Harnessing Artificial Intelligence’s Potential in Rural Education Research: An Application of ChatGPT-4

{"title":"Harnessing Artificial Intelligence’s Potential in Rural Education Research: An Application of ChatGPT-4","authors":"","doi":"10.57125/fed.2024.06.25.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study delved into the capabilities of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance rural education research. Specifically, it sought to operationalise the research agenda outlined by the National Rural Education Association of the United States of America and involve scholar-practitioners in conducting research that could influence policy and practice in rural education. The study explored the opportunities of AI applications, specifically the ChatGPT-4, in generating initial study ideas for the Policy and Funding support theme within the National Rural Education Association Research Agenda – 2022-2027. The focus was on meeting the needs of racially and linguistically diverse students in rural educational settings. The ChatGPT-4 successfully generated five relevant research problems/study topics, nine research questions, and identified three possible theoretical frameworks. Four limitations were identified: (1) inaccuracy of the leading scholars, (2) the lack of contextual understanding, (3) the lack of domain expertise, and (4) a potential over-reliance on automated assistance. The results of this study highlighted the potential of ChatGPT-4 as an effective tool for researchers in the early stages of their projects. It was found that the ChatGPT-4 efficiently provided relevant research topics, questions, and theoretical frameworks. As such, it may provide several advantages in the initial research process including accuracy in generating research problems, saving time, reducing cognitive workload, and enhancing idea generation. Since the tool expedited idea generation, it may free up researchers to concentrate on other aspects of research such as critical thinking and analysis. However, the limitations included inaccuracies in identifying leading scholars, the lack of contextual understanding, insufficient domain expertise, and the risk of excessive dependence on automation. This suggests that caution should be used when utilising AI to support research as human expertise in content, context, and methodology is vital for conducting thorough research.","PeriodicalId":427861,"journal":{"name":"Futurity Education","volume":"11 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futurity Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57125/fed.2024.06.25.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory study delved into the capabilities of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance rural education research. Specifically, it sought to operationalise the research agenda outlined by the National Rural Education Association of the United States of America and involve scholar-practitioners in conducting research that could influence policy and practice in rural education. The study explored the opportunities of AI applications, specifically the ChatGPT-4, in generating initial study ideas for the Policy and Funding support theme within the National Rural Education Association Research Agenda – 2022-2027. The focus was on meeting the needs of racially and linguistically diverse students in rural educational settings. The ChatGPT-4 successfully generated five relevant research problems/study topics, nine research questions, and identified three possible theoretical frameworks. Four limitations were identified: (1) inaccuracy of the leading scholars, (2) the lack of contextual understanding, (3) the lack of domain expertise, and (4) a potential over-reliance on automated assistance. The results of this study highlighted the potential of ChatGPT-4 as an effective tool for researchers in the early stages of their projects. It was found that the ChatGPT-4 efficiently provided relevant research topics, questions, and theoretical frameworks. As such, it may provide several advantages in the initial research process including accuracy in generating research problems, saving time, reducing cognitive workload, and enhancing idea generation. Since the tool expedited idea generation, it may free up researchers to concentrate on other aspects of research such as critical thinking and analysis. However, the limitations included inaccuracies in identifying leading scholars, the lack of contextual understanding, insufficient domain expertise, and the risk of excessive dependence on automation. This suggests that caution should be used when utilising AI to support research as human expertise in content, context, and methodology is vital for conducting thorough research.
发挥人工智能在农村教育研究中的潜力:ChatGPT-4 的应用
这项探索性研究深入探讨了人工智能(AI)在加强农村教育研究方面的能力。具体而言,它试图将美利坚合众国全国农村教育协会概述的研究议程付诸实施,并让学者-实践者参与开展可影响农村教育政策和实践的研究。这项研究探索了人工智能应用(特别是 ChatGPT-4)的机会,为《2022-2027 年全国农村教育协会研究议程》中的政策和资金支持主题提出了初步研究想法。重点是满足农村教育环境中种族和语言多样化学生的需求。ChatGPT-4 成功地提出了五个相关的研究问题/研究课题、九个研究问题,并确定了三个可能的理论框架。确定了四个局限性:(1) 主要学者的不准确性,(2) 缺乏对背景的理解,(3) 缺乏领域专业知识,以及 (4) 可能过度依赖自动辅助。本研究的结果凸显了 ChatGPT-4 作为研究人员项目早期阶段有效工具的潜力。研究发现,ChatGPT-4 有效地提供了相关的研究课题、问题和理论框架。因此,它可以在初期研究过程中提供多种优势,包括生成研究问题的准确性、节省时间、减少认知工作量以及提高想法的生成。由于该工具加快了想法的产生,它可以让研究人员腾出时间专注于研究的其他方面,如批判性思维和分析。不过,该工具也存在一些局限性,包括在识别顶尖学者方面的不准确性、缺乏对背景的了解、领域专业知识不足以及过度依赖自动化的风险。这表明,在利用人工智能支持研究时应谨慎行事,因为人类在内容、背景和方法论方面的专业知识对于开展全面研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信