Build a Bridge

Arthur J. Stewart
{"title":"Build a Bridge","authors":"Arthur J. Stewart","doi":"10.1002/lob.10637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>“Sometimes organization/and computation become absurd” (Barks et al. <span>1995</span>).</p><p>How could Rumi, the great 13<sup>th</sup>-century Persian poet who lived in what is now Afghanistan or Tajikistan, discount so casually, in one line, the value of organization and computation? Organization and computation (which is a form of organization) are amazingly powerful tools for investigating the world. Without these tools, it would be nigh impossible to collect and compile meaningful data, evaluate the results of experiments, or communicate scientific results to others. The contents of our yellow Rite-in-the-Rain notebooks—or now, more likely, entries in our tablets and laptops, from probes and data loggers—would consist of a series of jumbled, useless words, numbers, and random sketches. Was Rumi wrong? Are conditions now that different than they were 800 years ago, such that organization and computation were less important then than they are now? For this Viewpoint, I suggest yes and no.</p><p>First, the no: Rumi was not right. Organization and computation are not absurd. We depend critically on organization and computation every day in science, and we will depend on them even more in the future. We use them to understand the physical world—and these two tools have served us well. Scientifically and technologically, we are light-years ahead of where we used to be. But Rumi was right, too. We are human, and with respect to the central core of being human, we thrive on curiosity, intuition, hope, and beauty. These needs can be overshadowed as we rumble about collecting and interpreting data using organization, computation, and new technological tools. Core human features have not changed much since Rumi's days. We breathe now, like we did then, and our blood moves through arteries and veins, just like it did then. We still feed on curiosity, intuition, hope, and beauty. But for these things, we do not depend on organization or computation. Rather, we need to tap a sense of elation about being in the world—about being a <i>part</i> of the world. It is just the “sometimes” word that Rumi used in the leading quote that makes all the difference between yes, and no.</p><p>Elation can be beaten down by frustration, and we frequently get double doses of frustration on a daily basis. Are you annoyed, because you have trouble properly ground-truthing your LiDAR data set? Frustrated, because your acoustic Doppler current profiler is giving you only wonky data? Depressed, because the National Science Foundation just turned down your latest proposal? Being able to get back to the basic core of being human can be no small task: it means setting aside problems, at least briefly, and being able to resonate with more fundamentally human aspects of yourself. Yes, it can be difficult, but you have a choice. You can stew in frustrations, or you can build and maintain a bridge between your organizational/computational side and your creative/intuitive side. It is important for life-balance reasons to be able to do the latter. But how?</p><p>Poetry is a bridge one can use for this purpose: it can allow you to connect your logical, rational mind to your emotional, intuitive mind. A one minute read of Mary Oliver's poem, “Why I Wake Early,” will show you the truth in this assertion (Oliver <span>2004</span>). This poem can be freely accessed online. Try it.</p>","PeriodicalId":40008,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin","volume":"33 2","pages":"80-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lob.10637","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lob.10637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Sometimes organization/and computation become absurd” (Barks et al. 1995).

How could Rumi, the great 13th-century Persian poet who lived in what is now Afghanistan or Tajikistan, discount so casually, in one line, the value of organization and computation? Organization and computation (which is a form of organization) are amazingly powerful tools for investigating the world. Without these tools, it would be nigh impossible to collect and compile meaningful data, evaluate the results of experiments, or communicate scientific results to others. The contents of our yellow Rite-in-the-Rain notebooks—or now, more likely, entries in our tablets and laptops, from probes and data loggers—would consist of a series of jumbled, useless words, numbers, and random sketches. Was Rumi wrong? Are conditions now that different than they were 800 years ago, such that organization and computation were less important then than they are now? For this Viewpoint, I suggest yes and no.

First, the no: Rumi was not right. Organization and computation are not absurd. We depend critically on organization and computation every day in science, and we will depend on them even more in the future. We use them to understand the physical world—and these two tools have served us well. Scientifically and technologically, we are light-years ahead of where we used to be. But Rumi was right, too. We are human, and with respect to the central core of being human, we thrive on curiosity, intuition, hope, and beauty. These needs can be overshadowed as we rumble about collecting and interpreting data using organization, computation, and new technological tools. Core human features have not changed much since Rumi's days. We breathe now, like we did then, and our blood moves through arteries and veins, just like it did then. We still feed on curiosity, intuition, hope, and beauty. But for these things, we do not depend on organization or computation. Rather, we need to tap a sense of elation about being in the world—about being a part of the world. It is just the “sometimes” word that Rumi used in the leading quote that makes all the difference between yes, and no.

Elation can be beaten down by frustration, and we frequently get double doses of frustration on a daily basis. Are you annoyed, because you have trouble properly ground-truthing your LiDAR data set? Frustrated, because your acoustic Doppler current profiler is giving you only wonky data? Depressed, because the National Science Foundation just turned down your latest proposal? Being able to get back to the basic core of being human can be no small task: it means setting aside problems, at least briefly, and being able to resonate with more fundamentally human aspects of yourself. Yes, it can be difficult, but you have a choice. You can stew in frustrations, or you can build and maintain a bridge between your organizational/computational side and your creative/intuitive side. It is important for life-balance reasons to be able to do the latter. But how?

Poetry is a bridge one can use for this purpose: it can allow you to connect your logical, rational mind to your emotional, intuitive mind. A one minute read of Mary Oliver's poem, “Why I Wake Early,” will show you the truth in this assertion (Oliver 2004). This poem can be freely accessed online. Try it.

Abstract Image

架设桥梁
“有时组织和计算变得荒谬”(Barks et al. 1995)。鲁米,这位13世纪伟大的波斯诗人,生活在今天的阿富汗或塔吉克斯坦,怎么能在一句话中如此随意地贬低组织和计算的价值呢?组织和计算(它是组织的一种形式)是研究世界的惊人的强大工具。没有这些工具,几乎不可能收集和汇编有意义的数据,评估实验结果,或与他人交流科学结果。我们黄色的“雨中仪式”笔记本上的内容——或者现在,更有可能是我们平板电脑和笔记本电脑上的记录,来自探测器和数据记录器——将由一系列杂乱的、无用的单词、数字和随机的草图组成。鲁米错了吗?现在的情况是否与800年前不同,以至于组织和计算不像现在那么重要?对于这个观点,我的建议是“是”和“不是”。首先,不:鲁米是不对的。组织和计算并不荒谬。在科学研究中,我们每天都非常依赖于组织和计算,在未来,我们将更加依赖它们。我们用它们来理解物理世界——这两个工具对我们很有帮助。在科学和技术上,我们比过去领先了好几光年。但鲁米也是对的。我们是人类,就人类的核心而言,我们在好奇心、直觉、希望和美身上茁壮成长。当我们喋喋不休地使用组织、计算和新技术工具收集和解释数据时,这些需求可能会被掩盖。自鲁米时代以来,人类的核心特征没有太大变化。我们现在呼吸,就像那时一样,我们的血液在动脉和静脉中流动,就像那时一样。我们仍然以好奇心、直觉、希望和美为食。但对于这些事情,我们不依赖于组织或计算。相反,我们需要挖掘一种存在于世界上的喜悦感——作为世界的一部分。正是鲁米在引言中使用的“有时”这个词决定了是与不是之间的区别。喜悦可以被挫折打败,我们经常在每天的基础上得到双倍剂量的挫折。你是否因为无法正确处理激光雷达数据集而烦恼?沮丧,因为你的声波多普勒电流分析器只能给你不稳定的数据?沮丧,因为国家科学基金会刚刚拒绝了你的最新提案?能够回到做人的基本核心不是一件容易的事:这意味着把问题放在一边,至少是暂时的,并且能够与你自己更基本的人性方面产生共鸣。是的,这很困难,但你可以选择。你可以忍受挫折,或者你可以在你的组织/计算方面和你的创造性/直觉方面之间建立和维护一座桥梁。出于生活平衡的原因,能够做到后者是很重要的。但如何?诗歌是一座桥梁,可以用来达到这个目的:它可以让你连接你的逻辑,理性的头脑和你的情感,直觉的头脑。读一分钟玛丽·奥利弗的诗“为什么我醒得很早”,你就会明白这个论断的道理(奥利弗2004)。这首诗可以在网上免费下载。试一试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin
Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: All past issues of the Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin are available online, including its predecessors Communications to Members and the ASLO Bulletin. Access to the current and previous volume is restricted to members and institutions with a subscription to the ASLO journals. All other issues are freely accessible without a subscription. As part of ASLO’s mission to disseminate and communicate knowledge in the aquatic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信