Xia Zhou, Zhihao An, Ziheng Liu, Hongjie Ha, Yixuan Li, Renming Pan
{"title":"The Influence of the Heat Transfer Mode on the Stability of Foam Extinguishing Agents","authors":"Xia Zhou, Zhihao An, Ziheng Liu, Hongjie Ha, Yixuan Li, Renming Pan","doi":"10.3390/fire7040137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mass loss mechanisms of an aqueous film-forming foam (AF foam), an AR/AFFF water-soluble film-forming foam extinguishing agent (AR foam), and a Class A foam extinguishing agent (A foam) at different levels of thermal radiation, thermal convection, and heat conduction intensity were studied. At a relatively low thermal radiation intensity, the liquid separation rate of the AF, AR, and A foams is related to the properties of the foam itself, such as viscosity and surface/interface tension, which are relatively independent of the external radiation heat flux of the foam. At low radiation intensity (15 kW/m2 and 25 kW/m2), the liquid separation rate of the AF and A foams is relatively stable. When the heat flux intensity is 35 kW/m2, the liquid separation rate of the AF and A foams increases notably, which may be mainly due to the rapid decrease in foam viscosity. And the mass loss behavior is dominated by liquid separation in the AF, AR, and A foams under the influence of thermal radiation and thermal convection. Under the same experimental conditions, the liquid separation rate of AF is the fastest. There is no significant difference in the evaporation rates of the three kinds of foam in the same heat conduction condition. In addition, the AR and A foams usually have a 25% longer liquid separation time (t) under thermal radiation and thermal convection, and the thermal stability is better than AF foam. The temperature reached by the AF foam layer under thermal convection was lower than that of the AR and A foams, and the time for the foam layer to reach the highest temperature under heat conduction was longer than that of the AR and A foams.","PeriodicalId":508952,"journal":{"name":"Fire","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7040137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mass loss mechanisms of an aqueous film-forming foam (AF foam), an AR/AFFF water-soluble film-forming foam extinguishing agent (AR foam), and a Class A foam extinguishing agent (A foam) at different levels of thermal radiation, thermal convection, and heat conduction intensity were studied. At a relatively low thermal radiation intensity, the liquid separation rate of the AF, AR, and A foams is related to the properties of the foam itself, such as viscosity and surface/interface tension, which are relatively independent of the external radiation heat flux of the foam. At low radiation intensity (15 kW/m2 and 25 kW/m2), the liquid separation rate of the AF and A foams is relatively stable. When the heat flux intensity is 35 kW/m2, the liquid separation rate of the AF and A foams increases notably, which may be mainly due to the rapid decrease in foam viscosity. And the mass loss behavior is dominated by liquid separation in the AF, AR, and A foams under the influence of thermal radiation and thermal convection. Under the same experimental conditions, the liquid separation rate of AF is the fastest. There is no significant difference in the evaporation rates of the three kinds of foam in the same heat conduction condition. In addition, the AR and A foams usually have a 25% longer liquid separation time (t) under thermal radiation and thermal convection, and the thermal stability is better than AF foam. The temperature reached by the AF foam layer under thermal convection was lower than that of the AR and A foams, and the time for the foam layer to reach the highest temperature under heat conduction was longer than that of the AR and A foams.
研究了水成膜泡沫(AF 泡沫)、AR/AFFF 水溶性成膜泡沫灭火剂(AR 泡沫)和 A 级泡沫灭火剂(A 泡沫)在不同热辐射、热对流和热传导强度下的质量损失机理。在相对较低的热辐射强度下,AF、AR 和 A 泡沫的液体分离率与泡沫本身的特性有关,如粘度和表面/界面张力,而这些特性与泡沫的外部辐射热流量相对无关。在低辐射强度下(15 kW/m2 和 25 kW/m2),AF 和 A 泡沫的液体分离率相对稳定。当热流强度为 35 kW/m2 时,AF 和 A 泡沫的液体分离率显著增加,这可能主要是由于泡沫粘度的快速下降。在热辐射和热对流的影响下,AF、AR 和 A 泡沫的质量损失行为以液体分离为主。在相同的实验条件下,AF 的液体分离速度最快。在相同的热传导条件下,三种泡沫的蒸发率没有明显差异。此外,在热辐射和热对流条件下,AR 和 A 泡沫的液体分离时间(t)通常比 AF 泡沫长 25%,热稳定性也比 AF 泡沫好。在热对流条件下,AF 泡沫层达到的温度低于 AR 和 A 泡沫,在热传导条件下,泡沫层达到最高温度的时间也长于 AR 和 A 泡沫。