Anterior Cervical and Upper Thoracic Column Reconstruction Using an Expandable Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone Vertebral Body Replacement: A Retrospective Single Center Cohort Analysis

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY
Martin Štefanides, Katharina A. C. Oswald, Anaïs K. Luyet, Christoph E. Albers, L. Benneker, Moritz C. Deml
{"title":"Anterior Cervical and Upper Thoracic Column Reconstruction Using an Expandable Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone Vertebral Body Replacement: A Retrospective Single Center Cohort Analysis","authors":"Martin Štefanides, Katharina A. C. Oswald, Anaïs K. Luyet, Christoph E. Albers, L. Benneker, Moritz C. Deml","doi":"10.3390/std13020008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) expandable vertebral body replacement (VBR) for anterior cervico-thoracic vertebral column reconstruction in patients with metastatic, traumatic, or degenerative diseases. Radiographic and clinical outcomes, as well as complication rates, were analyzed in a retrospective analysis of 28 patients (61 ± 13 years; 64% female) who underwent an anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) with the Expandable Corpectomy Device (ECD) from DePuy/Synthes (2011–2020). Correction of the bisegmental kyphotic angle (BKA) was chosen as the primary outcome. Bony fusion, loss of device height, and implant subsidence were evaluated additionally. Clinical outcome was assessed using Odom’s criteria, the numerical pain rating scale (NRS), the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS). Our study found a significant improvement in the BKA (12.3° ± 9.6°; p = 0.0002) at the last follow-up with no statistically relevant loss of device height (p = 0.96) or implant subsidence (p = 0.99). Successful bony fusion was observed in all patients. The KPSS significantly improved in patients with a tumorous disease at the time of discharge (p = 0.0009), and the sensation of pain showed significant improvement at six months post-operatively and at the final follow-up (p = 0.004; p = 0.021). However, four patients needed further secondary posterior stabilization, and one ECD was explanted due to a severe surgical site infection after an accidental esophageal lesion. In conclusion, the ECD proofed the radiographic stability for the anterior column reconstruction of the cervico-thoracic spine with significantly improved clinical outcome.","PeriodicalId":40379,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Techniques Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Techniques Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/std13020008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) expandable vertebral body replacement (VBR) for anterior cervico-thoracic vertebral column reconstruction in patients with metastatic, traumatic, or degenerative diseases. Radiographic and clinical outcomes, as well as complication rates, were analyzed in a retrospective analysis of 28 patients (61 ± 13 years; 64% female) who underwent an anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) with the Expandable Corpectomy Device (ECD) from DePuy/Synthes (2011–2020). Correction of the bisegmental kyphotic angle (BKA) was chosen as the primary outcome. Bony fusion, loss of device height, and implant subsidence were evaluated additionally. Clinical outcome was assessed using Odom’s criteria, the numerical pain rating scale (NRS), the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS). Our study found a significant improvement in the BKA (12.3° ± 9.6°; p = 0.0002) at the last follow-up with no statistically relevant loss of device height (p = 0.96) or implant subsidence (p = 0.99). Successful bony fusion was observed in all patients. The KPSS significantly improved in patients with a tumorous disease at the time of discharge (p = 0.0009), and the sensation of pain showed significant improvement at six months post-operatively and at the final follow-up (p = 0.004; p = 0.021). However, four patients needed further secondary posterior stabilization, and one ECD was explanted due to a severe surgical site infection after an accidental esophageal lesion. In conclusion, the ECD proofed the radiographic stability for the anterior column reconstruction of the cervico-thoracic spine with significantly improved clinical outcome.
使用可膨胀聚醚醚酮椎体替代物的前路颈椎和上胸椎柱重建术:单中心队列回顾性分析
本研究旨在评估一种新型聚醚醚酮(PEEK)可膨胀椎体置换术(VBR)的安全性和有效性,该置换术适用于转移性、创伤性或退行性疾病患者的颈胸椎前路椎体重建。我们对使用 DePuy/Synthes 公司生产的可扩张椎间盘切除装置(ECD)进行颈椎前路切除和融合术(ACCF)的 28 位患者(61 ± 13 岁,64% 为女性)(2011-2020 年)进行了回顾性分析,对他们的放射学和临床疗效以及并发症发生率进行了分析。双节段畸形角(BKA)的矫正被选为主要结果。此外,还对骨融合、装置高度损失和植入物下沉进行了评估。临床结果采用奥多姆标准、数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)、美国脊柱损伤协会损伤量表(AIS)和卡诺夫斯基表现状态量表(KPSS)进行评估。我们的研究发现,在最后一次随访时,BKA 有了明显改善(12.3° ± 9.6°;p = 0.0002),而且在统计学上没有出现装置高度损失(p = 0.96)或植入物下沉(p = 0.99)。所有患者都成功实现了骨融合。肿瘤患者出院时的 KPSS 显著改善(p = 0.0009),术后 6 个月和最后随访时的疼痛感显著改善(p = 0.004;p = 0.021)。不过,有四名患者需要进一步进行二次后方稳定,有一名患者因食管意外病变导致手术部位严重感染,因而需要将 ECD 取出。总之,ECD 证明了颈胸椎前柱重建的放射学稳定性,并显著改善了临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信