Comparison of the effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine versus ketamine on postoperative analgesia in fracture femur patients operated under subarachnoid block – A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial

Rana Ather, S. Nikhar, Akhay Kumar Kar, P. Durga, Pindi Laxmi Prasanna
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine versus ketamine on postoperative analgesia in fracture femur patients operated under subarachnoid block – A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial","authors":"Rana Ather, S. Nikhar, Akhay Kumar Kar, P. Durga, Pindi Laxmi Prasanna","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_67_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Intravenous sedation during spinal anesthesia has the advantages of increased duration of spinal anesthesia and better postoperative pain control. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of intravenous bolus and infusion of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine given intraoperative on the postoperative analgesia in fracture femur patients operated under subarachnoid block.\n \n \n \n In this prospective randomized double-blind controlled study, 75 patients aged 18–65 years posted for elective surgery were selected and randomly divided into three groups to receive ketamine (group K), dexmedetomidine (group D), and saline (control group C). Postoperative pain was evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS). The duration of analgesia and the amount of analgesic consumption were also recorded. Student’s t-test and Chi-square test were used to compare the two groups, and one-way ANOVA with posthoc analysis was performed for comparison of the three groups.\n \n \n \n Patients in the ketamine group had better postoperative analgesia as assessed by decreased pain (on the NRS scale) and decreased need for postoperative rescue analgesics (P < 0.001). The duration of sensory block and motor block was prolonged in group K as compared to the other two groups (P < 0.001).\n \n \n \n Intraoperative use of intravenous ketamine was superior to dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia in fracture femur patients operated under subarachnoid block.\n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"6 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_67_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravenous sedation during spinal anesthesia has the advantages of increased duration of spinal anesthesia and better postoperative pain control. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of intravenous bolus and infusion of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine given intraoperative on the postoperative analgesia in fracture femur patients operated under subarachnoid block. In this prospective randomized double-blind controlled study, 75 patients aged 18–65 years posted for elective surgery were selected and randomly divided into three groups to receive ketamine (group K), dexmedetomidine (group D), and saline (control group C). Postoperative pain was evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS). The duration of analgesia and the amount of analgesic consumption were also recorded. Student’s t-test and Chi-square test were used to compare the two groups, and one-way ANOVA with posthoc analysis was performed for comparison of the three groups. Patients in the ketamine group had better postoperative analgesia as assessed by decreased pain (on the NRS scale) and decreased need for postoperative rescue analgesics (P < 0.001). The duration of sensory block and motor block was prolonged in group K as compared to the other two groups (P < 0.001). Intraoperative use of intravenous ketamine was superior to dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia in fracture femur patients operated under subarachnoid block.
股骨骨折患者蛛网膜下腔阻滞术中右美托咪定与氯胺酮对术后镇痛效果的比较--前瞻性随机双盲对照试验
脊髓麻醉期间静脉镇静具有延长脊髓麻醉时间和更好地控制术后疼痛的优点。本研究旨在比较在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下手术的股骨骨折患者术中静脉注射右美托咪定和氯胺酮对术后镇痛的影响。 在这项前瞻性随机双盲对照研究中,75 名年龄在 18-65 岁之间的择期手术患者被随机分为三组,分别接受氯胺酮(K 组)、右美托咪定(D 组)和生理盐水(对照组 C)治疗。术后疼痛采用数字评分量表(NRS)进行评估。此外,还记录了镇痛持续时间和镇痛剂用量。两组之间的比较采用学生 t 检验和卡方检验,三组之间的比较采用单因素方差分析和事后分析。 氯胺酮组患者的术后镇痛效果更佳,疼痛减轻(NRS评分),术后镇痛抢救药物需求减少(P < 0.001)。与其他两组相比,K 组的感觉阻滞和运动阻滞持续时间更长(P < 0.001)。 对于在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下手术的股骨骨折患者,术中静脉注射氯胺酮的术后镇痛效果优于右美托咪定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信