Human Leucocyte Antigen Genetics in Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury with Evidence Based on the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method.

Rolf Teschke, Gaby Danan
{"title":"Human Leucocyte Antigen Genetics in Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury with Evidence Based on the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method.","authors":"Rolf Teschke, Gaby Danan","doi":"10.3390/medicines11040009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The human leucocyte antigen (HLA) allele variability was studied in cohorts of patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). Some reports showed an association between HLA genetics and iDILI, proposing HLA alleles as a potential risk factor for the liver injury. However, the strength of such assumptions heavily depends on the quality of the iDILI diagnosis, calling for a thorough analysis. Using the PubMed database and Google Science, a total of 25 reports of case series or single cases were retrieved using the terms HLA genes and iDILI. It turned out that in 10/25 reports (40%), HLA genetics were determined in iDILI cases, for which no causality assessment method (CAM) was used or a non-validated tool was applied, meaning the findings were based on subjective opinion, providing disputable results and hence not scoring individual key elements. By contrast, in most iDILI reports (60%), the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) was applied, which is the diagnostic algorithm preferred worldwide to assess causality in iDILI cases and represents a quantitative, objective tool that has been well validated by both internal and external DILI experts. The RUCAM provided evidence-based results concerning liver injury by 1 drug class (antituberculotics + antiretrovirals) and 19 different drugs, comprising 900 iDILI cases. Among the top-ranking drugs were amoxicillin-clavulanate (290 cases, HLA A*02:01 or HLA A*30:02), followed by flucloxacillin (255 cases, HLA B*57:01), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (86 cases, HLA B*14:01 or HLA B*14:02), methimazole (40 cases, HLA C*03:02), carbamazepine (29 cases, HLA A*31:01), and nitrofurantoin (26 cases, HLA A*33:01). In conclusion, the HLA genetics in 900 idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury cases with evidence based on the RUCAM are available for studying the mechanistic steps leading to the injury, including metabolic factors through cytochrome P450 isoforms and processes that activate the innate immune system to the adaptive immune system.","PeriodicalId":18644,"journal":{"name":"Medicines","volume":"79 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines11040009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The human leucocyte antigen (HLA) allele variability was studied in cohorts of patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). Some reports showed an association between HLA genetics and iDILI, proposing HLA alleles as a potential risk factor for the liver injury. However, the strength of such assumptions heavily depends on the quality of the iDILI diagnosis, calling for a thorough analysis. Using the PubMed database and Google Science, a total of 25 reports of case series or single cases were retrieved using the terms HLA genes and iDILI. It turned out that in 10/25 reports (40%), HLA genetics were determined in iDILI cases, for which no causality assessment method (CAM) was used or a non-validated tool was applied, meaning the findings were based on subjective opinion, providing disputable results and hence not scoring individual key elements. By contrast, in most iDILI reports (60%), the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) was applied, which is the diagnostic algorithm preferred worldwide to assess causality in iDILI cases and represents a quantitative, objective tool that has been well validated by both internal and external DILI experts. The RUCAM provided evidence-based results concerning liver injury by 1 drug class (antituberculotics + antiretrovirals) and 19 different drugs, comprising 900 iDILI cases. Among the top-ranking drugs were amoxicillin-clavulanate (290 cases, HLA A*02:01 or HLA A*30:02), followed by flucloxacillin (255 cases, HLA B*57:01), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (86 cases, HLA B*14:01 or HLA B*14:02), methimazole (40 cases, HLA C*03:02), carbamazepine (29 cases, HLA A*31:01), and nitrofurantoin (26 cases, HLA A*33:01). In conclusion, the HLA genetics in 900 idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury cases with evidence based on the RUCAM are available for studying the mechanistic steps leading to the injury, including metabolic factors through cytochrome P450 isoforms and processes that activate the innate immune system to the adaptive immune system.
基于 Roussel Uclaf 因果关系评估方法的证据:人类白细胞抗原遗传学在非同源性药物性肝损伤中的应用。
在特发性药物性肝损伤(iDILI)患者群体中研究了人类白细胞抗原(HLA)等位基因的变异性。一些报告显示 HLA 遗传学与 iDILI 之间存在关联,认为 HLA 等位基因是肝损伤的潜在风险因素。然而,这种假设的强度在很大程度上取决于 iDILI 诊断的质量,因此需要进行全面的分析。利用PubMed数据库和Google Science,以HLA基因和iDILI为关键词,共检索到25篇系列病例或单个病例报告。结果发现,在10/25篇报告(40%)中,iDILI病例中的HLA基因被确定,但没有使用因果关系评估方法(CAM)或使用了未经验证的工具,这意味着研究结果是基于主观意见,提供了有争议的结果,因此无法对单个关键要素进行评分。相比之下,大多数 iDILI 报告(60%)都采用了鲁塞尔-乌克拉夫因果关系评估法(RUCAM),这是全球首选的评估 iDILI 病例因果关系的诊断算法,也是一种量化的客观工具,已得到内部和外部 DILI 专家的充分验证。RUCAM 提供了以证据为基础的结果,涉及 1 类药物(抗结核药物 + 抗逆转录病毒药物)和 19 种不同药物造成的肝损伤,包括 900 个 iDILI 病例。排名第一的药物是阿莫西林-克拉维酸(290 例,HLA A*02:01 或 HLA A*30:02),其次是氟氯西林(255 例,HLA B*57:01)、三甲双氨-磺胺甲噁唑(86 例,HLA B*14:01 或 HLA B*14:02)、甲巯咪唑(40 例,HLA C*03:02)、卡马西平(29 例,HLA A*31:01)和硝基呋喃妥因(26 例,HLA A*33:01)。总之,900 例特异性药物性肝损伤病例的 HLA 遗传学证据基于 RUCAM,可用于研究导致损伤的机理步骤,包括通过细胞色素 P450 同工酶的代谢因素和激活先天性免疫系统到适应性免疫系统的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信