的决定因素以及社区精神卫生系统内部的动态变化。我们在五个数据库中进行了搜索和筛选,并使用 CASP 工具对研究质量进行了评估,最终得出了 27 项定性研究。我们采用 Noblit 和 Hare 的元人种学方法对研究结果进行综合,并将解释性分析应用于原创研究。这确定了几个关键主题。首先,精神卫生中心系统在大流行期间为更广泛的精神卫生生态系统发挥了安全网和网络的重要作用,而精神卫生中心的服务提供者则在大流行期间为服务使用者提供了持续的信任关系。其次,我们发现,在 COVID-19 期间,优质 CMH 医疗服务的决定因素包括资源和能力、服务提供者之间的联系、定制化的医疗服务选择、获取服务的便利性以及人与人之间的联系。最后,我们注意到,在整个医疗保健行业中,权力动态将边缘化群体过度排斥在主流医疗保健系统和服务之外。我们的研究结果表明,虽然社区医疗中心在大流行病中的作用是显而易见的,但其有效性则取决于各个服务提供者为满足需求和服务使用者的需要而做出的努力。要想在未来的大灾难中重新发挥其作用,就需要各方共同努力,使社区医疗卫生系统成为各国灾难心理健康应对措施的重要组成部分,并投资于高质量的医疗服务,尤其是针对边缘化群体的医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信