Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency on the suprascapular and axillary-circumflex nerve for shoulder pain: A randomised controlled trial

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
José Miguel Esparza Miñana, G. Mazzinari, José Emilio Llopis-Calatayud, Germán Cerdá-Olmedo
{"title":"Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency on the suprascapular and axillary-circumflex nerve for shoulder pain: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"José Miguel Esparza Miñana, G. Mazzinari, José Emilio Llopis-Calatayud, Germán Cerdá-Olmedo","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_1107_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Painful shoulder is one of the most frequent consultation causes. Multiple treatments have been described to relieve pain, restore range of motion and improve functionality.\n \n \n \n This randomised clinical trial was conducted in 60 patients. The treatment group received combined pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) on suprascapular nerve (SN) and axillary-circumflex nerve (ACN). The control group received PRF on SN only. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant–Murley range of motion scale and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale. The patients were monitored at the baseline visit and at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months. A mixed ordinal regression model was estimated to evaluate the association between the study group and pain measured with NRS.\n \n \n \n A global decrease in pain at the end of the study was noted. The global baseline NRS was 8.4, and the global final NRS at 9 months of follow-up was 6.2. Combined PRF on SN and ACN was not associated with lower NRS pain scores compared to single SN PRF [odds ratio (OR) =1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–1.20, P = 0.507]. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences: SPADI (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.92–1.18), Constant–Murley (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.90–1.14), DASH (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.92–1.17).\n \n \n \n Combined PRF applied to SN and ACN was not superior to PRF applied to SN alone.\n","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1107_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Painful shoulder is one of the most frequent consultation causes. Multiple treatments have been described to relieve pain, restore range of motion and improve functionality. This randomised clinical trial was conducted in 60 patients. The treatment group received combined pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) on suprascapular nerve (SN) and axillary-circumflex nerve (ACN). The control group received PRF on SN only. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant–Murley range of motion scale and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale. The patients were monitored at the baseline visit and at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months. A mixed ordinal regression model was estimated to evaluate the association between the study group and pain measured with NRS. A global decrease in pain at the end of the study was noted. The global baseline NRS was 8.4, and the global final NRS at 9 months of follow-up was 6.2. Combined PRF on SN and ACN was not associated with lower NRS pain scores compared to single SN PRF [odds ratio (OR) =1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–1.20, P = 0.507]. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences: SPADI (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.92–1.18), Constant–Murley (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.90–1.14), DASH (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.92–1.17). Combined PRF applied to SN and ACN was not superior to PRF applied to SN alone.
脉冲射频治疗肩胛上神经和腋窝环状神经疼痛的疗效:随机对照试验
肩部疼痛是最常见的会诊原因之一。有多种治疗方法可以缓解疼痛、恢复活动范围并改善功能。 这项随机临床试验在 60 名患者中进行。治疗组在肩胛上神经(SN)和腋环神经(ACN)上接受联合脉冲射频(PRF)治疗。对照组仅在SN上接受脉冲射频治疗。主要结果是用数字评分量表(NRS)测量疼痛强度。次要结果是肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)、恒定-默里运动范围量表和手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)量表。患者在基线访问、1、3、6 和 9 个月时接受监测。研究人员采用混合序数回归模型来评估研究组与用 NRS 测量的疼痛之间的关系。 在研究结束时,疼痛总体上有所减轻。总体基线 NRS 为 8.4,随访 9 个月时的总体最终 NRS 为 6.2。与单一 SN PRF 相比,SN 和 ACN 的联合 PRF 与较低的 NRS 疼痛评分无关[几率比 (OR) =1.04,95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.91-1.20,P = 0.507]。次要结果无明显差异:SPADI(OR = 1.04,95% CI 0.92-1.18)、Constant-Murley(OR = 1.01,95% CI 0.90-1.14)、DASH(OR = 1.04,95% CI 0.92-1.17)。 将 PRF 联合应用于 SN 和 ACN 不优于单独应用于 SN 的 PRF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信