Primárias abertas e simultâneas na América Latina. Uma proposta preliminar para um estudo comparativo

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Daniel Buquet, Ariadna Gallo
{"title":"Primárias abertas e simultâneas na América Latina. Uma proposta preliminar para um estudo comparativo","authors":"Daniel Buquet, Ariadna Gallo","doi":"10.7440/colombiaint118.2024.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective/context: This article presents a comparative analysis of the system of simultaneous and open presidential primaries (PAS, for its acronym in Spanish) in Latin American countries that have adopted legislation on the subject. In what appears to be a growing trend, nine countries—with differences among them—have established a PAS regime regulated by the electoral body and with public financing. Methodology: First, a description is presented to characterize and classify different PAS systems, considering their main normative differences. Then, hypotheses about their possible effects are proposed based on the literature on presidential primaries and electoral systems. Finally, taking into account the results of the primaries carried out and the subsequent presidential elections, an attempt is made to show to what extent the PAS system encourages citizen participation and competition for nomination, whether it favors or harms the parties that carry them out, and its capacity to stabilize the party system. Conclusions: Factors that stimulate participation, such as compulsory voting and simultaneity with other elections, and encourage competition, such as open presidential ticket, are identified. No institutional factors are found to directly benefit or harm the groups that decide the candidacy in a primary, although conflicting primaries seem to affect them. The ability of the PAS system to stabilize party systems seems to depend on its interaction with other institutional and political factors. Originality: This is the first work that ventures into a comparative analysis of the PAS system with regional coverage.","PeriodicalId":35154,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Internacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint118.2024.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective/context: This article presents a comparative analysis of the system of simultaneous and open presidential primaries (PAS, for its acronym in Spanish) in Latin American countries that have adopted legislation on the subject. In what appears to be a growing trend, nine countries—with differences among them—have established a PAS regime regulated by the electoral body and with public financing. Methodology: First, a description is presented to characterize and classify different PAS systems, considering their main normative differences. Then, hypotheses about their possible effects are proposed based on the literature on presidential primaries and electoral systems. Finally, taking into account the results of the primaries carried out and the subsequent presidential elections, an attempt is made to show to what extent the PAS system encourages citizen participation and competition for nomination, whether it favors or harms the parties that carry them out, and its capacity to stabilize the party system. Conclusions: Factors that stimulate participation, such as compulsory voting and simultaneity with other elections, and encourage competition, such as open presidential ticket, are identified. No institutional factors are found to directly benefit or harm the groups that decide the candidacy in a primary, although conflicting primaries seem to affect them. The ability of the PAS system to stabilize party systems seems to depend on its interaction with other institutional and political factors. Originality: This is the first work that ventures into a comparative analysis of the PAS system with regional coverage.
拉丁美洲的公开初选和同步初选。比较研究的初步建议
目的/背景:本文对已通过相关立法的拉丁美洲国家的同步公开总统初选制度(PAS,西班牙语缩写)进行了比较分析。九个国家建立了由选举机构监管并由公共财政资助的总统选举制度,这似乎是一种日益增长的趋势,但各国之间存在差异。方法:首先,考虑到不同政治辅助制度在规范方面的主要差异,对其特点和分类进行描述。然后,根据有关总统初选和选举制度的文献,对其可能产生的影响提出假设。最后,考虑到初选的结果和随后的总统选举,试图说明总统辅助选举制度在多大程度上鼓励了公民参与和提名竞争,对实施初选的政党是有利还是有害,以及其稳定政党制度的能力。结论:确定了激励参与的因素,如强制投票和与其他选举同时进行,以及鼓励竞争的因素,如开放式总统候选人资格。尽管相互冲突的初选似乎会对决定初选候选资格的团体产生影响,但没有发现任何制度因素会直接对这些团体有利或不利。初选制度稳定政党制度的能力似乎取决于它与其他制度和政治因素的相互作用。独创性:这是第一部在地区范围内对政治委任制度进行比较分析的著作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Colombia Internacional
Colombia Internacional Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信