ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FEATURE DESCRIPTORS ON THE AUTOMATIC CO-REGISTRATION OF OVERLAPPING IMAGES

O. Ajayi, I. J. Nwadialor
{"title":"ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FEATURE DESCRIPTORS ON THE AUTOMATIC CO-REGISTRATION OF OVERLAPPING IMAGES","authors":"O. Ajayi, I. J. Nwadialor","doi":"10.3846/gac.2024.18199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research seeks to assess the effect of different selected feature descriptors on the accuracy of an automatic image registration scheme. Three different feature descriptors were selected based on their peculiar characteristics, and implemented in the process of developing the image registration scheme. These feature descriptors (Modified Harris and Stephens corner detector (MHCD), the Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and the Speeded Up Robust Feature (SURF)) were used to automatically extract the conjugate points common to the overlapping image pairs used for the registration. Random Sampling Consensus (RANSAC) algorithm was used to exclude outliers and to fit the matched correspondences, Sum of Absolute Differences (SAD) which is a correlation-based feature matching metric was used for the feature match, while projective transformation function was used for the computation of the transformation matrix (T). The obtained overall result proved that the SURF algorithm outperforms the other two feature descriptors with an accuracy measure of -0.0009 pixels, while SIFT with a cumulative signed distance of 0.0328 pixels also proved to be more accurate than MHCD with a cumulative signed distance of 0.0457 pixels. The findings affirmed the importance of choosing the right feature descriptor in the overall accuracy of an automatic image registration scheme.","PeriodicalId":502308,"journal":{"name":"Geodesy and cartography","volume":"5 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodesy and cartography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2024.18199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research seeks to assess the effect of different selected feature descriptors on the accuracy of an automatic image registration scheme. Three different feature descriptors were selected based on their peculiar characteristics, and implemented in the process of developing the image registration scheme. These feature descriptors (Modified Harris and Stephens corner detector (MHCD), the Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and the Speeded Up Robust Feature (SURF)) were used to automatically extract the conjugate points common to the overlapping image pairs used for the registration. Random Sampling Consensus (RANSAC) algorithm was used to exclude outliers and to fit the matched correspondences, Sum of Absolute Differences (SAD) which is a correlation-based feature matching metric was used for the feature match, while projective transformation function was used for the computation of the transformation matrix (T). The obtained overall result proved that the SURF algorithm outperforms the other two feature descriptors with an accuracy measure of -0.0009 pixels, while SIFT with a cumulative signed distance of 0.0328 pixels also proved to be more accurate than MHCD with a cumulative signed distance of 0.0457 pixels. The findings affirmed the importance of choosing the right feature descriptor in the overall accuracy of an automatic image registration scheme.
不同特征描述符对重叠图像自动共存效果的精度评估
本研究旨在评估所选不同特征描述符对自动图像配准方案准确性的影响。研究人员根据三种不同的特征描述符的特点,选择了三种不同的特征描述符,并在开发图像配准方案的过程中加以应用。这些特征描述符(修正哈里斯和斯蒂芬斯拐角检测器(MHCD)、尺度不变特征变换(SIFT)和加速鲁棒特征(SURF))用于自动提取用于配准的重叠图像对的共轭点。随机抽样共识(RANSAC)算法用于排除异常值和拟合匹配的对应关系,绝对差值总和(SAD)是一种基于相关性的特征匹配度量,用于特征匹配,而投影变换函数用于计算变换矩阵(T)。总体结果证明,SURF 算法的准确度为-0.0009 像素,优于其他两种特征描述符,而累积符号距离为 0.0328 像素的 SIFT 算法的准确度也高于累积符号距离为 0.0457 像素的 MHCD 算法。研究结果肯定了选择正确的特征描述子对自动图像配准方案整体准确性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信