A. Ruiz-Redondo, Marc VANDER LINDEN, S. Radović, undefined Ivor KARAVANIĆ, Nikola Vukosavljević
{"title":"A cautionary tale from the Adriatic Palaeolithic: reassessing the stratigraphic reliability of Šandalja II cave (Istria, Croatia)","authors":"A. Ruiz-Redondo, Marc VANDER LINDEN, S. Radović, undefined Ivor KARAVANIĆ, Nikola Vukosavljević","doi":"10.5852/cr-palevol2024v23a15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Šandalja II has been a reference site for numerous decades for the definition and study of the Eastern Adriatic Upper Palaeolithic and corresponding techno-complexes. This is due both to its extensive material record, and the purported presence of some otherwise elusive techno-complexes in the area, such as the Aurignacian and the Early Epigravettian. In this paper, we present two new series of C14-AMS dates (from layers H, E, C/d and A/d) to assess the validity of its archaeological sequence, together with previously obtained radiocarbon dates, both AMS and conventional. The results show, unambiguously, the lack of reliability of the stratigraphy defined for the site during the excavation. A simple chronometric deconstruction reveals, at the very least, that the assemblages from Šandalja II can no longer be considered and used as an example of the diachronic evolution within the Aurignacian and Epigravettian of the Eastern Adriatic, thus calling for a further re-evaluation of features defined for the Adriatic Upper Palaeolithic on the basis on the assemblages from Šandalja II. Hence Šandalja II joins an increasing list of so-called reference sites which must not be considered as “referential” anymore.","PeriodicalId":506466,"journal":{"name":"Comptes Rendus Palevol","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes Rendus Palevol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5852/cr-palevol2024v23a15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Šandalja II has been a reference site for numerous decades for the definition and study of the Eastern Adriatic Upper Palaeolithic and corresponding techno-complexes. This is due both to its extensive material record, and the purported presence of some otherwise elusive techno-complexes in the area, such as the Aurignacian and the Early Epigravettian. In this paper, we present two new series of C14-AMS dates (from layers H, E, C/d and A/d) to assess the validity of its archaeological sequence, together with previously obtained radiocarbon dates, both AMS and conventional. The results show, unambiguously, the lack of reliability of the stratigraphy defined for the site during the excavation. A simple chronometric deconstruction reveals, at the very least, that the assemblages from Šandalja II can no longer be considered and used as an example of the diachronic evolution within the Aurignacian and Epigravettian of the Eastern Adriatic, thus calling for a further re-evaluation of features defined for the Adriatic Upper Palaeolithic on the basis on the assemblages from Šandalja II. Hence Šandalja II joins an increasing list of so-called reference sites which must not be considered as “referential” anymore.
亚得里亚海旧石器时代的警世故事:重新评估 Šandalja II 洞穴(克罗地亚伊斯特拉)地层的可靠性
数十年来,Šandalja II 一直是界定和研究东亚得里亚海上旧石器时代及相应技术综合体的参考遗址。这既是由于其大量的物质记录,也是由于该地区据称存在一些难以捉摸的技术复合体,如奥里格纳克和早期埃皮格拉维特。在本文中,我们提出了两个新的 C14-AMS 日期系列(来自 H、E、C/d 和 A/d 层),以评估其考古序列的有效性,以及之前获得的放射性碳日期,包括 AMS 和常规日期。结果明确显示,发掘期间为该遗址确定的地层缺乏可靠性。一个简单的年代解构至少表明,不能再将Šandalja II 遗址的出土文物视为东亚得里亚海奥里尼亚克和埃皮格拉维蒂时代的异时空演变的范例,因此需要根据Šandalja II 遗址的出土文物对亚得里亚海上古石器时代的特征进行进一步的重新评估。因此,在越来越多的所谓参考遗址中,Šandalja II 已不再被视为 "参考 "遗址。