Canadian social workers’ attitudes toward immigrants with different legal statuses in Canada

Rupaleem Bhuyan, Sandra Osazuwa, Catherine Schmidt, Inwook Kwon, Andrew Rundle, Yoosun Park
{"title":"Canadian social workers’ attitudes toward immigrants with different legal statuses in Canada","authors":"Rupaleem Bhuyan, Sandra Osazuwa, Catherine Schmidt, Inwook Kwon, Andrew Rundle, Yoosun Park","doi":"10.1177/14680173241240942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study contributes to the ongoing efforts to address systemic inequality within social work by examining Canadian social workers’ attitudes toward immigrants who are permanent residents (PR), refugees, temporary residents (TR), or undocumented immigrants. Using a cross-sectional design with a convenience sample (n = 653), we explore how social workers’ attitudes toward immigrants vary in relation to (a) respondents’ demographics, (b) contact with immigrants, (c) perceptions of equal opportunities among immigrants, (d) perceptions of deservingness for immigrants with different legal statuses, and (e) the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these attitudes. While Canadian social workers generally express positive attitudes toward immigrants, there is a slightly stronger endorsement for PR and refugees to access public services compared to nonstatus (NS) immigrants and TR. Social workers who identify as conservative or have limited contact with immigrants are more likely to perceive NS immigrants as potential criminal threats or burdens on the healthcare system. Significantly, a majority of respondents feel that their social work training inadequately prepares them to work effectively with immigrants. Canadian social workers advocate for principles of diversity, inclusion, and commitment to social justice. However, perceptions regarding which immigrants deserve access to social services vary based on legal status, suggesting a limitation in social workers’ professional mandate. The study discusses implications for social work education and training, emphasizing the need to address and unsettle systemic racism within the profession.","PeriodicalId":515680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work","volume":"46 196","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173241240942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study contributes to the ongoing efforts to address systemic inequality within social work by examining Canadian social workers’ attitudes toward immigrants who are permanent residents (PR), refugees, temporary residents (TR), or undocumented immigrants. Using a cross-sectional design with a convenience sample (n = 653), we explore how social workers’ attitudes toward immigrants vary in relation to (a) respondents’ demographics, (b) contact with immigrants, (c) perceptions of equal opportunities among immigrants, (d) perceptions of deservingness for immigrants with different legal statuses, and (e) the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these attitudes. While Canadian social workers generally express positive attitudes toward immigrants, there is a slightly stronger endorsement for PR and refugees to access public services compared to nonstatus (NS) immigrants and TR. Social workers who identify as conservative or have limited contact with immigrants are more likely to perceive NS immigrants as potential criminal threats or burdens on the healthcare system. Significantly, a majority of respondents feel that their social work training inadequately prepares them to work effectively with immigrants. Canadian social workers advocate for principles of diversity, inclusion, and commitment to social justice. However, perceptions regarding which immigrants deserve access to social services vary based on legal status, suggesting a limitation in social workers’ professional mandate. The study discusses implications for social work education and training, emphasizing the need to address and unsettle systemic racism within the profession.
加拿大社会工作者对加拿大不同合法身份移民的态度
本研究通过考察加拿大社会工作者对永久居民(PR)、难民、临时居民(TR)或无证移民的态度,为解决社会工作中的系统性不平等问题做出贡献。我们采用方便抽样的横断面设计(n = 653),探讨了社会工作者对移民的态度在以下方面的变化:(a)受访者的人口统计学特征;(b)与移民的接触;(c)对移民机会均等的看法;(d)对不同法律地位的移民应得性的看法;以及(e)COVID-19 大流行对这些态度的影响。虽然加拿大社会工作者普遍对移民持积极态度,但与无身份(NS)移民和TR相比,他们对PR和难民获得公共服务的认可度略高。认为自己是保守派或与移民接触不多的社会工作者,更有可能将新移民视为潜在的犯罪威胁或医疗系统的负担。值得注意的是,大多数受访者认为,他们所接受的社会工作培训没有为他们有效开展移民工作做好充分准备。加拿大社会工作者倡导多元化、包容和致力于社会正义的原则。然而,对于哪些移民应该获得社会服务的看法却因法律地位而异,这表明社会工作者的专业任务存在局限性。本研究讨论了对社会工作教育和培训的影响,强调有必要解决和消除行业内的系统性种族主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信