Artificial intelligence to detect noise events in remote monitoring data

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nobuhiro Nishii MD, PhD, Kensuke Baba PhD, Ken'ichi Morooka PhD, Haruto Shirae, Tomofumi Mizuno MD, Takuro Masuda MD, Akira Ueoka MD, PhD, Saori Asada MD, PhD, Masakazu Miyamoto MD, Kentaro Ejiri MD, PhD, Satoshi Kawada MD, PhD, Koji Nakagawa MD, PhD, Kazufumi Nakamura MD, PhD, Hiroshi Morita MD, PhD, Shinsuke Yuasa MD, PhD
{"title":"Artificial intelligence to detect noise events in remote monitoring data","authors":"Nobuhiro Nishii MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kensuke Baba PhD,&nbsp;Ken'ichi Morooka PhD,&nbsp;Haruto Shirae,&nbsp;Tomofumi Mizuno MD,&nbsp;Takuro Masuda MD,&nbsp;Akira Ueoka MD, PhD,&nbsp;Saori Asada MD, PhD,&nbsp;Masakazu Miyamoto MD,&nbsp;Kentaro Ejiri MD, PhD,&nbsp;Satoshi Kawada MD, PhD,&nbsp;Koji Nakagawa MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kazufumi Nakamura MD, PhD,&nbsp;Hiroshi Morita MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shinsuke Yuasa MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) can detect various events early. However, the diagnostic ability of CIEDs has not been sufficient, especially for lead failure. The first notification of lead failure was almost noise events, which were detected as arrhythmia by the CIED. A human must analyze the intracardiac electrogram to accurately detect lead failure. However, the number of arrhythmic events is too large for human analysis. Artificial intelligence (AI) seems to be helpful in the early and accurate detection of lead failure before human analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To test whether a neural network can be trained to precisely identify noise events in the intracardiac electrogram of RM data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed 21 918 RM data consisting of 12 925 and 1884 Medtronic and Boston Scientific data, respectively. Among these, 153 and 52 Medtronic and Boston Scientific data, respectively, were diagnosed as noise events by human analysis. In Medtronic, 306 events, including 153 noise events and randomly selected 153 out of 12 692 nonnoise events, were analyzed in a five-fold cross-validation with a convolutional neural network. The Boston Scientific data were analyzed similarly.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The precision rate, recall rate, F1 score, accuracy rate, and the area under the curve were 85.8 ± 4.0%, 91.6 ± 6.7%, 88.4 ± 2.0%, 88.0 ± 2.0%, and 0.958 ± 0.021 in Medtronic and 88.4 ± 12.8%, 81.0 ± 9.3%, 84.1 ± 8.3%, 84.2 ± 8.3% and 0.928 ± 0.041 in Boston Scientific. Five-fold cross-validation with a weighted loss function could increase the recall rate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>AI can accurately detect noise events. AI analysis may be helpful for detecting lead failure events early and accurately.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"40 3","pages":"560-577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.13037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) can detect various events early. However, the diagnostic ability of CIEDs has not been sufficient, especially for lead failure. The first notification of lead failure was almost noise events, which were detected as arrhythmia by the CIED. A human must analyze the intracardiac electrogram to accurately detect lead failure. However, the number of arrhythmic events is too large for human analysis. Artificial intelligence (AI) seems to be helpful in the early and accurate detection of lead failure before human analysis.

Objective

To test whether a neural network can be trained to precisely identify noise events in the intracardiac electrogram of RM data.

Methods

We analyzed 21 918 RM data consisting of 12 925 and 1884 Medtronic and Boston Scientific data, respectively. Among these, 153 and 52 Medtronic and Boston Scientific data, respectively, were diagnosed as noise events by human analysis. In Medtronic, 306 events, including 153 noise events and randomly selected 153 out of 12 692 nonnoise events, were analyzed in a five-fold cross-validation with a convolutional neural network. The Boston Scientific data were analyzed similarly.

Results

The precision rate, recall rate, F1 score, accuracy rate, and the area under the curve were 85.8 ± 4.0%, 91.6 ± 6.7%, 88.4 ± 2.0%, 88.0 ± 2.0%, and 0.958 ± 0.021 in Medtronic and 88.4 ± 12.8%, 81.0 ± 9.3%, 84.1 ± 8.3%, 84.2 ± 8.3% and 0.928 ± 0.041 in Boston Scientific. Five-fold cross-validation with a weighted loss function could increase the recall rate.

Conclusions

AI can accurately detect noise events. AI analysis may be helpful for detecting lead failure events early and accurately.

Abstract Image

人工智能检测远程监控数据中的噪声事件
心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的远程监控(RM)可以及早发现各种事件。然而,CIED 的诊断能力还不够,尤其是对导联线故障的诊断能力。导联故障的首次通知几乎都是噪音事件,这些事件被 CIED 检测为心律失常。人类必须分析心内电图才能准确检测出导联失效。然而,心律失常事件的数量太大,人类无法进行分析。我们分析了 21 918 个 RM 数据,其中美敦力和波士顿科学的数据分别为 12 925 个和 1884 个。我们分析了 21 918 个 RM 数据,包括 12 925 个美敦力数据和 1884 个波士顿科学数据,其中美敦力数据和波士顿科学数据分别有 153 个和 52 个被人工分析诊断为噪声事件。在美敦力公司的数据中,有 306 个事件(包括 153 个噪声事件和从 12 692 个非噪声事件中随机抽取的 153 个事件)通过卷积神经网络进行了五倍交叉验证分析。美敦力的精确率、召回率、F1 分数、准确率和曲线下面积分别为 85.8 ± 4.0%、91.6 ± 6.7%、88.4 ± 2.0%、88.0 ± 2.0% 和 0.958 ± 0.021;波士顿科学的精确率、召回率、F1 分数、准确率和曲线下面积分别为 88.4 ± 12.8%、81.0 ± 9.3%、84.1 ± 8.3%、84.2 ± 8.3% 和 0.928 ± 0.041。使用加权损失函数进行五倍交叉验证可提高召回率。人工智能分析可能有助于早期准确检测出导联故障事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信