Linking education and practice gaps for inclusive architecture in the AEC industry

Sandra Carrasco, Irene Perez Lopez
{"title":"Linking education and practice gaps for inclusive architecture in the AEC industry","authors":"Sandra Carrasco, Irene Perez Lopez","doi":"10.1108/arch-11-2023-0297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study explores the opportunities for a gender-inclusive architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, focussing on the gap between architectural education and practice. This study focusses on three research questions: (1) What factors influence women architects' career retention and advancement in the AEC industry? How can practice outcomes be linked with educational approaches for gender inclusion in the AEC industry? (3) What critical factors can enable structural changes in architecture education, including AEC-related subjects and practice/career pathways towards gender equity?Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on a systematic literature review (SLR). The established timeframe for selecting papers in this study considered the last 20 years, as various seminal studies in feminism and gender inclusion in architecture emerged in the early 2000s through the definition of keywords used in two prestigious databases. The academic articles selected were filtered through a process of inclusion and exclusion, following criteria for suitability and relevance using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) diagram.FindingsThis study revealed key trends in the literature review consistent with the research questions, including (1) the disproportionate struggles women face at individual, interpersonal and organisational levels and the gender-based bias from entry and progression in the AEC industry that also requires multi-level interventions; (2) traditional architecture education affects female students and educators who find networking, social capital and leadership opportunities to challenge gender-based stereotypes and promote workplace equity, and finally, (3) observe enablers for fostering equity in architecture and education, which should not be limited to policy-driven interventions but structural transformations through transparency, mentorship, leadership, awareness raising and empowerment of women and men, promoting inclusivity and gender equity in the AEC industry.Research limitations/implicationsThis study considers a global understanding of gender equity in the AEC industry, regional and country-specific analysis needs to be considered in future studies. The study's focus is on women’s inclusion, acknowledging the limitations of conventional binary gender concepts; future studies need to include the experiences of LGBTI + communities and other underrepresented groups. The literature review considers only academic articles; future research should also consider industry reports, government initiatives and organisational documents for a broader understanding of diversity efforts in business.Originality/valueThis paper observes the issues for gender-inclusive architecture within the context of a male-dominant AEC industry through linking architectural education and practice. Studies rarely focus on this link and address workplace issues. This study highlights this link and extends the discussion through the critical literature review, providing a new ground for geographic-specific or intersectional studies.","PeriodicalId":503590,"journal":{"name":"Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-11-2023-0297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study explores the opportunities for a gender-inclusive architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, focussing on the gap between architectural education and practice. This study focusses on three research questions: (1) What factors influence women architects' career retention and advancement in the AEC industry? How can practice outcomes be linked with educational approaches for gender inclusion in the AEC industry? (3) What critical factors can enable structural changes in architecture education, including AEC-related subjects and practice/career pathways towards gender equity?Design/methodology/approachThis paper is based on a systematic literature review (SLR). The established timeframe for selecting papers in this study considered the last 20 years, as various seminal studies in feminism and gender inclusion in architecture emerged in the early 2000s through the definition of keywords used in two prestigious databases. The academic articles selected were filtered through a process of inclusion and exclusion, following criteria for suitability and relevance using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) diagram.FindingsThis study revealed key trends in the literature review consistent with the research questions, including (1) the disproportionate struggles women face at individual, interpersonal and organisational levels and the gender-based bias from entry and progression in the AEC industry that also requires multi-level interventions; (2) traditional architecture education affects female students and educators who find networking, social capital and leadership opportunities to challenge gender-based stereotypes and promote workplace equity, and finally, (3) observe enablers for fostering equity in architecture and education, which should not be limited to policy-driven interventions but structural transformations through transparency, mentorship, leadership, awareness raising and empowerment of women and men, promoting inclusivity and gender equity in the AEC industry.Research limitations/implicationsThis study considers a global understanding of gender equity in the AEC industry, regional and country-specific analysis needs to be considered in future studies. The study's focus is on women’s inclusion, acknowledging the limitations of conventional binary gender concepts; future studies need to include the experiences of LGBTI + communities and other underrepresented groups. The literature review considers only academic articles; future research should also consider industry reports, government initiatives and organisational documents for a broader understanding of diversity efforts in business.Originality/valueThis paper observes the issues for gender-inclusive architecture within the context of a male-dominant AEC industry through linking architectural education and practice. Studies rarely focus on this link and address workplace issues. This study highlights this link and extends the discussion through the critical literature review, providing a new ground for geographic-specific or intersectional studies.
将教育与实践差距联系起来,促进 AEC 行业的包容性建筑设计
目的 本研究探讨了性别包容的建筑、工程和施工(AEC)行业的机遇,重点关注建筑教育与实践之间的差距。本研究侧重于三个研究问题:(1) 哪些因素会影响女建筑师在 AEC 行业的职业保留和晋升?(2) 如何将实践成果与教育方法联系起来,促进 AEC 行业的性别包容?(3) 哪些关键因素能够促成建筑教育的结构性变革,包括与 AEC 相关的科目以及实现性别平等的实践/职业途径?本研究选择论文的既定时间框架考虑了过去 20 年的情况,因为通过定义两个著名数据库中使用的关键词,在 2000 年代初就出现了关于建筑中的女权主义和性别包容的各种开创性研究。根据系统综述首选报告项目(PRISMA)图表的适用性和相关性标准,对所选学术文章进行了筛选。研究结果本研究揭示了文献综述中与研究问题相一致的主要趋势,包括:(1) 女性在个人、人际和组织层面面临着不成比例的斗争,在进入 AEC 行业和发展过程中存在基于性别的偏见,这也需要多层次的干预措施;(2) 传统建筑教育对女性学生和教育工作者的影响,她们需要找到网络、社会资本和领导力机会来挑战基于性别的陈规定型观念,促进工作场所的公平;最后,(3) 观察促进建筑和教育公平的推动因素,这些因素不应局限于政策驱动的干预措施,而应通过透明度、导师制、领导力、提高认识和增强女性和男性的能力来实现结构性转变,促进 AEC 行业的包容性和性别公平。研究局限性/启示 本研究从全球角度理解了亚洲及太平洋地区电子电气行业中的性别平等问题,在今后的研究中需要考虑针对地区和国家的分析。本研究的重点是妇女的包容性,承认传统二元性别概念的局限性;未来的研究需要包括 LGBTI + 社区和其他代表性不足群体的经验。文献综述只考虑了学术文章;未来的研究还应考虑行业报告、政府倡议和组织文件,以便更广泛地了解企业的多元化努力。 原创性/价值 本文通过将建筑教育与实践联系起来,观察了在男性主导的 AEC 行业背景下性别包容性建筑的问题。很少有研究关注这一联系并解决工作场所的问题。本研究强调了这一联系,并通过批判性文献回顾扩展了讨论,为特定地域或交叉研究提供了新的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信